Amicus reipublicæ. = The Common-Wealths friend or an exact and speedie course to justice and right, and for preventing and determining of tedious law-suits. With many other things very considerable for the good of the publick. All which are fully controverted and debated in law. By John March of Grayes-Inne, barister.
About this Item
Title
Amicus reipublicæ. = The Common-Wealths friend or an exact and speedie course to justice and right, and for preventing and determining of tedious law-suits. With many other things very considerable for the good of the publick. All which are fully controverted and debated in law. By John March of Grayes-Inne, barister.
Author
March, John, 1612-1657.
Publication
London :: Printed by Will. Bentley, for Francis Eglesfield, at the Marygold in S. Pauls Church-yard,
1651.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Law -- England -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A89519.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Amicus reipublicæ. = The Common-Wealths friend or an exact and speedie course to justice and right, and for preventing and determining of tedious law-suits. With many other things very considerable for the good of the publick. All which are fully controverted and debated in law. By John March of Grayes-Inne, barister." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A89519.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 13, 2024.
Pages
Whether it be a just and reasonable
Law, that Infants under the age of
21 years, shall not be charged with
their debts?
FIrst, we are to know what the age
of discretion is for Man or Wo∣man?
What full age? The age of dis∣cretion
for a woman in judgement of
our Law is 12. for a man 14. full age
descriptionPage 113
is 21. and under that age they are
said to be Infants in Law, and un∣der
that age they have not power to
dispose of their Estates, not are they
liable to pay their own debts; It is
true, that for necessaries, as Cloaths,
Dyet, Schooling, & the like, they are
liable, but for those neither they can∣not
give a penal bond, a Bill they
may, and it shall bind them. In ge∣neral,
an Infant may better his condi∣tion,
he can not make it worse; this I
confess to be Law, yet it seems very
hard to me, that an Infant should not
be liable to pay such debts, as he shall
ow for any thing had, or received af∣ter
the age of discretion; especially,
when I consider what the Law is in
other cases of Infancy.
By custom, he may make a lease at
his age of 15. and it shall bind him.
Cook upon Littleton fol. 45. b. Nay
further, by custom he may make a
descriptionPage 114
Feoffement at 15. years, 5. H. 7. 41.
11. H. 4. 33. Now no custom is Law∣full,
that is not reasonable.
And yet further, an Infant of the
age of discretion, nay under, may suf∣fer
death for Murder, or Theft, no∣thing
more common. 3. H. 7. 12. an
Infant betwixt 10. and 12. gave a
man several wounds till he died, and
then he drew the body into the
Corn; forwhich he was convicted?
but it is true, that judgement in that
case was respited for his tender age,
but many Justices that he was wor∣thy
of death.
Note, an Infant of 9. years killed
another, and it was adjudged, that he
should be hanged, quia malitia sup∣plet
aetatem. But execution was re∣spited
to have pardon; see the Assises.
A Woman Infant within age kil∣led
her Mistris, and was burnt for it,
see likewise the Assises.
descriptionPage 115
Again, an Infant shall not avoid a
marriage at the age of discretion,
made, and contracted by him. Cook
upon Litt. fol. 79.
Now I argue thus; if an Infant may
do the greater, why is it not reason
that he should do the less? If he may
be chargeable for things of a much
higher nature, why not for those that
are of a lower? By custom he may
sell his Estate; By Law, he may suf∣fer
death for Felony: and may con∣tract
Matrimonie; things of much
greater consequence to himself: why
then in reason should he not be liable
to the payment of his debts? my
Lord Gook saith, that argumentum a
majori ad minus, an argument from
the greater to the less, is a good ar∣gument
in Law.
Besides, he is as much obliged in
reason and conscience, to pay his
debts, as a man of full age, why then
descriptionPage 116
the Law should not tie him to it,
I know no reason: I mean for
debts contracted after the age of di∣scretion:
and if the Law then judges
him to be discreet, why should it
not make him just & honest. Men of
themselves naturally are too prone
to injustice and unrighteous dealing
one with another, therefore very un∣fit
that they should receive the least
incouragement to it.
How frequent a thing is it for
men in such case, to take the advan∣tage
of infancy; and most unjustly to
cousen their creditors of their just
debts, which in conscience they are
bound to satisfie.
But here it will be objected, that
it is the creditours fault to trust such
a one who is under age, and there∣fore
if he suffer, he may thank him∣self.
To this I answer, that though the
descriptionPage 117
ignorance of Law will not excuse a
man, the ignorance of fact will, and
how a man should know such a one
to be an Infant, since many, nay
most men may, and do deceive their
Judges by their looks; I cannot think
or imagine. And he that shall in∣quire
his customers age, may sit still
in his shop and blow his fingers, for
any thing else that he shall have to
do. I shall say no more but this,
that certainly, that Law is most just,
that gives the least Liberty or ad∣vantage
of fraud or deceit to men.
The next thing I shall speak of, and
in that I shall be very short, is, Cler∣gy,
and in that I shall propound this
short question.
email
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem?
Please contact us.