Page 30
CHAP. IV. The Judgment of the Lutherans and Cal∣vinians in these Five Points, with some Objections made against the Conclusions of the Councel of Dort.
I. No Difference in Five Points betwixt the Lutherans and the Church of Rome, as is acknowledged by the Papists themselves. II. The Judgment of the Lutheran Churches in the sayd 5 Points, delivered in the famous Confession of Au∣sperge. III. The distribution of the Quarrel betwixt the Franciscans, Melancthonians, and Arminians, on the one side, the Dominicans, Rigid Lutherans, and Sublapsarian Calvinists on the other; the middle way of Catarinus par∣alleled by that of Bishop Overal. IV. The Doctrine of Predestination as layd down by Calvin, of what ill Conse∣quence in it self, and how odious to the Lutheran Doctors. V. Opposed by Sebastian Castellio in Geneva it self, but pro∣pagated in most Churches of Calvins Plat-form, and after∣wards polished by Perkins, a Divine of England, and in him censured and confuted by Jacob Van Harmine, a Belgick Writer. VI. A brief view of the Doctrine of the Sublapsa∣rians, and the odious Consequences of it. VII. The Judg∣ment of the Sublapsarians▪ in the sayd Five Points, collected and presented at the Conference at the Hague, Ann. 1610. VIII. The Doctrine of the Synodists in the sayd Points. IX. Affirmed to be repugnant to the holy Scripture, as also to the Purity, Mercy, Justice, and Sincerity of Almighty God. X. And the subversion of the Ministry, and all Acts of Piety, illustrated by the example of Tiberius Caesar, and the Lantgrave of Thurin.
I. SUCH being the Doctrines of this Councel in the Points disputed; we need not take much pains in look∣ing