therby only becū heyres, thā is y• preachyng of Christes faith, but a vayne thing, than is gods promise of none effecte, synce it is certayne, y• through the benefite of the lawe, noman receyueth y• blessyng which god promysed to Abrahā. Yea I saye so vnable is Moses law to bryng men to this ioy∣full & welthy state, y• it rather worketh wrath & goddes displeasure, whiles therby occasion is ministred more greuously to offend hym, wheras faith contrarywyse of y• wycked & vngodly maketh men righteous. For where offences are and displeasures are borne, as it is with them, which are vn∣der the lawe, there is there for chyldren no inheritaunce dew. But nowe & yf any man aske how the lawe rather worketh gods displeasure & wrathe than righteousnes, beholde, this wyse it is. Experience sheweth, that it is vnlawfull to condemne another man as gyltye, vnles by some law fyrste made there be a penaltie of condēnacion proclamed and appoynted. But so was it that in Moses lawe were there diuerse thynges commaunded to be done or not done, as for example circumcision, the Sabboth daye ke∣pyng, feastes of the newe Moone, the differences of meates, touchyng of deade bodyes, of strangled beastes, of bloude, of washynges, al which are of this sorte that though we neuer so diligentlye obserue them, yet make they vs not righteouse, and yet is suche one as dothe in these offende, en∣daungered and subiecte to punyshment. But now because by this law no man is bounde, but suche as are Iewes, and forasmuche as to Abraham was promysed the enheritaunce of all nacions, well foloweth it, that by the ryght and kepyng of the carnal law, the promise of god can not be de∣riued into all nations, and then foloweth it that by fayth is this inheri∣taunce obteined, and goddes pleasure is it should so be, to thentent that men should knowe, that it is a gyfte gyuen by goddes free mercy and fa∣uour, and of no debte. And thus shall goddes faythful promyse, wherby all Abrahams posteritie is put in hope of this glorious state, be certayne and effectuall. I call Abrahams posteritie, not only suche, as by reason of one common lawe giuen vnto them are of one stocke, but rather all suche, as in fayth resemble theyr fyrst parentes. For more agreable vnto reason is it, y• spirituall kynrēd knytte together thorow fayth, wherby Abraham deseruyng the promyse became goddes frende, should be a thyng muche more effectuall, then is any carnal kynred thorowe the lawe, who prouo∣keth both goddes displeasure and also condemneth vs. A vayne crake is it therfore to saye as the Iewes do, that Abraham is onelye theyr father, when he is in very dede father to vs all, of what nation soeuer we be, so y• we humbly receyue and embrace Christes gospell. That this is true, god himselfe in the .xvii. Chapiter of Genesis witnesseth, what time he encrea∣sed his name, and in stede of Abram callyng hym Abraham, sayed: I haue made the father of many naciōs. Certaine must that be, which god spake. But then yf Abraham be father to the circumcised people and no mo, how standeth it wt this, y• he is father of many nacions? Be in this perswaded rather, y• as there are no more gods but one of al suche as trust vpon him: so gods wyl & pleasure was, y• Abrahā whiche was a figure of god, euen as Isaac fygured Christ, should be the father, not of this nation, or that only, but of all them whiche were by lyke fayth ioyned vnto hym.
Nor coulde Abraham in his belief be deceyued, because he had a confi∣dence