A new history of ecclesiastical writers containing an account of the authors of the several books of the Old and New Testament, of the lives and writings of the primitive fathers, an abridgement and catalogue of their works ... also a compendious history of the councils, with chronological tables of the whole / written in French by Lewis Ellies du Pin.

About this Item

Title
A new history of ecclesiastical writers containing an account of the authors of the several books of the Old and New Testament, of the lives and writings of the primitive fathers, an abridgement and catalogue of their works ... also a compendious history of the councils, with chronological tables of the whole / written in French by Lewis Ellies du Pin.
Author
Du Pin, Louis Ellies, 1657-1719.
Publication
London :: Printed for Abel Swalle and Tim. Thilbe ...,
MDCXCIII [1693]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Church history.
Fathers of the church -- Bio-bibliography.
Christian literature, Early -- Bio-bibliography.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A69887.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A new history of ecclesiastical writers containing an account of the authors of the several books of the Old and New Testament, of the lives and writings of the primitive fathers, an abridgement and catalogue of their works ... also a compendious history of the councils, with chronological tables of the whole / written in French by Lewis Ellies du Pin." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A69887.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 18, 2024.

Pages

The Pope VIGILIUS.

ALtho Vigilius was promoted to the See of Rome by a way altogether unjust, yet he continued in the possession of it after the Death of Silverius, and was acknowledg'd for a lawful Pope, with∣out proceeding to a new Election, or even confirming that which had been made. The Conduct which he had observed during his Pontificat, answer'd well enough to its unhappy beginning. He had at first approv'd the Doctrine of Anthimus, and that of the Acephali, to satisfie the Empress: but the fear of being turned out by the People of Rome, whom he hated, made him quickly recall this approbation; yet he did not by this gain the hearts of the Romans. They could not endure an Usurper, who having been the cause of the death of their lawful Bishop, would abuse them also: they accused him also of having kill'd his Secretary with a blow of his fist, and of having whipped his Sister's Son till he died. The Empress, who was not satisfied with him, because he had gone back from his word, sent Anthimus to Rome with an Order to bring him into Greece; and at his departure the People gave him all sorts of Imprecations. He was sometime in the Isle of Cicily, and arrived not at Constantinople until the 20th of January of the Year 547. The Affair of the three Chapters was then warmly disputed in the East: and Vigilius having learned in Sicily that they were condemned without his Concurrence, at first was very much troubled at it: He testified his dis∣content after his Arrival at Constantinople, but he quickly yielded to the Menaces and Intreaties of the Empress. Yet he would not grant all that was desired of him, and propos'd a General Council, thinking by that to gain time, without discontenting any body. Notwithstanding this, Justinian publish'd an Edict: Vigilius oppos'd it briskly, and thundred a Sentence of Excommunication against Theodorus of Caesarea, the Author of this Edict, and of Suspension against Mennas. He withstood the Condemnation of the three Chapters which was resolv'd upon in the fifth Council; he suffer'd himself to be banish'd rather then subscribe to it: Nevertheless, not being guided by Zeal for the Truth, but by his own Caprice, or Interest, he quickly condemned them after an Authentical manner, that he might return into Italy. During his absence Rome was taken and sack'd in 547, by Totila, and re∣taken in 553 by Narses General of Justinian's Army. The Romans being set at liberty, demanded their Bishop again, who had been absent now for many years. Justinian offer'd them to send him

Page 48

back again to them, or if they had rather, to permit them to Ordain the Archdeacon Pelagius. They pray'd him to send them Vigilius, pro•…•…g to him that they would choose Pelagius after his Death. Justinian granted him to them. Vigilius •…•…ed in Sicily in 555; Pelagius his Successor was suspected to have contributed to his Death, but he purg'd himself by Oath upon the holy Gospels and the Cross.

We have already observ'd, that Vigilius, to get •…•…rius into his hands, had consented to all that the Empress desir'd by receiving into his Co•…•… the Bishops of the Faction of the Acephali, and approving their Doctrine, Liberatus relates the Letter which he wrote to them, and assures us, that it was accompanied with a Confession of Faith, wherein he condemns those who distinguish'd, the two Natures in Jesus Christ, and made Profession of believing one Christ only compos'd of two Natures; pronouncing an Anathema against •…•…se who admit two Forms in Jesus Christ, who did not acknowledge, that the Miracles and Sufferings belong'd to one and the same Christ, and did not own that the Word suffer'd, and particularly against Paulus of Samosata, Dioscorus, Theodorus and Theodoret. Baronius and Binius endeavour to make incredible, that this was not Vigilius's; but Li∣beratus is more to be believ'd then they, and Vigilius was certainly capable of doing it.

The second Letter of Vigilius address'd to Eucherius, is that of the first day of March in the Year 538. He answers this Bishop about certain A•…•…es concerning which he had consulted him. 1. He condemns those who under pretence of Ab•…•…ence superstitiously refrain from eating any Meat, think∣ing it forbidden, and evil in it self. 2. He orders the Canons of the H. See to be observ'd, concerning the solemn Administration of Baptism; and reproves those who cut off the Particle, And, in the Gloria Patri, between the Son and the H. Spirit, singing, Gloria Patri & Filio Spiritus Sancto, instead of, & Spiritus Sancto. 3. He says that he had sent to him who writes the Ecclesiastical Canons taken out of the Archives of the Church of Rome, made with respect to those, who having been baptiz'd in the Church, were re-baptiz'd by the Arians when they return'd to the Church. He adds, that nevertheless, their Pe∣nance may be diminish'd, in proportion to their fervor; but that they must not be receiv'd by that Im∣position of Hands, which is us'd to cause the Holy Spirit to descend, but by that which is us'd to re∣concile Penitents. 4. He thinks that a Church must not be Consecrated anew, which is rebuilt upon the same Foundations, but that it is sufficient to celebrate Mess in it. This Consecration was made by throwing Holy Water upon it; for to show that it was not necessary to consecrate it anew, he u∣ses this Expression, Nihil Judicamus officere, si per eam minime aqua benedicta jactetur. 5. He fixes the Day of the Feast of Easter approaching; he says that Divine Service is perform'd after the same manner in all the Feasts, that some Chapters only are added, which agree either to the Mysteries, or to the Saint whose Feast it is: He sends Reliques to him to whom he writes. Here this Letter should end, for he declares that he had answer'd all the Demands of this Bishop, and makes him a Complement wherewith it was usual to conclude a Letter: Yet there are in it two other Articles, which have no relation to the preceding, nor any connexion with the remainder of the Letter. The first condemns the Priests who name not the three Persons in administring Baptism; the second is a∣bout the Primacy of the Church of Rome. It affirms, that there is no doubt but the Roman Church is the Foundation, Form and Principle of all the Churches, because tho all the Apostles were chosen after the same manner, yet St. Peter had the Pre-eminence above the other; which made him be call'd Cephas, because he is the Head and Prince of the other Apostles; that therefore the Church of Rome has the Primacy among all the Churches, and that 'tis necessary, that the Causes which con∣cern the Persons of Bishops, or the important Affairs of the Church, should be communicated to him, and that the Appeals of these Causes should be reserv'd to him. 'Tis very probable that these two Articles are added.

In the third Letter Vigilius makes Answer to Caesarius Bishop of Arles, about King Theodebert's Consulting him concerning the Penance which should be impos'd upon one who had married his Bro∣ther's Wife. Vigilius had already written to the King, that this Crime could not be expiated but by a great Penance: But because 'tis convenient that the Penance should be regulated by the Bishops upon the place, since none but they can know the condition of the Penitent, he commits this care to Caesarius, with whom he leaves full power to regulate the Time and Order of this Penance: But he admonishes him to require, that he commit no more such things for the future, and to hinder him and her, who were thus married, from dwelling together.

The fourth Letter is address'd to Justinian; There he praises the Piety and Faith of this Empe∣ror, who had written to him, that he would inviolably adhere to the Faith establish'd in the four Ge∣neral Councils, and in the Letters of St. Celestin and St. Leo. He testifies to him that he is of the same Judgment, and that he approves what his Predecessors Hormisdas, John and Agapetus had done against the Hereticks, and that he condemns the Persons whom they had condemn'd. He recom∣mends it to this Prince, that he would maintain the Priviledges of the See of Rome, which could not be attack'd without violating, as one may say, the Faith.

In the following Letter he congratulates Mennas for being of the same Judgment: This is dated Sept. 17th, 540.

The sixth, seventh and eighth Letters are address'd to Auxanius Bishop of Arles. In the first he grants him the Pallium: In the second he makes him his Vicar in the Kingdom of Childebert, and annexes two Prerogatives to this Title. The first is to examine and judge the Causes of the Bi∣shops of this Kingdom, provided notwithstanding, that if any Causes of Faith or of difficult Mat∣ters

Page 49

happens they shall be reserv'd to the Decision of the Holy See. The second is, that no Bishop shall go out of his Country, without taking Literae Formatae from him. He exhorts him after∣wards * 1.1 to pray for Justinian, and to preserve the Peace and good Understanding between King Childeber: and the Emperor.

In the third Letter to Auxanius, Vigilius commissions him to Judge the Affair of Pretextatus. The first of these Letters is dated Octob. 18th, 543, and the other two May 22th, 545. The same day he wrote a fourth to the Bishops of the Kingdom of Childebert, and to those who were accu∣stomed to receive their Consecration from the Bishop of Arles, wherein he gives them to under∣stand that he had made Auxanius his Vicar, and sets forth the Rights which he had granted him.

After the death of Auxanius, he gave the same Title and the same Priviledges to his Successor Aurelianus, as appears by the Letters ten and eleven, written in 546.

The other Letters and Treatises of Vigilius having a relation to the History of the fifth Council, of which they make a part, we shall reserve them to be spoken of upon that Head.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.