〈◊〉〈◊〉 Mexico, Brasil, Malaca, &c. So likewise Ophir and Tharsis; and as for Tharsis, it signifieth ei∣••••er the maine Sea, or most remote and strange Regions. Thus he coniectureth.
For Ophir we haue before found it, the proper name of a man and of a Region denominated of him; but withal haue acknowledged the Ophirian voyage to comprehend more then the Region of Ophir, including the other Indian Ports wherat they touched and traded in that voyage, especially the two Ilands now called Seilan and Sumatra, and all places on the Coast within the Gulfe of Bengala, which might fit their purpose. It is vsuall now to call an Indian Voyage, not only to Iacatra, Bantam, or Banda, but thereto also they reckon their touching at Soldanha, on the maine of Afrike, or at the Riuer of Saint Augu••tine in the great Iland of Saint Laurence, and the Ilands of Comoro, or Socatra, or wheresoeuer they arriue on the Abash or Mohan shoare in the Red Sea, [ 10] or in any Arabike Port, or in the Persian Gulfe before they come to India: and there also Surat, Diul, Calicut, or wheresoeuer they touch besides on this side or beyond that principal Port where they make their Voyage, as they terme it, that is, where they take in their chiefe ladings. Of which, the following Relations will giue you many instances. So the Straits Voyages, intimate not the meere sayling to or thorow the Straits of Gibraltar, in vulgar appellation, but all Voy∣ages within those Straits whether to Venice, or Ligorne, or Zant, or Constanstinople, or Scanderone, or Alexandria, or in one Voyage to visit many or all of these Ports, is yet called but a Straits Voy∣age. We may yeeld thus much therefore to Acosta, that Ophir, was a proper Countrey (as India also is) extending from Ganges to Menan, and betwixt the Lake Chiamay, and the Gulfe or Sea [ 20] of Bengala; but as it happened, that India being the remotest knowne Region, gaue name in old times to all later Discoueries beyond it, and in after times accidentally to the New World, which the first finders mistooke for Easterne India, so also the Voyage to Ophir, accidentally might giue name to all those Remote parts, and comprehend all the farre Ports, which by occasion of the Voyage to Ophir they visited, lying in the way thither, or somewhat wide or beyond. And as there is a Region truly and properly called India, euen al that which extends from Indus (whence it is so named) to Ganges; which name by others ignorance of the proper names of Regions; was extended further both beyond Ganges, and to all remote Regions, so was there a true Ophir, na∣med of Ophir the sonne of Ioktan, which occasioned other remote Countreyes to beare that ap∣pellation, at least in this Voyage thither.
[ 30] But for Tharsis or Tarshish, or Tharshish; we see Acosta himselfe in his finall vpshot, to make an aut of it, Aut immensum mare, aut regiones semotissimas & valde peregrinas accipi solere. So that his former Proposition admits now another, that either it is the maine Ocean (which I take to be the true sense) or some remote Region. Some are of opinion that the Voyage to Ophir, and that to Tharsis differed, because the Scripture saith, according to our Translation, For the King had at Sea a Nauie of Tharshish, with the Nauie of Hiram once in three yeeres, came the Nauie of Tharshish, bringing Gold and Siluer, Iuorie, and Apes and Peacockes.
Tremellius hath it. Nam classis Oceani pro rege cum classe Chirami erat: semel ternis annis veniebat classis ex Oceano afferens aurum, &c. The Vulgar, Latine and Septuagint, Nauis Tharsis erat regi Salomoni in mari cum nauibus Chiram.
[ 40] Saint Ierome in many places examineth this Tharshish, as in Es. 2. Melius est Tharsis vel mare vel pelagus absolutè ponere, and alledgeth Ionas his fleeing to Tharsis, who from Ioppe could not come to India by Sea,
Most of the late Writers agree with Tremellius, that Tharsis is the Ocean; and make that a difference betwixt Tharshish and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Iam which signifies the Sea, as the Red Sea, or Mediter∣ranean, and withall those lesse collections of waters as the Dead Sea, the Sea of Galilee, and that Brazen Vessell for the largenesse, called a Sea, 2. King. 25.16. whereas Tharshish is only the Maine or large Sea. R. Mose Hadarsan citeth foure significations, Tarsus a Citie of Cilicia, Carthage, India, and the Sea. This place cannot admit Tarsus nor Carthage, beeing in another Sea, to which Esiongeber, on the Red Sea had not beene the Port to haue sailed from, but Ioppe or Tyrus, or some other Hauen in the Mediterranean. Now if any thinke them two Voyages from two [ 50] seuerall Ports, the Scr••pture is plaine, where it is said, Iehoshaphat made ships of Tharshish to goe to Ophir for Gold; but they went not, for the ships were broken at Esiongeber. And lest any might thinke that they were call••d ships of Tharshish, because the materials came from Cilicia, it is more full, 2. Chron. 20.••5. And after this did Iehoshaphat King of Iudah, ioyne himselfe with Ahaziah King of Israel, who did very wickedly. And he ioyned himselfe with him to make ships to go to Tarshish, and they made the ships in Esiongeber. Then Eliezer prophesied, &c. and the ships were broken that they could not goe to Tarshish. Note also that the vulgar translateth in one place Sea, in the other Tharsis.
Some hence gather it to be a Region in India, as that Rabbi, and Ierome also doth in some sort [ 60] auerre, with Iosephus, and many late Writers. But because no such Region in India can be found, hence so many opinions. Postel••us placeth Ophir in the Golden Region where Malaca standeth, but makes Tharsis to extend further, euen to the South Sea; or the Peruan Coast, so that Ophir and Peru are diuorced for a marriage with Tharsis. The Chaldee will haue it Africa, and Ema∣nuel Saa in Angola; Acosta no certaine place; Ribera will haue them two Voyages, and not the