Experimental notes of the mechanical origine or production of fixtness.
About this Item
Title
Experimental notes of the mechanical origine or production of fixtness.
Author
Boyle, Robert, 1627-1691.
Publication
London :: Printed by E. Flesher, for R. Davis Bookseller in Oxford.,
1675.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Solids -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A69611.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Experimental notes of the mechanical origine or production of fixtness." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A69611.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 7, 2025.
Pages
CHAP. I. (Book 1)
FIXITY being the opposite Qua∣lity
to Volatility, what we have
discoursed about the latter, will make
the nature of the former more easily
understood, and upon that account
allow me to make somewhat the
quicker dispatch of what I have to
say of it.
descriptionPage 4
The Qualifications that conduce
most to the Fixity of a portion of mat∣ter,
seem to be these.
First, the grossness or the bulk of
the corpuscles it consists of. For if
these be too big, they will be too
unwieldly and unapt to be carried up
into the Air by the action of such mi∣nute
particles as those of the Fire,
and will also be unfit to be buoyed
up by the weight of the Air; as we
see, that Vapours, whilst they are such,
are small enough to swim in the Air,
but can no longer be sustained by it,
when they convene into drops of rain
or flakes of snow. But here it is to
be observed, that when I speak of the
corpuscles that a fixt body consists of,
I mean not either its Elementary or
its Hypostatical Principles, as such,
but onely those very little masses or
clusters of particles, of what kind so∣ever
they be, that stick so firmly to
one another, as not to be divisible
and dissipable by that degree of fire
in which the body is said to be fixt;
so that each of those little Concreti∣ons,
descriptionPage 5
though it may it self be made up
of two, three, or more particles of a
simpler nature, is considered here per
modum Ʋnius, or as one intire cor∣puscle.
And this is one Qualification
conducive to the Fixtness of a bo∣dy.
The next is the ponderousness or
solidity of the corpuscles it is made up
of. For if these be very solid, and
(which solid and compact bodies
usually are) of a considerable speci∣fick
gravity, they will be too heavy
to be carried up by the effluvia or
the action of the fire, and their pon∣derousness
will make them as unwiel∣dy,
and indisposed to be elevated by
such Agents, as the grossness of their
bulk would make bigger corpuscles,
but of a proportionably inferiour
specifick weight. On which account
the calces of some metals and mine∣rals,
as Gold, Silver, &c. though, by
the operation of Solvents, or of the
fire, or of both, reduced to powders
exceedingly subtile, will resist such
vehement fires, as will easily drive
descriptionPage 6
up bigger, but less heavy and com∣pact,
corpuscles, than those calces
consist of.
The third Qualification that con∣duces
to the Fixity of a body, be∣longs
to its Integral parts, not barely
as they are several parts of it, but as
they are aggregated or contexed in∣to
one body. For, the Qualification,
I mean, is the ineptitude of the com∣ponent
corpuscles for avolation, by
reason of their branchedness, irre∣gular
figures, crookedness, or other
inconvenient shape, which intangles
the particles among one another, and
makes them difficult to be extricated;
by which means, if one of them do
ascend, others, wherewith 'tis com∣plicated,
must ascend with it; and,
whatever be the account on which
divers particles stick firmly together,
the aggregate will be too heavy or
unwieldy to be raised. Which I
therefore take notice of, because
that, though usually 'tis on the rough∣ness
and irregularity of corpuscles,
that their cohesion depends; yet it
descriptionPage 7
sometimes happens, that the smooth∣ness
and flatness of their surfaces
makes them so stick together, as to
resist a total divulsion; as may be
illustrated by what I have said of the
cohesion of polished marbles and the
plates of glass, and by the fixity of
glass it self in the fire.
From this account of the Causes or
Requisites of Fixity, may be dedu∣ced
the following means of giving or
adding Fixation to a body, that was
before either Volatile, or less fixt.
These means may be reduced to two
general Heads; First, the action of
the Fire, as the parts of the body,
exposed to it, are thereby made to
operate variously on one another.
And next, the association of the par∣ticles
of a volatile body with those
of some proper additament: Which
term, [of proper] I rather imploy than
that, one would expect, [of fixt;]
because 'twill ere long appear, that,
in certain cases, some volatile bodies
may more conduce to the fixation of
other volatile bodies, than some fixt
descriptionPage 8
Ones doe. But these two Instruments
of Fixation being but general, I shall
propose four or five more particular
ones.
email
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem?
Please contact us.