HOSIUS.
HOSIUS Bishop of Corduba, a City of Spain, did generously confess the Faith of Christ, in the Persecution of the Emperour Dioclesian. The Donatists affirm, That he was condemn'd for his Crimes by the Bishops of Spain, and was afterwards Absolv'd by those of France: But this is a Noto∣rious * 1.1 Calumny, of which they have no Proof, and which is sufficiently confuted by the great Repu∣tation that Hosius had all his Life-time; besides, that his Enemies never charg'd him with any such thing. His Name is found amongst the Names of those Bishops that Subscrib'd to the Canons, which are believ'd to be made in the Council of Elvira. He was known to Constantine, while this Empe∣rour was in the West, and follow'd him into the East; where he was so much esteem'd by him, that he was chosen to be sent into Egypt, to settle the Controversies that were risen there about the Heresie of Arius, and the Celebration of Easter. There he assembled a Council; to which the Egyptians have not scrupled to give the Name of Oecumenical, and us'd his utmost endeavours to reduce Arius to the Communion of his Bishop Alexander, and to establish Peace: But all was in vain, for 'twas necessary to have recourse to a more Powerful Remedy, which was the General Council of Nice. There he was chosen President, either because of his Eminent Vertues, and Rare Qualities; or because he had a perfect Knowledge of the Matter which was to be handled in that Council. He presided also at the Council of Sardica, and maintain'd for a long time with great Constancy the Faith of the Ni∣cene Council, and the Innocence of St. Athanasius, under the Reign of Constantius. This Emperour did in vain sollicite him with Promises and Threatnings, for he answer'd and wrote to him with un∣shaken Firmness; but at last, he was so far overcome by the Miseries which he suffer'd in Banishment, as not only to Communicate with Ursacius and Valens, in the Year. 357; as St. Athanasius con∣fesses, but also to Subscribe to the Second Creed of Sirmium, which is Arian, as St. Hilary and Rheba∣dius, who liv'd at the same time, do clearly Testify. Yet 'tis true, that St. Athanasius who endea∣vours to excuse the Fault of his Friend, as much as he can, says, That he did not Subscribe to his Condemnation, and that his Friend at his Death, protested by his Last Will and Testament, against what he had done, and expresly condemn'd the Heresy of Arius. These two Authors, whom we cited before, do not speak at this Rate of him; but on the contrary, St. Hilary, says, That his Subscription discover'd what he was formerly, i. e. an Hypocrite, who had no other Religion, but that of the Court.