The Treatise of the Glorification of the Trinity, and of the Procession of the Holy Ghost, divi∣ded into Nine Books, contains the Explication of many Passages of Scripture, that have some re∣lation to the Questions, which he proposes concerning the Three Divine Persons, and more espe∣cially that of the Holy Ghost.
As for his Treatise of Divine Offices, it is a Work of another Nature; in which he treats of the Divine Service, and of its Ceremonies, and gives mystical Reasons of them. He there seems to start a particular Notion concerning the Eucharist, viz. That the Bread is made the Body of Jesus Christ, by the Hypostatical Union with his Soul; nevertheless some Authors have vindicated the Assertion, and affirm that it may be explain'd in a good Sense; but we shall not now examine this Question.
The most part of Rupert's Works are dedicated to Cuno Abbot of Siegberg, and afterwards Bishop of Ratisbon, to whom he was recommended by Berenger Abbot of St. Laurence at Liege, in which last Monastery Rupert sometime resided in Quality of a Monk. His Works were printed at Colen A. D. 1578. in Three Volumes, and in Two at Paris in 1638. He himself gives us a Catalogue of them, in the Preface to his Treatise of Divine Offices: He there makes mention of all those that are still extant, and we have every one of them, except his Treatise of the Glorious King Da∣vid, of which he had then only compos'd Eleven Books.
There are Two sorts of Commentaries on the holy Scripture that bear the Name of HUGH OF St. VICTOR; the former are certain Literal and Historical Annotations on the Text, to which is prefix'd a Critical Preface concerning the sacred Writers, and the Books written by them: The others are Allegorical Commentaries intermixed with a great number of Questions and Common Places. These last are call'd A Volume of Extracts, and divided into XXIV Books: The Ten first of these, which are inserted in the Second Tome of the Works of Hugh of St. Victor, contain general Re∣marks on the Arts and Sciences: The Nine following, which are in the first Tome, comprehend variety of Allegories and Questions relating to the Histories of the sacred Books, from the Creation of the World till the time of the Macchabees, that is to say, to all the Historical Books of the Bible: The Tenth, is a Collection of Moral Homilies on Ecclesiastes: In the Four last, are compris'd divers Questions relating to the Four Gospels. To these are annexed, to render the Work compleat, Ex∣plications of the same Nature, but more at large, on all the Epistles of St. Paul.
These XXIV Books of Commentaries are attributed by Trithemius, and several other Authors, to Richard of St. Victor; and the First Part is to be seen under his Name in a certain Manuscript very near his time, which is extant in M. Colbert's Library; some part of it is also printed among the Works of that Author. However, it is affirm'd by some Persons, that this Work cannot belong either to Hugh or to Richard, by reason that in the Chronological Table which the Author makes of the Kings of France, in the Tenth Chapter of the Tenth Book, he ends with Philip the Son of Lewes the Young, before whose Reign these Two Writers were dead. Indeed this Reason may serve to prove, that the said Work was not compos'd by Hugh of St. Victor deceased in 1142. but it is not so evident a proof to shew, that Richard is not the Author of it; because the latter not dying till the Year 1173. and Philip being born in 1165. he might joyn him with King Lewes the Young his Father. How∣ever, this very Passage makes it appear, that the Author of that Work could not have written later than the Reign of Philip Augustus; since he is the last of the Kings of France mention'd by him, and consequently the said Author flourished in the Twelfth Century. As for the Literal Notes, it cannot be doubted, that they were the Genuine Works of Hugh of St. Victor, of which the following are still extant; viz. his Preface concerning the sacred Books, and the inspired Pen-men of them; his Notes on the Pentateuch; on the Book of Judges; on the Books of the Kings; and on some Psalms. These Notes are concise, and do not recede from the Literal and Historical Sense. Those that he made on the Lamentations of Jeremiah, and on the Prophecies of Joel and Obadiah, are larger, and Allegories are intermixed with them. To these Explications of the Books of the holy Scripture are annex'd others, which he wrote on the Book of the Hierarchy at∣tributed to St. Dionysius the Areopagite. We might also add his Explication of the Decalogue, and those of St. Augustin's Rule, which are of the same Style.
The Four Books of the Cloister of the Soul; the Four other Books of the Soul; the small Tract of the Physick of the Soul; the Two Books of Birds; and those of the Spiritual and Carnal Mar∣riages, belong to Hugh de Foliet, a Monk of Corby: I also ascribe to the same Monk, the Dialogue between the Flesh and the Spirit, the Style of which is different from that of Hugh of St. Victor; nay, perhaps he is the Author of the Four Books of the Mystical Ark, and of the Ark of Noah, which bear the Name of the Benedictin Monk of Saxony: Insomuch that in the Second Tome of the Works of Hugh of St. Victor, there are but very few of his Genuine Pieces; viz. the Soliloquy of the Soul; the Encomium of Charity; the Discourse on the manner of Praying; the Discourse of the Love of the Bridegroom, and of the Spouse; the Four Books of the Vanity of the World, and the 100 Sermons.
The last Tome contains Dogmatical Works; the First of which is called Didascalick, or In∣structive Institutions, being divided into Seven Books, in which are certain Rules for studying, and general Notions of the Sciences. In the Fourth, he treats of the sacred Books, of the Writings of the Fathers, and of the Councils and Canons: In the Fifth, of the Sense of the holy Scriptures: In the Sixth, of the manner of reading it; and in last, which is the largest, of the manner of attaining to the Knowledge of God, and of the Trinity, by the Creatures.
The Second, relates to the Will and Omnipotence of God; in which he examines this Question; viz. Whether his Power be of a larger extent than his Will?