see, Rob. Rigges professour of diuinitie, and Vicechan∣cellor of the vniuersitie of Oxforde, greeting with due honour.
Your letters bearing the date of the 14. of Iuly I haue receaued: By the authoritie wherof, I haue denounced and caused to be de∣nounced effectually, the foresayd Nicholas and Phillip, to haue bene and to be excommunicate publikely and solemnly in the Church of S. Mary: and in the schooles, and to be cited also per∣sonally, if by any meanes they might be apprehended, according as you commaunded. But after dilligent search layd for them of my part to haue them personally cited and apprehended, I coulde not finde neyther the sayd M. Nicholas, not M. Phillip: who haue hyd or conuayed themselues, vnknowing to me, as here is well knowne. Whereof I thought here to geue signification to your Fatherhoode.
Sealed and testified with the seale of mine office. From Oxford the 25. of Iuly.
In y• meane time Nicholas Herford, and Repington being repulsed of the Duke, and destitute (as was sayde) of his supportation, whether they were sent, or of theyr owne accorde went to the archbish. it is vncertayne. This I finde in a letter of the foresayd archbishop, contayned in his register: that Repington the the 23. day of October the same yeare 1382. was reconciled agayne to the Archbishop and also by his generall letter was released and admitted to his scholasticall actes in the vniuersitie. And so was also Iohn Ashton, of whom (Christ willing) more shall follow hereafter. Of Nicholas Herford all this while I finde no speciall relation.
In the meane time, about the 23. of the month of Sep∣tember the sayd yeare, the king sent his mandate to the Archbishop for collecting of a subsidie and to haue a con∣uocation of the clergie sommoned, against the next parlia∣ment, which should begin the 18. day of Nouember. The Archb. likewise on the 15. day of October, directed his let∣ters monitorie (as the maner is) to Robert Braybroke bi∣shop of London, to geue the same admonition to al his suf∣fraganes and other of the Clergie within his prouince for the assembling of the conuocatiō aforesayd. All which done and executed, the parliamēt begon being holden at Oxford the 18. day of Nouember, where the conuocation was kept in the Monastery of Frideswide in Oxforde. In the which conuocation, the Archbishop with the other bishops there sitting in their Pontificalibus, declared two causes of that their present assembly, whereby (sayth he) to represse he∣resies, which began newly in the realme to spring, and for correcting other excesses in the Churche. The other cause (sayd he) was to ayde and support the king with some ne∣cessary subsidie of mony to be gathered, whiche thus decla∣red, the conuocation was continued till the day following which was the 19. of Nouember.
At the sayd day and place, the Archbishop with the o∣ther Prelates assembling themselues as before: The arch∣bishop after the vsed solemnitie, willed the procuratoures of the clergy appoynted for euery dioces, to consult within themselues, in some conuenient seuerall place, what they thought for theyr partes touching ye redresse of thinges, to be notified and declared to him and to his brethren. &c.
Furthermore, forsomuch (sayth he) as it is so noysed through all the realme, that there were certayn in the vni∣uersitie of Oxford, which did hold and mayntayne conclu∣sions (as he called them) heretical and erroneous condem∣ned by him, and by other lawyers and doctours of Diui∣nitie. He therfore assigned the bishops of Saram, Herford and Rochester, with William Rugge then Vicechauncel∣lour of the Vniuersitie of Oxford (for belike Robert Rigge was then displaced) as also William Berton, and Iohn Midleton Doctors: geuing them hys full authoritie wyth cursing and banning, to compell them to search and to en∣quire with all diligence and wayes possible, ouer all & sin∣gular whatsoeuer, eyther Doctors, Bachellers, or schol∣lers of the sayd vniuersitie, which did hold, teache, mayn∣taine and defend, in schooles or out of schooles, the sayd cō∣clusions heretical (as he called them) or erroneous, and af∣terward to geue certificat truely and playnly touching the premisses. And thus for that day the assembly brake vp to the next, and so to the next, and the third being monday, the 24. day of Nouember. Ex. Regist. W. Courtney.
On the which day, in the presence of the Prelates and the clergy in the chapter house of Saint F••ideswide, came in Phillip Repington (otherwise called of the brethren afterward Rampington) who their abiured the conclusi∣ons and assertions aforesayd, in this forme of wordes as followeth.
In Dei nomine Amen. I Phillip Repington, Canon of the house of Leicester, acknowledging one catholique and Apostolick sayth do curse and also abiure all heresie, name∣ly these heresies and errours vnder written, condemned & reproued by the decrees canonicall, and by you most reue∣rend father, touching which hitherto I haue ben•• dissamed: condemning moreouer & reprouing both them and the au¦thors of them, & doe confesse the same to be catholically cō∣demned: And sweare also by these holy Euangelics, which here I hold in my hand, and do promise, neuer by any per∣swasions of men, nor by anye way hereafter, to defend or hold as true, anye of the sayd conclusions vnder written: but do & will stand and adhere in all thinges, to the deter∣mination of the holy Catholicke Church, and to yours, in this behalfe. Ouer and besides, all suche as stand contrary to this fayth, I doe pronounce them with their doctrine & followers worthy of euerlasting curse. And if I my selfe shall presume at any time to hold or preach any thinge con∣trary to the premisses. I shall be content to abide the seue∣ritie of the Canons. Subscribed with mine owne hand, & with mine own accord. Phillip Repington. And thus the sayd Rampington was discharged, who afterward was made Byshop of Lincolne, and became at length the most bitter and extreme persecutor of this side, of al the other bi∣shops wtin the realm, as in proces hereafter may appeare.
After the abiuration of this Repington, immediately was brought in Iohn Ayshton, student of Diuinitie: who being examined of those conclusions, and willed to say hys mynde, aunswered: that he was to simple and ignoraunt, and therefore would not, and could not answere any thing clearely or distincktly to those conclusions. Wherupon, the Archb, assigned to him Doctor W. Rugge the Vicechaun∣cellour, and other deuines such as he required himselfe to be instructed in the mistery of those conclusions against the after no one: who then appearing again after dinner before the archbishop and the Prelates, did in like sort and forme of wordes abiure as did Repington before.
Of this Iohn Ayshton we read, that afterwarde by Tho. Arundell Archb. of Cant. he was cited and condem∣ned, but whether he dyed in prisō, or was burned, we haue yet no certainty to shewe. This is certayne by the playne wordes of the chronicle of S. Albans, that when the arch. with his doctors and fryers ••ate in examination vpon this sayd Iohn Ashton, in London: the Londiners brake open the dore of the conclaue, ipsum{que} Archiepiscopum in ciuitate sedentem impediuerunt, cum processum fecissit contra Iohannē Ashton. &c. That is and did let the Archbishop himselfe sit∣ting in the Citty of London, when he woulde haue made processe agaynst Iohn Asheton. an. 1382. And thus muche of Iohn Asheton.
As touching Nicholas Herford during the time of this conuocation, he did not appeare: and therefore had the sen∣tence of excommunication. Agaynst which he put hys ap∣peale from the archb. to the king and his Counsaile. The Archb. would not admit it, but finding stayes and stoppes caused him to be apprehended and enclosed in prison. Not∣withstanding through the will of God, and good meanes he escaped out of the prison returning agayn to his former exercise, and preaching as he did before, albeit in as couert and secret maner as he could. Whereupon the Archbishop thundring out his boltes of excōmunication agaynst him, sendeth to al pastors and ministers, willing thē in al chur∣ches, and all festiuall dayes, to diuulge the sayd his excom∣munication against him, to al men. Writeth moreouer and sendeth speciall charge to al and singular of the laity, to be∣ware that theyr simplicity be not deceaued by his doctrine, but that they like Catholicke children will auoyd him, and cause him of all other to be auoyded.
Furthermore, not contented with this, addresseth also his letters vnto the king, requiring also the ayde of his tē∣porall sword to chop of hys neck, whō he had already cast down. See and note reader, the seraphicall charitie of these priestly prelates towardes ye poore redemed flock of Christ And yet these be they whiche washing theyr handes wyth Pylate, say and pretend: Nobis non licet interficere quenquā. It is not our partes to kill any man. The copye of the let∣ter written to the king, is this.
The letter of the Archbishop to the king.
TO the most excellent prince in Christ, &c. William &c. gree∣ting in him by whom kinges do reigne, & princes beare rule.
Vnto your kingly celsitude by the tenour of these presentes we intimate, that one M Nich. Herford D. of diuinitie, for his mani∣fest contumacie and offēce in not appearing before vs being cal∣led at the day and place assigned, therefore is inwrapped in the sentence of the greater curse, publiquely by our ordinary autho∣ritie. And in the same sentence hath continued nowe forty dayes, & yet still continueth with indurate hart, wickedly contemning