euen the most perfect and Apostolike life was not ex∣empted from this subiection, as Christe him selfe was subiect to Joseph and the virgin Marie: and exercisinge xxx. yeares after his diuine vocation, he reiected not frō his trayne his mother, his Auntes, and cousines, but called them and entertayned them with him (I meane the poore) of the reuenues which men presented him withall: no lesse did the Apostles to their parentes and kinred, of whom, the greatest part which were maried (according to Jgnatius) caried with them their wyues, and nourished them togyther with their parentes and poore, of the Apostolicall reuenue. For, as who holdes no accompte of his houshold and domestical familiars, is as an apostate, and more wicked then if he were an infidell: so, wee ought not wickedly and wrongfully thinke, that the Gospell takes away any humanitie & naturall pietie, but rather nourisheth, susteyneth, and confirmes it, making it spirituall in true loue and due∣tie, and so much ye more perfect, as the doctrine is more excellent, then the doctrine of nature and Moyses.
It is a question of many, whether a man is more boūd to nourishe and succour his father & mother, or his pro∣per wife: whereunto may bée aunswered, that in the case of obedience and subuention, there is more bounde of dutie to parents, but not touching cohabitation. And to proue the bonde of dutie to parentes, it is certayn, by treble right, naturall, diuine, and humane, which inclu∣ding an immutable and inuiolable bonde, can not bée weakened or abolished by mariage, aswell for that it is the first, most autentike, and hath a t••eble bonde (for euery law hath his proper obligacion and subiection, where this hath but one, touching corporall cohabitaci∣on), as also for that it bindes mariage with a new sub∣iectiō, that the wife with her husband, ought to straine all their power and meanes to reléeue suche as by ma∣riage are made their father and mother, and to helpe