he make Bishop of Bath and Welles; who was then Bishop of
St. Davids.
Answer. The fall of Lord Keeper Williams, I never say'd
or intended to be in that moment of time, to which that Pa∣ragraph
relates; but principally purposing to deliver therein
his and others exclusion from the Parliament, I mentioned
also his fall as a thing preceding, and no way concurring
with the other. So I was not out in this Temporality; but if I
was not, I am afraid I know who is, in affirming [the great
Seal was taken from him in October] whereas he parted with
it in August, as Mr. Howel in his familiar letters, Sect. 4. l. 23. re∣lates.
But in making Dr. Laud Bishop of Bath and Welles at
that time, I confesse I was mistaken, and this is grande nefas,
an horrid crime no doubt. But, this is not all; for rather then
he will not find another, the Observator fetcheth a running
leap to Fol. 96. where speaking of the Articles of Lambeth, it is
said [they were first sent to the Synod of Dort, and after that
to the Convocation of Ireland; a very strange Hysteron Pro∣teron,
Setting the Convocation of Ireland after the Synod of Dort,
which preceded it three years; and this is somewhat more
then superannuating in his Temporalities] Answer. I write the
History of the Reign of King Charles, and then what I said of
that superannuating, was by me intended (nor can it be ratio∣nally
interpreted otherwaies) of such things and actions as
have reference to the sixteen years whereof I treat in that Hi∣story,
not of such things as antecedently occurr'd, & are taken
in by the By: for I have oft occasion to mention things of pre∣ceding
date, as in the case of the Scottish Presbytery, wherein
though I am guided by the best informers I had, yet will I
not, nor did ever so mean, to warrant the truth thereof, as
to every particular year. So it fareth in this errour, in point
of precedency between a Convocation and a Synod; whereof
to raise a question is only to strive de Lana Caprina, and is at
worst 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, but a meer laps of memory; a thing
as obvious, so withal excusable in the best Authors in point of
circumstance; in such an one especially as this, wherein (as
being extravagant, and out of the bounds of the Principal
Narrative) curiosity was lesse concerned. And this is I hope e∣nough
to keep this errour within the bounds of my confidence
of not superannuating, were the errour infallibly mine own.
But if now▪ after all this ranting triumph, upon a melius inqui∣rendum,
and better search, the errour should prove none of
mine, would not the Observator, think you Reader, be won∣drous
blank at his Ridiculus Mus. Resort to, and Review the
place; then tell me, whither or not in your unbyast sense, That
Paragraph with the former, and three subsequent to it, do