the Apostles, the Nicene or Constantinopolitane, and that of Athanasious. Although the Roman Cardinall might justly be blamed, who caused his Painter to draw King Solomon halfe in heaven and halfe in hell: yet I sup∣pose they could not justly be censured, who should draw Popery or the Church of Rome, as she is at this day, partly in heaven, and partly in hell; in heaven in respect of those heavenly truthes which she maintaineth with us against Atheists, Jewes, Turkes, and all sorts of Infidels, and many ancient Heretiques; but in hell in respect of many pernicious and hellish errours, which she pertinaciously defendeth against the cleere letter of Scripture, and doctrine and practice of the Primitive Church. The blessed Apostle resolveth a like question concerning the Jewes, who received the Old Testament, but rejected the New in a like man∣ner: As concerning the Gospell they are enemies for your sake: but as touch∣ing the election they are beloved for the Fathers sake. Wee can hardly come off this controversie upon better tearmes than these, that Papists, as concer∣ning the principles of the common faith, are Christians; but as touching their proper errours by addition to it, detraction from it, corruption of it, they are no Christians. You wil say this is no simple or direct answer: neither need it so to be, because the question is not simple. As it is superfluous to give a mixt or double answer to a simple question, so it is dangerous to give a simple and single answer to a mixt question, or a question of a mixt sub∣ject. 1 For instance, let the question be concerning Ayat the Jew, who used indifferently either of his hands as we use our right hand; Whether was he a right handed or a left handed man? 2 Or concerning a part of speech, which taketh part of a noune, and part of a verbe: Whether is it a noune or a verbe? 3 Or concerning a Myrmaid, which in the upper part resembleth a maid, in the lower a fish: Whether is it a fish or a maid? 4 Or concerning the Muscovy Monster, which feedeth like a sheepe, yet groweth like a plant, and hath his root affixed to the earth: Whether is it a beast or a plant? 5 Or concerning an Androgyne, that hath in it both sexes: Whether is it a man or a woman? 6 Or concerning the apple men∣tioned by Seneca, that hath in it a middle kinde of taste, bitterish at first, and sweetish at last: Whether is it a sweet or a bitter fruit?
To the first we must not answer simply, that he was a right handed or left handed man, but as the Historian termeth him, an Ambodexter.
To the second we must not answer simply, that it is a noune, or a verbe, but as the Grammarians call it, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, participium, a participle.
To the third we must not answer simply, that it is a maid, or a fish, but with the Poet a Syren; in some respect a maid, in some a fish.
Prima hominis facies, & pulchro corpore virgo
Pube tenus, postremâ immani corpore pistrix.
To the fourth we must not answer simply, that it is a plant, or a beast, but with the Geographer, a Plantanimall.
To the fift we must not answer simply, that it is a man, or a woman, but with the naturall Philosopher, an Hermaphrodite.
To the sixt we must not answer simply, that it is a sweeting, or a bitter