Exam: of Chap. 63. replying to Chap. 66. (Book 63)
MAster Cotton here being understood to smile on Q: Elizabeth for persecuting the Papists, and to ••••••wne on K: James for persecuting the (so named) Puritans, he denies neither, but insists onely upon the Number, that as many and as great Princes are against Tolleration as for it, and in particular Q: Elizabeth and K: James.
I say (as before) I should never use an Argument* 1.1 from the Number of Princes (no more then from the Number of any other men) for any truth of Christ Jesus: Who as he was not pleased himselfe to be borne of the sons of Nobles, so hath he not chosen many Nobles and Wise men of this World to be borne of him: Yet 2. If that be his Argument, he hath not sa∣tisfied, in naming these two, for more were named by the Pri∣soner, and besides one of those Witnesses, K: James abundantly declared himselfe, not onely against persecuting of Papists, but against all persecution in generall, what ever otherwise or after∣wards his practices were against some Persons, as Mr Cotton too truely alledgeth.
In the next Passage the Discusser having objected that both Q: Elizabeth and K: James did persecute according to their Consciences, and arguing why should the one (namely) K: James be more blamed for persecuting according to his Con∣science, then Q: Elizabeth for persecuting according to hers: Mr Cotton distinguisheth of Consciences: The Queenes sayth he, was rightly informed, but the Kings was not. When it was reply∣ed,