Format 
Page no. 
Search this text 
Title:  The casting down of the last and strongest hold of Satan. Or, A treatise against toleration and pretended liberty of conscience: wherein by Scripture, sound reason, fathers, schoolmen, casuists, Protestant divines of all nations, confessions of faith of the Reformed Churches, ecclesiastical histories, and constant practice of the most pious and wisest emperours, princes, states, the best writers of politicks, the experience of all ages; yea, by divers principles, testimonies and proceedings of sectaries themselves, as Donatists, Anabaptists, Brownists, Independents, the unlawfulnesse and mischeif [sic] in Christian commonwealths and kingdoms both of a vniversal toleration of all religions and consciences, and of a limited and bounded of some sects only, are clearly proved and demonstrated, with all the materiall grounds and reasons brought for such tolerations fully answered. / By Thomas Edvvards, Minister of the Gospel. The first part.
Author: Edwards, Thomas, 1599-1647.
Table of contents | Add to bookbag
and among other things he was a Type in feeding his Father and his Brethren, that when advanced in the kingdome he provided for, and nourished his Fathers house, which typified Iesus Christ feeding the Family of God, and preserving the Church alive. Now though Ioseph in this action was a Type of Christ, and did it typically, yet not only typically, but did this morally and naturally too by vertue of the fifth Commandement, and sixth Commandement, of childrens duty to their Parents, and of pre∣serving life; and by vertue of this example of Ioseph every man in high place and rich, is bound to send for and provide for Fa∣ther and Brethren in a necessitous condition;☜ and suppose now a man in Iosephs condition should have Father and Brethren in want, whom he should neglect, and being pressed by Iosephs ex∣ample to provide for them, he should answer Iosephs practise was nothing to him, for he was a Type of Christ, and typified Christs feeding of his Church not with temporall food only, but with the Manna from Heaven, the word and Sacraments, I aske of those who plead this Argument of typicalnesse, whether this were a good Answer? and if not, neither is theirs against the practise of the kings of Iudah from being Types of Christ; and I wish the Pleaders for Toleration would serious consider of, and resolve this Question, though Ioseph was a speciall Type of Christ, and in this action of preserving his Father and Brethren a Type of Christs preserving his Church, yet whether this acti∣on of his to his Father, Brethren and their children, do not bind now in the dayes of the Gospel children to their Fathers &c. or whether the typicalnesse of it hath caused it to cease? and in the resolution of this case, the ingenuous Reader may see what to judge of the typicalnesse of the kings of Iudah, and that typi∣calnesse of persons and actions does not presently make all such persons and actions that they cannot be examples or rules to o∣thers who are not typicall.☜ The Prophets and Propheticall of∣fice were Types of Christ as well as the kings of Iudah; and yet actions they did that were some way typicall and extraordinary, bind Christians under the Gospel for the substance and matter, and are set before them for example, as Eli a Type, and in his Prayer a Type, yea somewhat in it extraordinary, is by Iames propounded in prayer as a patterne and a proof of effectuall ser∣vent 0