CONFERENCE CXLI. Whether it be better to marry, or not to marry. (Book 141)
IF Nature made the Crystalline humor of the Eye without co∣lour, the Tongue without savour, the Ear without sound, to the end they might impartially judge of all Objects offer'd to those Senses; I know not to whose judgement we must referr the Decision of this Question: Virgins, marry'd people, and those that are not marry'd, being equally interessed, and con∣sequently, lyable to exception. The first, professing Hatred of Marriage; The second, unwilling to blame it, for fear of af∣fronting their pass'd Judgement; And the Third, being unfit to judge thereof for want of Experience. If we will credit Cato, who had try'd it, and who being one day sollicited by his Friends to second Nuptials, told them, He had once been deliver'd from Shipwrack, and therefore car'd not for venturing to Sea again; those that never embarque in Marriage will gain the Cause, it being the highest point of Humane Prudence to be wise at the expense of others, whose example makes them justly fear the in∣convenienes of a Contract, so disadvantageous to the freedom of Man, as that of Marriage is, wherein there is this peculiarity, that in all other Contracts, ever one party is a gainer; but here both are oftentimes cheated, almost alwayes discontented with the bargain, and willing to retract, if they had liberty, which hath been retrencht eversince the Law of Divorce was abroga∣ted by that of Grace, for the greater mortifying of Men, and teaching them to suffer and sigh, in satisfaction for their sins, under the heavy yoke of Marriage. Besides that, the Friend∣ship so much boasted therein, is so rare, as to be almost impos∣ble; partly, because the Will is never carry'd to love an Object but by its full Liberty, and loves less upon never so little con∣straint; and partly, because Converse shews the Marry'd Couple