§. IIII.
Of Indulgences.
THus haue we seene the Popes Temporalties, arising from Conspiracies against Empe∣rours, his Collations from the spoile of all Kings and Princes of their Inuestitures, in pretence of Simonie, to further intensions and extensions of Simonie; his Dis∣pensations, [ 10] Factors and Bawds for Compensations, by this Man of Sinne, which thus sinned and kept a Trade, Shop, Mart, Sale, and gaine of Sinne: but that which had least shew of reason, and yet was the right fore-legge of the beast, whereon he had surest standing, whereby he had securest holding his prey, wherewith he made strongest fights against his Ad∣uersaries, was Indulgences. And whereas the Riuer of the Popes Eden, is parted into foure heads, * 1.1 this first compasseth the whole Land of Hauila, where there is Gold, and the Gold of that Land is good. Of which the Author of the Historie of the Councell of Trent, relateth that this manner of gaining Money was put in practise, after Pope Vrban the second had giuen a plenarie Indulgence to all that should make war in the Holy Land; imitated by his Successors, some of which granted it to those that maintained a Souldiour, if they went not in person. And after, the same Indulgences or Pardons [ 20] were giuen, for taking Armes against those that obeyed not the Church of Rome, although they were Christians: and for the most part, infinite exactions were made vnder those pretences, all which, or the greater part were applied to other vses. Thus Pope Leo the tenth, 1517. sent an Indulgence thorow * 1.2 all Christendome, granting it to any which would giue Money and extending it to the dead; for whom his will was, that when the disbursement was made, they should be deliuered from the paines of Purga∣torie: giuing also power to eate Egges and Whitmeats on fasting daies, to chuse themselues a Confessor, and other such like abilities. And although the execution of this enterprise of Leo had some particu∣lar neither pious nor honest, notwithstanding many of the Grants made by the preceding Popes, had causes more vniust, and were exercised with more Auarice and Extortion. He distributed part of the Haruest before it was reaped or well sowne, giuing to diuers persons the Reuenues of diuers Prouinces, [ 30] and reseruing some also for his owne Exchequer. The Indulgences of Saxonie, and from thence to the Sea, be gaue to Magdalene his Sister, Wife vnto Francescheto Cibo, Bastard Sonne of Inno∣cent the eight; by reason of which marriage, this Leo was created Cardinall at the age of foureteene yeares. She to make the best of it, committed the care of preaching the Indulgences, and exacting the Money vnto Aremboldus, a Genoa Merchant, (now a Bishop and Merchant too) who found Mini∣sters like vnto himselfe, who aymed at nothing but game: which would not vse the Hermite Friers (as bad beene the custome of Saxonie in this case) but Dominicans, which to amplifie the value, spake many strange things; and in Tauernes, games, and other things not fit to bee named, spent that which the people spared from their necessarie expences, to purchase the Indulgences. [ 40]
By this meanes Martin Luther an Hermite Frier, first began to speake, first against these new abu∣ses; * 1.3 and after being prouoked by the Pardoners, he set himselfe to studie this matter, being desirous to see the rootes and foundations of the Doctrine of Indulgences. He published ninetie fiue Conclusions herein, to be disputed on in Wittenberg, which none accepted: but Iohn Thecel proposed others con∣trarie in Frankfort of Brandeberg. Luther proceeded to write in defence of his, and Iohn Ecchius to oppose; and these Writings being gone to Rome, Syluester Prierias, a Dominican Frier, wrote against Luther: which contestation inforced both the one and the other partie to passe to other things of grea∣ter importance. For the Doctrine of Indulgences hauing not beene well examined in former Ages, the essence and causes of them were not well vnderstood. Some thought they were nothing but an absolution made by Authoritie of the Prelate from Penance, which the Church in most ancient times imposed * 1.4 by way of Discipline vpon the penitent, (which Imposition was assumed in succeeding Ages by the Bi∣shop [ 50] onely, after delegated to the Penitentiarie Priest, and in conclusion left wholly to the will of the Con∣fessor) and that they deliuered vs not from paying the debt due to the Iustice of God. Others thought, that they freed from both. But these were diuided: some thinking that they freed vs, though nothing were giuen in recompence, others said, that by reason of mutuall participation in charitie of the mem∣bers * 1.5 of holy Church the Penance of one might bee communicated to another, and free him by this Compensation. But because it seemed that this was more proper to men of holy and austere life then to the authoritie of Prelates, there arose a third opinion, which made them in part an absolution, (because authoritie was necessary for them) and in part a Compensation. But because the Prelats liued not in such sort as they could spare much of their Merits to others, there was made a treasurie in the Church, full of the Merits of all those who had more then would serue their owne turne: the dispensation where∣of [ 60] is committed to the Pope, who when he giueth Indulgences, recompenseth the debt of the Sinner, by assigning so much in value out of the Treasure. It being opposed that the Merits of Saints being finite, this treasure might be diminished; they added the Merits of Christ which are infinite: which caused