§. II.
The deficiency of single Natural Reason argued for Consolation in this case; and the validity of Grace asserted.
WHen I consider the strange undertakings of the Philosophers, me thinks they have charactered to us the power of Natural Reason, in a fabu∣lous figure or Romance, setting it out as vanquishing all cor∣poreal sensibleness, armed with never so many strong afflicti∣ons, dissolving and disinchanting all the Charms and Spells of Passions, although their characters be set never so power∣fully against the efficacy of Reason, which they exhibite in this predominancy, dispersing all Errors, rectifying all oblique Opinions; thus have they fancied the superior part of the minde, inthroned in such power as may easily blow away all ayr, even of any Sedition, that riseth in the inferior Regions of the imaginative or sensitive faculties; Reason remaining in the posture of the Queen of the Revelation, proclaiming, I sit Queen, and am no Widow, and shall see us sorrow.
But they who account upon this Self-sufficiency, shall quickly finde how impracticable these strong speculations will prove, when they are bound, and the Philistines are upon them; that is, inclosed in Solitude, and assailed by Natural distresses and vexations; if they shall then expect such a Her∣cules of their Reason, as they have seen painted by the Stoicks, that should break through all these Monsters, and remain