Page 155
§. III.
The errours of prophane jealousie argued, and a Pious jealousie propounded.
MEthinks passionate lovers, who know nothing so well as the nature of jealousie, (which studyeth con∣tinually the anotamy of hearts, and is so severe to the least defective part,) should not hope to passe any insincerity upon a jealous God, if they did not study too much the qua∣lity of jealousie, and too little the nature of God, for if they attended that, it would shew them God cannot be jealous, ac∣cording to the nature of man, where jealousie implyes doubt and perplexity of inquiry; for to God the secrets of hearts are manifest, even while they are secrets to themselves, he precon∣ceiveth what all hearts shal ever freely conceive; & so God cal∣leth himselfe a jealous God, as knowing the nature of humane jealousie, (which is so sensible of the least substraction from what we affect) to assure us by that title, he can admit no participation in what he vouchsafes to love.
It is to inlighten man in the knowledge of his severity, not to obscure the beliefe of his omniscience, that he cals himselfe a jealous God, which quality is as propitious in Gods love as it is malignant in mans; for humane jealousie among all the falsities it suggests for our disquiet, telleth us but one impor∣tant truth, (and that we seem to believe little by the eagernes of our solicitations) which is the infidelity and variablenesse of all humane loves, that are so unfaithfull, as our greatest passions are commonly unsecured by our tendernesse and cau∣tion of them, and Gods jealousie assureth us of the immuta∣bility of his love, which we can loose onely by our not being jealous of it, for the more watches we set over it in our lips, and the more guards in our hearts, the more it is obliged by this circumspection: nor must we think to keep it safe in our