A treatise of civil policy: being a resolution of forty three questions concerning prerogative, right and priviledge, in reference to the supream prince and the people. / By Samuel Rutherford professor of divintiy of St Andrews in Scotland.

About this Item

Title
A treatise of civil policy: being a resolution of forty three questions concerning prerogative, right and priviledge, in reference to the supream prince and the people. / By Samuel Rutherford professor of divintiy of St Andrews in Scotland.
Author
Rutherford, Samuel, 1600?-1661.
Publication
London, :: Printed and are to be sold by Simon Miller at the Star in St Pauls Church-yard near the West end.,
1657 [i.e. 1656]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Church and state -- Early works to 1800.
Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1649-1660 -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"A treatise of civil policy: being a resolution of forty three questions concerning prerogative, right and priviledge, in reference to the supream prince and the people. / By Samuel Rutherford professor of divintiy of St Andrews in Scotland." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/a92147.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 21, 2024.

Pages

QUEST. XXXVII. Whether or no it be lawfull that the Estates of Scotland help their op∣pressed brethren the Parliament and Protestants in England a∣gainst Papists and Prelates now in Armes against them, and kil∣ling them, and ndevouring the establishment of Poperie, though the King of Scotland should inhibit them?

MArianus saith, one is obliged to help his brother, non vincul essicace, not with any efficacious band, because in these (saith he) non est actio at poena, one may not have action of law against his brother, who refuseth to help him; yet (saith he) as man he is ob∣liged to man nexu civilis societatis, by the bond of humane society. Others say, one nation may indirectly defend a neighbour nation against a common enemie, because it is a self-defence; and it is pre∣sumed that a forraigne enemie having overcome the neighbour na∣tion, shall invade that nation it selfe who denyeth help and succour to the neighbour nation, this is a self-opinion, and to me it looketh not like the spiritall Law of God.

3. Some say it is lawfull, but not alwayes expedient, in which opinion there is this much truth, that if the neighbor nation have an evil cause, neque licet, neque expedit, it is neither lawfull, nor expedient.

Page 379

But what is lawful in the case of necessity so extreame, as is the losse of a brothers life or of a nation, must be expedient, because necessity of non-sinning maketh any lawfull thing expedient. As to help my brother in fire or water, requiring my present and speedy help though to the losse of my goods must be as expedient, as a negative commandement (Thou shalt not murther.)

4. Others think it lawfull in the case that my brother seek my help only, other wayes I have no calling thereunto: to which opi∣nion, I cannot universally subscribe, it is holden both by reason, and the soundest divines, that to rebuke my brother of sinne is (actus mi∣sericordiae, & charitatis,) an act of mercy and charity to his soul, yet I hold I am obliged to rebuke him by Gods law. Levit. 19. 17. otherwise I hate him. 1 Thes. 5. 14. Col. 4. 17. Math. 18. 15. Nor can I think in reason, that my duty of love to my brother, doth not oblige me but upon dependency on his free consent, but as I am to help my neighbours oxe out of a ditch, though my neighbour know not, and so I have onely his implicit and virtuall consent, so is the case here. I go not farther in this case of conscience, if a neighbour nation be jealous of our help, and in an hostile way should oppose us in helping, (which blessed be the Lord, the honourable houses of the Parliament of England hath not done, though Malignant spirits tempted them to such a course,) what in that case we should owe to the afflicted members of Christs body, is a case may be determined easily.

The fift and last opinion is of those who think if the King com∣mand Papists and Prelates to rise against the Parliament and our dear brethren in England in warres, that we are obliged in consci∣ence, and by our oath and covenant, to help our native Prince against them, to which opinion with hands and feet I should accord, if our Kings cause were just and lawfull, but from this it followeth that we must thus far judge of the cause, as concerneth our consciences in the matter of our necessary duty, leaving the judiciall cognizance to the honourable Parliament of England. But because I cannot re∣turne to all these opinions particularly, I see no reason but the Civil Law of a Kingdom doth oblige any Citizen to help an inno∣cent man against a murthering robber, & that he may be judicially ac∣cused as a murtherer who faileth in his duty, & that Solon said well, beatam remp. esse illam, in quâ quisque injuriam alterius suam estimet. It is a blessed society in which every man is to repute an injury done a∣gainst

Page 380

a brother, 〈…〉〈…〉 injury done against himself. As the Egyptians had a good law, by which, he was accused upon his head, who helped not one that suffered wrong; and if he was not able to help, he was holden to accuse the injurer, if not, his punishment was whips, or three dayes hunger, it may be upon this ground it was that Moses flew the Egyptian. Ambrose commendeth him for so doing.

Assert. We are obliged, by many bands, to expose our lives, goods, children, &c. in this cause of religion and of the unjust oppression of enemies, for the safety and defence of our deare brethren and true religion in England. 1. Prov. 24. 11. If thou for∣bear to deliver them, that are drawn to death, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 taken as captives to be killed, and those that are ready to be slaine. 12. If thou say, behold we know it not, doth not he that pondereth the heart consider it? and he that keepeth thy soul, doth he not know it? and shall he not render to every man, according to his work? Master Iermin on the place, is too narrow, who commenting on the place, restricteth all to these two, that the priest should deliver, by interceding for the in∣nocent, and the King by pardoning only. But 1. to deliver is a word of violence, as 1 Sam. 30. 18. David by the sword rescued his wives, Hos. 5 14. I will take away, and none shall rescue. 1 Sam. 17. 35. I rescued the lambs out of his mouth, out of the Lyons mouth, which be∣hoved to be done with great violence. 2 King. 18. 34. They have not delivered 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Samaria out of my hand. So Cornel. à Lapide, Charitas suad••••, ut vi & armis eruamus injuste ductos ad mortem. Ambros. lib. 1. offic. c. 36. citeth this same text, and com∣mendeth Moses who killed the Egyptian in defending a Hebrew man. 2. It is an act of Charity and so to be done, though the judge for∣bid it, when the innocent is unjustly put to death.

Object. But in so doing private men may offer violence to the law∣full magistrate, when he unjustly putteth an innocent man to death, and rescue him out of the hands of the magistrate, and this were to bring in anarchy and confusion, for if it be an act of charity to deliver the in∣nocent out of the hand of the Magistrate, it is homicide to a private man not to do it, for our obedience to the law of nature tyeth us abso∣lutely, though the Magistrate forbid these acts, for it is known, that I must obey God rather then man.

Answ. The law of nature tyeth us to obedience in acts of charity, yet not to performe these acts after any way and manner, in a meere naturall way, impetu naturae, but I am to performe acts of naturall

Page 381

charity in a rationall and prudent way, and in looking to Gods law, else if my brother or father were justly condemned to die, I might violently deliver him out of the Magistrates hand, but by the contrary, my hand should be first on him, without naturall compas∣sion. As if my brother or my wife have been a blasphemer of God, Deut. 13. 6, 7, 8. and therefore am I to do acts naturall, as a wise man observing (as Solomon saith Eccles. 8. 5.) both time and judgement. Now it were no wisdom for one private man to hazard his own life, by attempting to rescue an innocent brother, because he hath not strength to do it, and the law of nature obligeth me not to acts of charity, when I in all reason, see them unpossible, but a multitude who had strength did well to rescue innocent Ionathan out of the hands of the King, that he should not be put to death: yet one man was not tyed by the law of nature to rescue Ionathan, if the King and Prince had condemned him, though unjustly.

2. The hoast of men that helped David against King Saul, 1 Sam. 22. 2. entered in a lawfull war, and 1 Chron. 12. 18. Amasa by the spirit of the Lord blesseth his helpers, peace, peace be unto thee, and peace be to thy helpers, for thy God helpeth the. Ergo, Peace must be to the Parliament of England, and to their helpers their brethren of Scotland.

3. Numb. 32. 1. 2. 3. 16. 17. 18. 19. Iosh. 1. 12. 13. 14. The chil∣dren of Gad, and of Reuben, and the half tribe of Manasseh, though their inheritance fell to be in this side of Iordan, yet they were to goe over the river armed to fight for their brethren, while they had also possession of the land, at the commandement of Moses and Joshua.

4. So Saul and Israel helped the men of Iabesh Gilead conjoyn∣ed in blood with them, against Nahash the Ammonite, and his unjust conditions in plucking out their right eyes, 1 Sam. 11.

5. Iephtha Iudg. 12. 2. justly rebuketh the men of Ephraim be∣cause they would not help him and his people, against the Am∣monites.

6. If the communion of Saints be any bound, that England and we have one Lord, one faith, one Baptisme, one head and Saviour Iesus Christ, then are we obliged to help our bleeding sister Church, a∣gainst these same common enemies Papists and Prelates, but the former is undenyably true, for 1. We send help to the Rotchel, if there had not been a secret betraying of our brethren, we send help to the recovery of the Palatinate, and the aide of the confederat

Page 382

Princes against Babels strength and power, and that lawfully, but we did it at great leisure and coldly. Q. Elizabeth helped Holland against the King of Spain. And beside the union in Religion. 1. We sayle in one ship together, being in one Iland, under one King; and now by the mercy of God, have sworne one Covenant, and so must stand or fall together.

7. We are obliged by the union betwixt the Kingdomes con∣cluded to be by the Convention of the Estates of Scotland, An. 1585. at the desire of the Generall Assembly, 1583. to joyne forces toge∣ther at home, and enter in League with Protestant Princes, and E∣states abroad, to maintaine the Protestant Religion, against the bloody confederacy of Trent; and accordingly this League be∣tweene the two Crownes was subscribed at Berwick, An. 1586. and the same renewed, An. 1587, 1588. as also the confession of Faith subscribed, when the Spanish Armado was on our coasts.

8. The Law of God, commanding that we love our neighbour as our selfe, and therefore to defend one another against unjust vio∣lence. l. ut vim. ff. de just. & jur. obligeth us to the same, except we thinke God can be pleased with lippe-love in word onely, which the Spirit of God condemneth, 1 Ioh. 2. 9, 10. cap. 3. 16. and the summe of Law and Prophets, is that as we would nor men should refuse to help us, when we are unjustly oppressed, so neither would we so serve our afflicted brethren. l. in facto ff. de cond. & demonstr. § Siuxor. Iustit. de nupt.

9. Every man is a keeper of his brothers life, there is a voluntary homicide, when a man refuseth food or physick necessary for his owne life, and refuseth food to his dying brother; and men are not borne for themselves. And when the King defendeth not subjects against their enemies, all fellow-subjects, by the law of Nature, of Nations, the Civill, and cannon Law, have a naturall priviledge to defend one another, and are mutuall Magistrates to one another, when there be no other Magistrates. If an Army of Turks or Pa∣gans would come upon Britaine, if the King were dead, as he is ci∣villy dead in this juncture of time, when he refuseth to helpe his subjects, one part of Britaine would help another: As Iehoshaphat King of Iudah did right in helping Ahab and Israel, so the Lord had approved of the warre. If the left hand be wounded, and the left eye put out, nature teacheth that the whole burden of naturall acts is devolved on the other hand and eye, and; so are they obliged to helpe one another.

Page 383

10. As we are to beare one anothers burthens, and to help our enemies, to compassionate strangers; so far more these, who make one body of Christ with us.

11. Meroz is under a curse, who helpeth not the Lord, one part of a Church another. A woe lieth on them that are at ease in Zion, and helpeth not afflicted Ioseph, so farre as they are able.

12. The law of Gratitude obligeth us to this: England sent an Armie to free both our soules and bodies from the bondage of Po∣pery, and the fury of the French, upon which occasion a Parliament at Leith, Anno 1560. established Peace and Religion, and then af∣ter they helped us against a faction of Papists, in our owne bosome; for which we take Gods name in a prayer, seeking grace never to forget that kindnesse.

13. When Papists in Armes, had undone England (if God give them victory) they should next fall on us, and it should not be in the Kings power to resist them. When our enemies within two dayes journey are in Armes, and have the person of our King, and his judgement, and so the breathing Law of the two Kingdomes under their power, we should but sleepe to be killed in our nest, if we did not arise and fight for King, Church, Countrey, and Bre∣thren.

Object. By these and the like grounds, when the Kings Royall Person and life is in danger, he may use Papists as subjects, not as Pa∣pists in his owne naturall self-defence.

Answ. Hell and the Devill cannot say, that a thought was in any heart, against the Kings person: He sleeped in Scotland safe, and at Westminster in his owne Palace, when the Estates of both King∣domes, would not so much as take the water-pot from his bed-side, and his Speare; and Satan instilled this traiterous lye, first in Pre∣lates, then in Papists. 2. The King professeth his maintenance of the true Protestant Religion, in his Declarations, since he tooke Armes; but if Saul had put Armes in the hands of Baals Priests, and in an Armie of Sidonians, Philistims, Ammonites, professing their quarrell against Israel was not to defend the King, but their Dagon and false gods; cleere it were, Sauls Armie should not stand in relation of helpers of the Kings, but of advancers of their owne Religion. Now Irish Papists and English in Armes, presse the King to cancell all Lawes against Popery, and make Laws for the

Page 384

free liberty of Masse, and the full power of Papists, then the King must use Papists as Papists in these warres.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.