they do not partake in any common co-resemblance of Principles, or properties. There∣fore the thingliness or essence of Bodies containeth not a whit of Knowledge or Light, that the Soul may know or acknowledge, or behold it self, but only by a renouncing, which is a certain despairing and banishment of knowledge, whence also it gets no light unto it self from that which is above, or from that which is contrary to it self, nor also doth it strike a light of understanding for it self, as it were out of a Steel and Flint: Because the manner of knowing the Soul is to be begged from the Father of Lights, and not from else-where: Because it was the good pleasure of the Divine will, that Man should not fetch the knowledge of himself from any other thing, than from the Beginning and Fountain, himself, who is the Beginning Mean, End, Scope, and highest vertical point of all Phylosophy, unto which all knowledge is to be as an addition. But further, the essential knowledges (and those from a former thing or cause) of Sublunary things, are quite as darksome, covered, and difficult, as is the very conceiving of the immortal mind, if the essences of things from a former thing, & their causes, be known only to God. Therefore it is simply false, that the knowing of the mind is more difficult, than the naked knowing of things, or therefore to be put after them: Because all things are alike unknown to us, because the essence of all Be∣ings whatsoever, is their precise Truth, shut up to us-ward, and laying open unto that which is infinite. Therefore the knowledge of things is to be measured at the bal∣lance; all corporeal things are primarily strangers, and forreigners to our mind, and [unspec 5] therefore more remote from the mind, than the mind from it self.
And moreover, other things, are not to be known but by the mind, and first in the mind: for therefore the knowledge of any things whatsoever, is only a certain observation, from whence we frame discourses according to every ones capacity. Wherefore also, every such observation, and discourse fetched from hence, how po∣lished soever, is only from a latter thing or the effect, & far less illustrated than is the ob∣servation which is had from the mind. For who ever of mortals, knew what the water [unspec 6] may be? The which notwithstanding, is the most obvious, manifest, visible, and transparent of created things: for a Country-man, or Idiot, knows as much of it as a Phylosopher: For they do equally conceive of it by the observation of the senses, that it is a Body, weighty, liquid, moist, giving place to ones finger, fluid, and re∣closing it self upon the removing of the finger, a receiver of Heat, and extenuable in∣to a vapour; yet none hath known the internal thingliness of the Water, or why it is [unspec 7] liquid or moist: even as indeed, we know the circumstances both vital and intelle∣ctual: of the mind, and what things do dispose this its own prison unto various altera∣tions, and which do oft-times produce something seminally, out of its concrete or composed Body: So as when the appetite of a Woman with Child doth produce a Cherry on her young, which flourisheth every Year. Also in that we do moreover, know more of the Soul than of the Water, it is that which is known by the Revelation of Faith:
To wit, That the mind is a Spiritual substance, also subsisting by it self without a Bo∣dy, Immortal, Living, made after the Image or likeness of God, immediately by God himself, giving Sense, as also motion to the Organs, and the which being sepe∣rated from the Body, doth perceive without Organs at its beck or pleasure, being a∣ble also to move out of it self, and the Body being bridled or restrained, is able to produce a Being out of it self (as hath been already shewn concerning a Woman with Child) it understanding, also willing, and remembring, &c.
The Observations of which Properties and Functions, are far more strong than is the knowledge of the Water: otherwise, all things and every of things, by an in∣trinsecal understanding, are equally unknown and unpassable to us.
But that which hath Seduced Predecessours, by thinking that the knowing of the Water was easier than that of the mind, hath proceeded from an Opinion, That a visible thing is of necessity more known than an invisible thing: But they have not [unspec 8] distinguished the Knowledge of Observation, from the Internal Knowledge of essence or thingliness, according to which, all things are equally unknown unto us.
They have not known I say, that the knowledge of Observation, doth not intro∣duce an understanding into the essential thingliness of a thing, but erecteth only a thinkative knowledge: For otherwise, the understanding should perceive causes that are before in essence. Then also they have been deceived by the simplicity of the Water, which simpleness they have confounded with the unity of knowledge to us