et Abusus Curiae Romanae p. 14. to 27. by the resolutions of divers French
Councels, Synods, and Edicts of Parliament, cited by Laurentius Bochellus,
Decreta Eccles. Gal. l. 5. Tit. 20. cap. 17. 19, 20, 21. 29. 33, 34, 35. 38, 39.
41. 43, 44, 45, 46. & by the Code of the Liberty of the French Church (there
quoted) resolving in these positive termes. Soliti sunt ab omni aeuo Reges
Christianissimi, pro ratione rerum quae in Regno suo accidunt, habere Synodos, aut
Concilia Provincialia aut Nationalia, in quibus inter alia ad statum Regni perti∣nontia,
agitur etiam de Rebus ordinem & Disciplinam Ecclesiarum Regni sui
spectantibus. Unde Regulae innumerae, Capitula, Leges, Ordinationes & Pragmaticae
Sanctiones eorum Nominibus inscriptae prodierunt. Yea theirRelect. 4. p. 161.Franciscus Victoria
holds, that at this day in certain cases a generall Councell may be called a∣gainst
the Popes minde, by the Emperor and Christian Princes, whether hee
will or no. But although some Parasites of the Popes universall Monarchy,
endeavour to entitle him to this prerogative royall of Christian Princes, to
summon Synods and Councels, (contrary to the Resolutions of these and
infinite other Popish Authors, and the practise of most popish Realmes)
yet none of them entitle any other Bishops or Prelates to it but the Pope
alone, unlesse it be by some speciall derivation from the Pope as his Legate;
so that Bishops cannot claime this power by any immediate inherent
right, but by a dirivative power onely, either from the Pope or Christian
Princes: and from the Pope, no English Prelates, Ministers can, or dare
derive it. Thirdly, to proceed to our own English Synods and Councels, wee shall
finde that the right of summoning them and of our Convocations hath al∣wayes
beene an indubitable Prerogative of our Christian Kings or Parlia∣ments,
which I shall manifest. First by presidents. Secondly by Parliamen∣tory
resolutions. Thirdly by the Doctrine, Articles, and Writers of our
Church. Fourthly by the determination of King James, King Charles, and
our late Convocations.To begin first with Presidents, both before and since the Conquest: The great
Bela Eccles. Hist. l. 1. c. 17. & 21. Matth. Westm. An. 449. 465. Spelmanni Concil. p. 48, 49 60.Synod held at verolam Anno 446, to suppresse the Pelagian heresie; with ano∣ther
great Councell after that Anno 449, to like purpose; and the Councell of
Wales Anno 465, were summoned by the Kings and Peoples joint assents who to∣gether
with the Clergie were present and voted in them. TheSpelmanui Concil. p. 104 Matth. West. An. 603. Beda ccles. Aist. l. 2. c. 2 Antiq. Eccl. Brit. p. 3. Speeds Chron p. 286.Synod of Wor∣cester,
and at Augustines Oke, under Augustine the first Arch-bishop of Canter∣bury
Anno 603. was called Ethelberti Regis ope & auxilio, by the assistance or
summons of King Ethelbert; adjutorio usus Edelberti Regis, write some. So
was theSpelman. p. 126, 127.Councell held at Canterbury Anno 605 in which both the Clergy and
people were present. TheBeda Eccles. Hist. l. 3. c. 21. Spelman. p. 14.Synod of Streneshalch An. 664. under Oswy King
of Northumberland, and Alchfrid his Son, who weee present at it, was sum∣moned
by their appointment, to decide the controversie, concerning the time
of Easter, and other differences, Anno 693 KingWillielmus Malms. De Ge∣st Pontif. l. 3. Antiqu. Eccles. . p. 18. 19.Alfrick Synodum Episcopo∣rum
convocari fecit, caused a Synod of Bishops to be called together. Anno 694,
0
|