REPLY.
WE have shown your interpretation of the clause of forbearance, not to be right, and have refuted it, we think, by the very words of your Covenant; so that none
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
WE have shown your interpretation of the clause of forbearance, not to be right, and have refuted it, we think, by the very words of your Covenant; so that none
of these three scandals can be eschewed by us, if we sub∣scribe to your foresaid Covenant. 2. Suppose the other two might be eschewed by that interpretation of the clause of forbearance, yet the third cannot be eschewed, seeing at our admission we have sworn obedience to the articles of Pearth, and to our Ordinarie: Wherefore, ye must either prove the Articles of Pearth, and Episcopacie, to be unlaw∣full, or else, we cannot, without violation of our oath, made at our admission, forbear the practise of the foresaid Articles, against the will of our Ordinary, and other our lawfull Superiours.