Amicus reipublicæ. = The Common-Wealths friend or an exact and speedie course to justice and right, and for preventing and determining of tedious law-suits. With many other things very considerable for the good of the publick. All which are fully controverted and debated in law. By John March of Grayes-Inne, barister.
About this Item
Title
Amicus reipublicæ. = The Common-Wealths friend or an exact and speedie course to justice and right, and for preventing and determining of tedious law-suits. With many other things very considerable for the good of the publick. All which are fully controverted and debated in law. By John March of Grayes-Inne, barister.
Author
March, John, 1612-1657.
Publication
London :: Printed by Will. Bentley, for Francis Eglesfield, at the Marygold in S. Pauls Church-yard,
1651.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Law -- England -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A89519.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Amicus reipublicæ. = The Common-Wealths friend or an exact and speedie course to justice and right, and for preventing and determining of tedious law-suits. With many other things very considerable for the good of the publick. All which are fully controverted and debated in law. By John March of Grayes-Inne, barister." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A89519.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 12, 2024.
Pages
descriptionPage 150
Whether the Law of forfeiture of
goods wrecked at Sea, be a reason∣able
Law, or not?
I Am not here to meddle with
Flotsam, that is, where goods float
upon the Sea; nor with Jetsam,
where goods are cast into the Sea to
prevent Shipwreck, nor yet with
Lagan, where they are fastened to
any thing that they may be discover∣ed;
for of these I may say (in regard
it is uncertain upon what Coast they
may be cast, or whether driven) Capi∣at
qui capere potest; ketch that ketch
can, but with wreck of Sea, and that
is such goods onely, which upon a
Shipwreck, are cast or left upon the
Land by the Sea, and this onely is
Wreck.
The ground of this Wreck of Sea,
was, as it is said, that goods being
so wrecked, the property was in no
man, and therefore the Law gave
them to the King, who was Lord of
descriptionPage 151
the narrow Seas, who was bound to
scowr the Seas of Pyrats and petty
Robbers, towards the charge of the
same, this was the foundation of this
Law.
And now it is fit to know, what
the Common Law was before the
Statute of 3. E. 1. D. S. saith, that by
the Common Law goods wrecked
upon the Sea were immediately for∣feited
to the King, but I rather be∣lieve
Bracton lib. 3. 33. 135. that there
shall be no wreck where the owner
comes and avows the goods to be
his; observe there that that is indefi∣nite
at any time, and that were a rea∣sonable
Law. And Cook lib. 5. Sr.
Henry Constables case, it is said, that
the Statute of 3. E. 1. was but a con∣firmation
of the Common Law, then
certainly the Law was the same be∣fore,
as it is now by that Statute.
And by that Statute of 3. E. 1.
cap. 4. concerning wrecks of the Sea,
descriptionPage 152
it is agreed, that where a man, a dog,
or a cat, escape quick out of the
Ship, that such Ship nor Barge, nor
any thing within them, shall be ad∣judged
Wreck, but to be saved and
kept by the Sheriff, &c. so that if
any sue for, and prove the goods
his, within a year and a day, they
shall be restored, otherwise to re∣main
to the King, &c.
So that the Law is, that if but a
Dog or Cat escape alive out of the
Ship, then not to be adjudged
Wreck, otherwise it is. Now to me
this seems a very hard Law, that a
man should lose his estate there be∣ing
no act, or default in him, which
is contrarie to the rule of Law: and
as I have said before, there is an∣other
rule in Law, that the act of
God shall prejudice no man; and for
my part, I cannot judge an Act of
Parliament made against this rule, to
stand with reason. This is afflictio∣nem
descriptionPage 153
afflictis addere, to add affliction
to affliction, and to throw him quite
down that is a falling: certainly there
cannot be any thing more against
reason and Religion, than for to add
burthen to burthen, sorrow to sor∣row:
when the afflicting hand of
God is upon a man, 'tis sad and mi∣serable
to meet with such as Jobs
friends. For a man in an impetuous
dreadfull storm and tempest, to be
tossed to and fro at Sea, by the ra∣ging
and swelling billows thereof,
every moment expecting nothing
but destruction; and at the last, to be
Ship-wrecked and swallowed up in
the merciless deep, and after all, to
have this further aggravation of mi∣serie,
that if nothing escape alive, the
goods to be forfeited, or if any thing
escape alive, if not a man, to be con∣fined
to a year and a day to prove
the propertie, when that it is almost
an impossible thing for friends to be
descriptionPage 154
informed of the sad misfortune, the
men being all cast away; this seems
to me a very hard and strange Law.
But to this it may be said, that the
goods may be bona peritura, and if
libertie should not be given to di∣spose
of them, after such time no
claim being made, they may perish,
and so nobodie be advantaged there∣by.
To this I say, 'tis true, it may be
so; Therefore I conceive it just, as in
case of Estrays, so in this case, that a
Law should be made, by which it
should be provided, that notice
should be given of such a Shipwreck
and such goods taken up, by way of
Proclamation, in all the Port-Towns
and other chief Cities of Merchan∣dise▪
and then if claim be not made
within the same time, the forfeiture
may be more reasonable. And we
ought to be invited to this the ra∣ther,
considering it was the hand of
descriptionPage 155
God which brought this affliction,
and therefore let us not add forfei∣ture
of estate to loss of life, if possi∣bly
it may be prevented. The next
and last thing I shall discourse of, is
Wills, and of that onely by way of
advise.
email
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem?
Please contact us.