Ievvel. Pag. 193.* 1.1Eusebius saith, S. Iames Epistle vvas vvritten by some other, and not by S. Iames, VVe must vnderstand (saith Eusebius) that it is a bastard epistle.
A detection of sundrie foule errours, lies, sclaunders, corruptions, and other false dealinges, touching doctrine, and other matters vttered and practized by M.Iewel, in a booke lately by him set foorth entituled, a defence of the apologie. &c. By Thomas Harding doctor of diuinitie.
About this Item
- Title
- A detection of sundrie foule errours, lies, sclaunders, corruptions, and other false dealinges, touching doctrine, and other matters vttered and practized by M.Iewel, in a booke lately by him set foorth entituled, a defence of the apologie. &c. By Thomas Harding doctor of diuinitie.
- Author
- Harding, Thomas, 1516-1572.
- Publication
- Lovanii :: Apud Ioannem Foulerum,
- Anno 1568.
- Rights/Permissions
-
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
- Subject terms
- Jewel, John, 1522-1571. -- Defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande.
- Catholic Church -- Apologetic works.
- Link to this Item
-
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A02637.0001.001
- Cite this Item
-
"A detection of sundrie foule errours, lies, sclaunders, corruptions, and other false dealinges, touching doctrine, and other matters vttered and practized by M.Iewel, in a booke lately by him set foorth entituled, a defence of the apologie. &c. By Thomas Harding doctor of diuinitie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A02637.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 1, 2024.
Pages
Page 322
Harding.
You haue abused Eusebius. For he leaueth not there, but goeth forward, shewing, what he ment by his word,* 1.2 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, whiche you turne, is a bastard. But Ruffinus more ciuilly translated it, à nōnullis non recipitur, The epi∣stle is not receiued of some men. And Eusebius him selfe addeth: Nos tamē scinius etiā istas cū caeteris publicè apleris{que} fuisse Ecclesiis receptas. Yet we know that S. Iames, and S. Iudes Epistles with the rest, haue ben publikely receiued of most Churches, wherby we learne that Eusebius meāt by the worde, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, asmuch to say, as it is accompted of some men, not to be S. Iames owne. Touching his owne iudgement, he sheweth him selfe to be of the opi∣nion, that it is S. Iames epistle. Of some, he cōfesseth by those wordes, that it was doubted of. Therfore you haue reported Eusebius vntruly, making him to pronounce negatiuely of the epistle, which directly he hath not don.
Notes
-
* 1.1
S. Iames epistle.
-
* 1.2
li. 2. c. 23. li. 2. c. 23.