that sort agaynst him by casting for the proude and pre∣sumptuous woordes. VVhat is to be doone then? If wee haue once settled that thing in our hartes which the holy Scripture teacheth vs: the same will hold vs in true sted∣fastnesse. And afterward when wee speake after the mea∣sure of our fayth, wee shall not onely caste foorth goodly blastes, but God shall be exalted and magnified in all our talke. But now lette vs come to that which is set downe heere for the principall. VVill God peruert Iudgement and right? will the Almightie ouerthrowe Iustice? Here wee bee [ 10] put in mind to yeeld God the honor of beeing the foun∣taine of all equitie and right, and that it is impossible that hee shoulde do any thing that is not good and rightfull. Some can well finde in their hartes to graunt that God is Almighty, but in the meane while they acknowledge him not to bee rightuous as they ought to do. For the one of them must not be separated from the other. VVe muste not imagine that there are things in God whiche can bee deuided one from another. True it is that it behooueth vs too put a difference betweene the wisedome, and the [ 20] goodnesse, and the Iustice, and the almightinesse of God: but yet notwithstanding, in respect that hee is God, all these things must needs be in him at once, and they must be as it were himselfe or his very beeing. Then let vs be∣ware that were surmyze not a lawelesse power in God, as if he gouerned the world like a Tyrant, and vsed excesse or crueltie. But lette vs vnderstande whereas he hath all things in his hande, and is of endlesse power and doth all things, yet notwithstanding hee ceasseth not to bee righ∣tuous. It is true that this rightuousnesse of God is part∣ly [ 30] hidde from vs, so as wee comprehende it not: but yet neuerthelesse, it is of his mightinesse also: and for proofe thereof, are we able to measure it by our with and vnder∣standing? It is certayne that wee cannot. And therefore when we heare speaking of Gods rightuousnesse and Iu∣stice: let vs marke, that although the same bee not fully knowne and manifest vnto vs: yet wee must honor and reuerence it. It is sayde that his deuices are a bottomlesse pit, and that he dwelleth in vnapprochable light, so as we cannot reache so high as to know what is in him. But yet [ 40] neuerthelesse, we must be fully perswaded in our selues, that it is the propertie and nature of God to do all things in perfect vprightnesse so as there is no faulte too bee founde. Nowe then wee see what opinion wee ought too conceyue of God. VVhen worldly folke speake of God, they can well say that hee is the soueraine Creator of the worlde: but yet in the meane season they acknowledge not the thing that is propre vnto him, nor him in suche wise as it is his will to manifest himself vnto vs that is to wit in his Iustice, in his goodnesse, in his wisedome, and in [ 50] all things whereby we may take taste to loue him, to ho∣nor him, and too serue him. And this is the principall poynt that wee must take heede vnto. For what shall we haue gayned by knowing curiously what the Beeing and what the glorious Maiestie of God is: if in the meane tyme wee vnderstande not that thing of him whiche wee ought to feele by experience, and which he declareth vn∣to vs? as when it is sayde that he dwelleth in vs, and that we liue in him & haue our mouing & beeing in him, that his mercie filleth all things, that wee be susteyned by his [ 60] goodnesse, that we haue so much light as he giueth vs and no more, that it is in him to remedie all our corruptions, & that we cānot haue so much as one graine or one drop of rightuousnesse, except wee drawe it out of him who is the welspring therof. Now if we know not these things, what shall it auayle vs to know that there is but only one God, who contayneth all things, & to haue some feeling of his maiesty? VVherefore so much the more behoueth it vs to marke well what is sayd here: that is to wit, that we muste take it for a grounded principle, that Gods na∣ture is rightuous, & that it is no more possible for him to turne aside from right & equitie, than to say that hee can forgo his being, & ceasse to be God. For it is no lesse ab∣surditie to say, that God doth any thing vnaduisedly, than to say that hee is not at all, or to say that his Beeing is di∣minished. And here yee see also how S. Paule reasoneth in the thirde to the Romanes, where hee taketh awaye the slaunder that might be inforced against the doctrine that he brought: how mē are alwaies full of venim to speake euill of Gods pure truth, and to stand checking & reply∣ing against it. Sainct Paule therfore sayeth, Is God vnrigh∣tuous? How should it be possible, that he to whom it belō∣geth to iudge the whole worlde, should not performe all right? He sheweth there by this word Iudge, how all of vs ought too bee fully perswaded, that God is so chare of right dealing, that all that he doeth and all that commeth from him is cōpassed about with that rule. VVee see then that the sayde sentence of S. Paules agreeth with this of Baldads. For vnder this terme God, Baldad cōprehendeth Iustice and rightdealing, and so doth he afterwarde vnder the woorde Almightie. And it is as muche as if hee had sayd, Can we spoyle God of that thing whiche is so knitte into his beeing, as they cannot by any meanes be put a∣sunder. It were as much as to abace him vtterly, and too pull him out of his seare, and to bring him to nothing, if a man woulde pleade agaynst him as though hee were not rightuous. In steade of setting downe the woorde God alone, or of ioyning the title of Almightie too it: Sainct Paule alledgeth the office of him: that is to wit, that God is the iudge of the world. And hee is not a Iudge after the maner of those that are brybed and corrupted, as wee see mortall mē are, who being well aduaūced to great estate and authoritie, doo notwithstanding abuse the same full oft: But it is not so with God. And why? For, his be∣ing Iudge of the worlde, is not by good happe, or by ele∣ction at auenture, or by sute, or by purchace: but it is inci∣dēt to him by nature, he is no sooner God, but he is im∣mediatly iudge therwithal. Seing thē that the cace stādeth so, let vs not cōceyue ought of him but all rightuousnesse being well assured that his will is the soueraine rule ther∣of. Furthermore (as I haue sayde) this rightuousnesse cannot be so knowen vnto vs as we should be able to de∣cypher what is in it, that when soeuer God shall woorke ought, wee shall see the reason why. And doubtlesse it is no reason that it shoulde bee subiect to vs, or that wee shoulde desire too haue it an vnderling too our capacitie. Then if wee finde not that thing to bee good whiche hee doeth, whither shall wee go? what a presumptuousnesse shall it be for mortall creatures, (I say) for poore worms of the earth, to be desirous to compell God to make thē to knowe what his workes are, and to giue their verdit of them? But cleane contrarie, although God conceale the