*The fift examination of Richard Woodman, had before the Bishop of Winchester, the Archdeacon of Cant. Doct. Langdale, with a fat headed Priest and other whose names I know not, with certain al∣so of the Cōmissioners, at S. Maryes Oueries church in Southwarke, in the presence, of three C. people at the least, the xv. day of Iune. An. 1557.
* 1.1Woodman, you were before vs the last day and would not be acknowne in anye wise that you were sent to prison for heresie, and called for your accusers and stoode stoutly in defending of your selfe, and in youre departing I had thought you had spoken agaynst priestes Mariages, thinking by youre wordes wee shoulde haue found you an honest man, and conformable when we had called you before vs agayne. You tolde such a fayre tale for your selfe, as though you had bene free from all that was layd to your charge. For you sayde it was all lyes that I tolde agaynst you: but since I haue proued the contrarye, as here is your owne hand to shew. By the which I haue proued that you reproued not the priest for lacking of au∣thoritie, and because he had not put away his wife, but be∣cause you liked not hys preaching. For in deede I tooke it that you reproued him for because hee was not lawfully authorised, but I haue proued the contrary since.
I told you not that I did either reproue hym for lacke of authoritie, or because I liked not his preachynge, but I told you wherefore I was first sent to prison. For you sayd I was sēt to prison for heresie, & made a long tale agaynst me. And in deede I told you that there was neuer a word of your sayinges true, but was all lyes, as it was in deed. For I neuer was sent to prison for heresie, neither held I any then, nor do now. I take heauen and earthe to witnesse, but I tolde you I was sent to prison vppon the breach of a Statute, which was for speaking to a Priest in the Pulpit, and for that cause the Iustices of that country had thought I had offended the Statute, and called me be¦fore them, and would haue had me to haue bene bound to my good abearing, and because I refused it, they sent me to prisō. And these be ye wordes of the Statute, as I told you ye last day. If any man do interrupt any preacher or prea∣chers, lawfully authorised by the Queenes Maiestie, or by any o∣ther lawfull Ordinary,* 1.2 that then euery partie that so offendeth, shall suffer three monthes imprisonment, and furthermore be brought to the quarter Sessions, and there being sorye for the the same, aad also bound for his good abearing, one whole yeare, to be released, or els to remayne to prison agayne.
And when I was in prison, I bought a Statute book which when I had perused ouer,* 1.3 I founde by the wordes therof that I had not offēded, because he was not lawful∣ly authorised, as the Bishop of London was certified by the handes almost of xxx. men: both Esquiers, Gentlemen and Yeomen, the chiefest in all that Countrey. For he had not put away his wife, and therefore the Statute took no place on me, as I told you the other daye. Wherefore my Lord of London seeing me hauing so muche wrong, dyd like a good man to me in that matter, & released me. Now when I had tolde you this matter, you bad the Sheriffe haue me away: You sayd you were glad I h••lde agaynst Priestes Mariages, because I aunswered to the question you asked me.
My Lord, do you not heare what he sayth by my Lord of London?* 1.4 He sayth he is a good man in that he released him, but he meaneth that hee is good in nothyng els.
What? can you tell what I meane? let euerye man say as he findeth: he did iustly to me in that matter. I saye if he be not good in any thing els, as you say, he shal aun∣swere for it, and not I: for I haue nothing to doe wyth o∣thers mens matters.
Well, how say you? howe liked you his preaching? I pray you tell vs.
That is no matter how I liked it. How soeuer I liked it, I offended not the Statute.* 1.5 Wherefore you haue nothing to say to me for that I am sure.
Well, how like you this then? Here is youre owne hand writing: I am sure you will not denye it. Will you looke on it?
It is mine owne handy worke in deede, the which by Gods helpe I will neuer denye, nor neuer did yet, I prayse God therefore.
And heare is good geare I tell you. I praye you harken wel to it: these be the wordes, before the Com∣missioners. How say you? Doe you not beleeue, as soone as the wordes be spoken by the Priest, that there remay∣neth neyther bread nor wyne, but onely the verye bodye of Christ, both flesh and bloud as he was borne of the vir∣gine Mary? these were the wordes of the Commissio∣ners.
And then thou saydest: thou durst not saye otherwise then the scripture sayth.* 1.6 I cannot finde (sayde you) that it is the body of Christ before it is receaued by fayth, bring∣ing in the xxii. of Luke, saying: Christ sayde, take, eate, this is my body: so I cannot proue that it is his bodye before it is eaten. Then sayd the Commissioners: did not Iudas eate Christes body? And if you can proue that Iud••s is saued (sayd you) I must graunt that he eate his body. For christ sayth in the sixt of Iohn: Who so eateth my fleshe and dryn∣keth my bloud, hath eternall lyfe, and I will rayse hym vp at the last day: which words prooue (said you) that if Iudas eate the body of Christ, he must needes be saued. How say you now? did Iudas eate the body of Christ, or no?
Then I perceiued they went about nothyng but to catch words of me in his Dioces, to condemn me with.* 1.7 Though I should confound him neuer so much, I per∣ceiued that he was fully bent thereto. To whom I answe∣red and sayd:
I will answer you to no such thing, for I am none of your Dioces: Wherfore I will not answer to you.
Thou art within my Diocesse, and thou hast offended within my Dioces: and therefore I will haue to do with thee.
Haue to do with me and you will:* 1.8 but I wil haue nothing to do with you. I tell you plainly: For though I be now in your Dioces, I haue not offended in your dio∣ces: if I haue, shew me wherein.
Mary here is thine owne hand writyng, the which thou affirmedst in my Dioces.
I do not deny, but it is myne owne hand writing: but that prooueth neuer the more that I haue offended in your Diocesse: for that doth but declare what talke there was betwixt the Commissioners and me, the which you haue nothing to do withall.
No? hold hym a booke, and thou shalt sweare, whether thou holdest it now or not, & whether thou wro∣test it not in my Dioces, as I thinke thou didst: Lay thy hand on the booke.
I wil not be sworne for you:* 1.9 for I am not of your Dioces, and therfore you haue nothyng to doe with mee. And as for the writing of that same, I neuer wrote worde of it in your Dioces.
No? did you not? my Lord let me see: I wyll finde where you wrote it.
Then he tooke it & looked on it, and anone he found that I was sent for out of the Kings bench, to come before the Commissioners.
My Lord, here you may see it was in the Kinges Bench, the which is in your Dioces.
Although I were fet out of the Kings Bench, that