A new history of ecclesiastical writers containing an account of the authors of the several books of the Old and New Testament, of the lives and writings of the primitive fathers, an abridgement and catalogue of their works ... also a compendious history of the councils, with chronological tables of the whole / written in French by Lewis Ellies du Pin.

About this Item

Title
A new history of ecclesiastical writers containing an account of the authors of the several books of the Old and New Testament, of the lives and writings of the primitive fathers, an abridgement and catalogue of their works ... also a compendious history of the councils, with chronological tables of the whole / written in French by Lewis Ellies du Pin.
Author
Du Pin, Louis Ellies, 1657-1719.
Publication
London :: Printed for Abel Swalle and Tim. Thilbe ...,
MDCXCIII [1693]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Church history.
Fathers of the church -- Bio-bibliography.
Christian literature, Early -- Bio-bibliography.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A69887.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A new history of ecclesiastical writers containing an account of the authors of the several books of the Old and New Testament, of the lives and writings of the primitive fathers, an abridgement and catalogue of their works ... also a compendious history of the councils, with chronological tables of the whole / written in French by Lewis Ellies du Pin." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A69887.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 18, 2024.

Pages

Of the other Bishops of FRANCE.

THE other Bishops of France shew'd themselves no less zealous for the keeping up of Discipline and maintaining their Rights, than those we have already mention'd. We have one famous * 1.1 instance of it related by Glaber Monk of Cluny, who liv'd in the following Century. Fulcus Count of Anjou, upon his return from a Journey he made to Jerusalem, being willing to discharge himself of a Vow he had made, caus'd a Monastery to be built in the Territory of Tours, over gainst the Castle of Loches, which he dedicated according to the Advice of his Wife to the memory of the Cheru∣bims and Seraphims, and not to the memory of any Martyr. Hugh Archbishop of Tours was intrea∣ted to perform the Dedication of that Monastery; but he refus'd it till such time as Fulcus should re∣store to his Church the Revenues which he had contrary to all justice taken from it. Fulcus stomach'd this refusal, went to Rome, and after he had made several Presents to Pope John, he return'd with Cardinal Peter, who afterwards dedicated the Monastery, having a Commission granted by the Pope

Page 48

for that purpose. As soon as the Bishops of France •…•…, They k••••w (says Glaber) that it was the effect of 〈…〉〈…〉 which having inclin'd 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈…〉〈…〉 Church, had likewise 〈◊〉〈◊〉 upon the Pope to accept of thse Presents which 〈◊〉〈◊〉 had 〈◊〉〈◊〉 him of the 〈◊〉〈◊〉 which he had un∣lawfully seiz'd upon; and that by this means 〈…〉〈…〉 ris to 〈◊〉〈◊〉 fresh 〈◊〉〈◊〉 in the Church of Rome. They all abominted this procedings looking upon 〈…〉〈…〉 Action▪ tha he who govern'd 〈◊〉〈◊〉 Holy Apostolical See should violate the first Order establish'd by the Apostles and by the Canons, the Custom of the Church, founded on a great many Authorities of Antiquity▪ which forbids Bishops to exercise any Juris diction in anothers Diocess, unlss the Bishop of that Diocess intreat him, or permit him to do it. For tho' the Pope of Rome be most rever'd upon the account of the Dignity of the Holy Apostolick See, yet he is not permitted in any case whatsoever to violate the Rules prescrib'd by the Canons. And 〈◊〉〈◊〉 each Bishop of the Catholick Church is the H••••band of his own Church, and the Representative of our Lord: So it is not allowable to any man to undertake any thing in •…•…rs Diocess. Glaber adds, that Fulcus notwith∣standing these Remonstrances, having caus'd this Church to be dedicated, had no Bishops present but those of his own Dominions, who assisted at it much against their wills; and that it was no sooner finish'd, but the Fabrick was blown down by a 〈◊〉〈◊〉, which is attributed to the 〈◊〉〈◊〉 of this proceeding.

In the year 989▪ a Council was held in the Abbey of S. Saviour of Charr••••x, in the Diocess of Poi∣tiers, * 1.2 at which assisted the Archbishop of B••••deaux, and the Bishops of Poitiers, L•…•…ges, Perigueux, Saintes, and 〈◊〉〈◊〉. There was nothing else done there but 〈◊〉〈◊〉 out 〈◊〉〈◊〉 against those who should rob the Churches of their Revenues, de•…•… the Poor of their D•…•…, o should by force apprehend or abuse a Clerk, not bearing Arms, before he were try'd by his Bishop.

Ten years after there was another Council held in the City of Poitiers, which 〈…〉〈…〉 called by Wil∣liam * 1.3 Count of Poitiers, and consisted of the Archbishop of Bordeaux, and the Bishops of Poitiers, Li∣mges, Ang•…•…, and Saintes. They therein confirm'd the Order made in the Council of Chrrux against the Usurpators of the Revenue of Churches and of private Persons. And for the putting is in execution▪ it was order'd that all the Grandees and Judges should cause full Restitution to be made to every one, who had any thin taken from them▪ and that those who wo••••d not submit to their Determinations, should be 〈◊〉〈◊〉 to do it by force. They therein likewise forbid Bishops the exacting any thing for the Administration of 〈◊〉〈◊〉 and Confirmation▪ and renew'd the Prohibition made so often against Ecclesiasticks keeping Company with Women.

We shall reckon among the Councils of France the Synod held at Ravenna under Gerbert▪ ecause we look upon that Archbishop a a 〈◊〉〈◊〉; and because it was e 〈◊〉〈◊〉 who •…•…e the following Institution in an Assembly of his Clergy, held the first of May in the year 997.

The first is a Prohibition of a great Abuse which prevail'd in the Church of 〈◊〉〈◊〉, according to * 1.4 which they 〈◊〉〈◊〉 to Bishops, at the time of their Consecration, the Body of JESUS CHRIST, and the Holy Chrism to the Arch-Priests of the Diocess. The Eucharist which he speaks of in this place, was 〈◊〉〈◊〉 Consecrated Loaf, which was given whole to the Bishop on the Day of his Consecrati∣on, and which he kept by him to Communicate thereof for forty days together, as 〈◊〉〈◊〉 observ'd in the Roman Decretal.

The second imports, that all the Arch-Priests shall pay to the Sub-Deacons of Ravenna, as an ac∣knowledgment of that Church, an yearly Pension of Two pence.

The third renews the Ancient Canons concerning the necessary qualifications of those who are to be admitted into Holy Orders, and prohibits Bishops from Consecrating Churches out of their own Dio∣cess, without leave from the Bishop of the place; and from entertaining or keeping those who be∣long to anothers Diocess▪ till they have Letters Dimissory from their Bishop. He likewise forbids the receiving any thing for the Burial of the Dead, unless their Friends or R•…•…ons ••••ould give any thing voluntarily.

Lastly we shall refer to this place that which happen'd in France and at Rome about the Marriage and Divorce of King Robert and Queen Bertha.

About the end of this Century, that Prince being a Widdower by the Death of Queen Lutgard * 1.5 his first Wife, had marry'd Bertha, Sister to Radulphus the Simple, King of Burgundy, who was the Widow of Eudes the first, Count of Chartres. But forasmuch as she was his Kinswoman, and he had formerly stood Godfather to one of her Children, tho' he had taken the Advice of several Bishops of his Kingdom about it, yet the Pope oppos'd this Marriage as being Null, and contracted between Persons, who according to Law could not marry together. Robert did what he could to confirm this Marriage, and spoke about it to Leo Pope Gregory the Fifth's Legat in France, who made him believe that he would obtain of the Pope what he desir'd, provided he would cause Arnulphus to be re-establish'd in the Archbishoprick of Rheims. In the mean time notwithstanding the Judgment which was pass'd i•…•… favour of that Archbishop, Pope Gregory V. held 〈◊〉〈◊〉 Council at Rome in the year 998. in * 1.6 the presen•…•… of the Emperor Otho III. at which assisted Gerbert, at that time Archbishop of Ravenna, and seven and twenty Bishops of Italy. In this Council he declar'd that King Robert ought to part from his Kinswoman Bertha, whom he had marry'd contr••••y to the Laws, and do Pennance for seven years together, according to the Degrees set down by the Canons; and if he would not, he should be Auathematiz'd: That Bertha should submit to the same Penalty; and he Excommunicated Arch•…•…bold Archbishop of T•…•…rs, who had celebrated that Marriage, and the Bishops of France, who had either Assisted or Consented thereto, till such time as they should come and give the Holy-See sa∣tisfaction. This Sentence of the Pope made such an Impression on the minds of Men (if we will be∣lieve

Page 49

Peter Damien in the case) that all the King's Domesticks, except two or three, abandon'd him, and would no longer have any Conversation with him; and even caus'd the Vessels out of which he had either eat or drunk to be burnt. Let the Case be how it will, King Robert at last giving ear to the Admonitions of Abbo the Abbot, parted with Bertha within two or three years after; and Leo IX. (according as Ives of Chartres relates it) says that they came to Rome with the Bishops, to obtain their Absolution, and to get their Pennance mitigated. The Author of the Life of Abbo does not say that Robert went to Rome; but that he confessed his Fault both publickly and privately: that he asked pardon, and did Pennance for it. That which is most evident is, that the Marriage was of no longer force.

In the same Council, the Pope passed several other Sentences. The first in favour of the Church of Mersburgh, which had been rais'd to a Bishoprick by the holy See, and by the Councils held un∣der Otho, and afterwards destroy'd out of Council by Otho II. He restores to it its Dignity of being an Episcopal See.

The second relates to the Person of the Bishop of Mersburgh, call'd Gislair, who had quitted that Church to be Archbishop of Magdeburgh. It was order'd, that if he had been requir'd by the Clergy and Laity of Magdeburgh to take upon him that Archbishoprick, be should still hold it: That if that had not been done, and he could prove that neither Ambition nor Avarice moved him to take upon him that Archbishoprick, he should return to his first Church without being depos'd. But if he could not deny but that he was induced to it by some one or other of these Motives, he should be de∣priv'd of both Churches. This Gislair did not submit to the Sentence of Gregory, but held both these Churches. Whereupon he was accus'd in a Council at Rome, held under Sylvester II. Successor to Gregory V. who suspended him for some time, and ordered his Nuncio's in Germany to cite him. But that Bishop prevail'd upon them by Bribery to put it off, and afterwards pleaded for his Excuse his being sick of the Palsy. At last he appear'd before a Council held at Aix-la-Chapelle, where he demanded an Appeal to a General Council. Lastly, The Emperor Henry having sent for him to Dronburgh, and remonstrated to him that he ought to return to his Church of Mersburgh, he desired a few days to consider on it, and dy'd in the Interim.

The third relates to the Church of Puy in Velay. Guy Bishop of that City, had elected for his Suc∣cessor his Nephew Stephen, without the Consent of Clergy and Laity: however, after the Death of Guy, the Archbishop of Bourges and the Bishop of Nevers had ordain'd Stephen. The Council de∣clares this Ordination to be null and void; deposes Stephen; excommunicates the Prelates who had ordain'd him, till such time as they should come and give the Holy See satisfaction; grants leave to the Clergy and Laity of Velay to elect a Bishop; desires the Pope might consecrate him whom they should elect; and exhorts King Robert not to support Steven, but to stand by him who should be elec∣ted by the Clergy and Laity. This Sentence was put in Execution; Theodarde was elected by the Clergy and Laity, and ordain'd by Silvester II. Successor to Gregory V. as we learn by the Fragment of a Letter of that Pope, related by Father Dachery in the Advertisement to the Reader before the Ninth Tome of his Spicilegium, wherein he has given us the Acts of that Council more compleat than they are in the Edition of the Councils by Father Labbé. He takes notice in the same place that Gregory V. held a Council at Rome, wherein Gualdalde, who had seiz'd upon the Episcopal see of the Church of Osona or Vich, in the Province of Catalonia, had been depos'd, as appears by a Letter of Gregory V. which Father Dachery tells us is in the hands of Monsieur Baluzius. 'Tis very probable that this was done in the same Council, where Otho III. publish'd an Edict, directed to the Arch-bishops, Abbots, Marquisses, Counts; and to all the Judges of Italy; whereby he declares that all the Deeds of Alienation of the Church Revenues, even tho' leas'd out for 99 years, shall not be of force any longer than the life time of him who shall make them; and that there shall be no such Deeds made but for the Advantage of those Churches who are to be maintain'd out of them. This Edict is dated October 17. in the year 998. and 'tis observ'd that it was publish'd by Gerbert in the Synod which turn'd Arnulphus out of the Archbishoprick of Milan.

In this Century there was no less care taken of settling the Monastical Discipline of France, than of the Ecclesiastical Discipline; and as the Bishops were diligent in reforming the Clergy and Laity; so there were some holy Abbots, who set themselves, and that with a great deal more success, upon reforming the Monastical Order, which was the beginning of that Century in a very lamentable Condition. Most of the Monasteries having been ruin'd by the Normans, were abandon'd, their Re∣venues were in possession of Laicks, and the Abbots were Seculars. If there were any Monks still left in the Monasteries, they were such as observ'd no order; and were so far from living according to their Rule, that they did not so much as know it.

In this Condition was the Monasterial Order, when God rais'd up Berno, Monk of Antun, to be the * 1.7 Restorer of it. He began his Reformation in the Monasteries of Joigny and Baume, and in several others of which he was Abbot. For a Custom was then in Use, that one and the same Abbot held se∣veral Abbeys, or at least several Monasteries which depended upon him. He had for his Compani∣ons and Disciples Odo and Adegrin. In the year 910. William Count of Auvergne and Duke of A∣quitain; having founded the Abbey of Cluny, committed it to the Government of Berno, who put twelve Monks into it, and took likewise care of the Monasteries of Hols, Massay, and Souvigny, who were all under his Conduct, and embrac'd the same way of Living. Berno dying in the year 927. had for his Successor Odo, the Son of Abbo, born at Tours in the year 879. He had been e∣ducated by Fulcus Count of Anjou, and made Canon of S. Martin of Tours at nineteen years of Age.

Page 50

Some time after, being come to Paris, he became a Disciple of Remy of Auxerre; and afterwards resolved to dedicate himself to God, he embrac'd the Monastical Life in the year 909. in the Mo∣nastery of Baume, under the Conduct of Berno. Odo extended the Reformation of Cluny to a great many other Monasteries, and carried it as far as Rome it self, to which he made three Journeys. The first in the year 936. The second in the year 938. and the last in the year 942. being call'd thither by the Popes to be the Mediator of the Peace between the Princes of Italy. He dy'd at Tours in the year 942. at his return from his last Journey to Rome.

He had for his Successor Ademar, or Aymar; next him was S. Macol, who was employ'd by Hugh Capet in the Reformation of almost all the Monasteries of France. He dy'd in the year 994. leaving for his Successor Odilo, who had been elected three years before his death. This last was Abbot of Cluny for the space of Fifty six years.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.