The Oration of Byshop Brookes in closing vp this examination agaynst Doctour Cranmer Arch∣bishop of Caunterbury.
MAister Cranmer, I cannot otherwise terme you cō∣sidering your obstinacy, I am right sory, I am ryght hartely sory to heare suche wordes escape your mouthe so vnaduisedly.* 1.1 I had conceaued a right good hope of your amendement: I supposed that this obstinacy of youres came not of a vayne glory, but rather of a corrupte consci∣ence, which was the occasion that I hoped so well of your returne. But now I perceaue by your foolish bable, that it is farre otherwise. Ye are so puffed vp with vayn glory there is such a cauteria of heresie crept into your conscience, that I am cleane voyd of hope, and my hope is turned in∣to perdition? who can saue that which will be lost? GOD woulde haue you to be saued, and you refuse it. Perditio tua super te Israel, tantummodo in me saluatio tua, ait Dominus per Prophetam. i. Thy perdition is onely vpon thy selfe, O Is∣raell: onely in me is thy saluation, sayth the Lord by hys Prophet. You haue vttered so erronious talke, with such open malice agaynst the popes holines, with such open li∣yng against the church of Rome, with such open blasphe∣my agaynst the sacrament of the Aultar, that no mouthe could haue expressed more maliciously, more lyingly, more blasphemously.
To reason with you, although I would of my selfe to satisfie this audience,* 1.2 yet may I not by our Commission, neither can I finde how I may doe it with the scriptures: For the Apostle doth commaund that suche a one shoulde not onely not be talked withall, but also shunned and a∣uoyded saying: Hereticum hominem post vnum aut alterum conuentum, deuita, sciens quòd huiusmodi peruersus est & de∣linquit, quum sit proprio iudicio condemnatus. i. An heretical person after once or twise conferring, shunne, knowing yt he is peruerse and sinneth, being of his owne iudgement condemned. Ye haue bene conferred withall not once or twise, but oftentimes, ye haue oft bene louingly admony∣shed, ye haue bene oft secretly disputed with. And the last yeare in the opē schoole, in open disputations ye haue bene openly conuict, ye haue bene openly driuen out of ye schole with hisses, your bookes which ye bragge you made seuen yeares agoe, and no man aunswered it: Marcus Antonius hath sufficiently detected and confuted, and ye persist styll in your wonted heresie.
Wherefore being so oft admonished, conferred withal, and conuicted) if ye deny you to be the manne whome the Apostle noteth, heare then what Origine sayth, who wrote aboue 1300. yeares ago: and interpreteth the saying of the Apostle in this wise, in Apologia Pamphili.* 1.3 Hereticus est om∣nis ille habendus, qui Christo se credere profitetur & aliter de Christi veritate sentit quàm se habet Ecclesiastica traditio. Euen now ye professed a kinde of Christianitie and holines vn∣to vs, for at your beginning you fell downe vppon youre knees, and sayde the Lordes prayer (God wotte lyke an hipocrite) and then standing vppon youre feete, you re∣hearsed the articles of your fayth, but to what end I pray you els, but to cloke that inwarde heresie rooted in you that you might blind the poore simple and vnlearned peo∣ples eyes? For what will they say or thinke, if they do not thus say? Good Lord, what meaneth these men to say that he is an hereticke, they are deceiued, this is a good Chri∣stian, he beleueth as we beleue.
But is this sufficient to escape the name of an here∣ticke? To the simple and vnlearned it is sufficient,* 1.4 but for you that haue professed a greater knowledge and hygher doctrine, it is not enoughe to recite your beliefe. For vn∣lesse (as Origine sayth) yee beleeue all thynges that the Churche hath decreed besides, you are no Christian man. In the whiche because you doe halte and wyll come to no conformitie: from henceforthe yee are to bee taken for an hereticke, with whome wee ought neither to dis∣pute, neyther to reason, whom we ought rather to eschew and auoyd.
Neuerthelesse, althoughe I doe not entende to reason with you, but to geue you vp as an abiect and outcast frō Gods fauour, yet because yee haue vttered to the annoy∣ing of the people such pestilent heresies as may do harme among some rude and vnlearned, I thinke meete and not abs re, somewhat to say herein: not because I hope to haue any good at your handes, which I would willingly wysh but that I may establish the simple people whiche be here present, least they being seduced by youre diabolicall doc∣trine, may pearish thereby.
And first (as it behoueth euery man to purge himselfe first before he enter with anye other) where you accuse me of an othe made agaynst the Byshop of Rome, I confesse it and deny it not, and therefore do say with the rest of this Realme, good and catholicke men, the saying of the Pro∣phet: Pec cauimus cum patribus nostris, iniustè egimus,* 1.5 iniqui∣tatem fecimus. i. Wee haue sinned with oure fathers: wee haue done vniustly, and wickedlye. Delicta inuentutis meae, & ignorantias meas ne memineris Domine. i. The sinnes of my youth, and my ignoraunces, O Lord doe not remember. I was then a young man, and as young a scholer here in the vniuersitie.
I knew not then what an othe did meane, and yet to saye the truthe, I did it compulsed, compulsed I saye by you Mayster Cranmer, and here were you the authoure and cause of my periury, you are to be blamed herein, and not I. Now where you say I made two othes, the one contrary to the other, it is not so, for the othe I made to the Popes holinesse, appertayneth onely to spirituall thinges. The other othe that I made to the king, pertay∣neth onely to Temporall thinges: that is to saye, that I doe acknowledge all my temporall liuinges to proceede onely from the kinge and from none els. But all menne may see, as you agree in this, so ye agree in the rest of your opinions.
Now sir, as concerning the Supremacye whiche is onely dew to the sea of Rome, a worde or two.* 1.6 Althoughe there be a number of places whiche do confirme that christ appoynted Peter head of the Churche, yet this is a moste euident place. When Christe demaunded of his Apostles whom men called him: they aunswered: some Elias, some a Prophet. &c. But Christe replyed to Peter, and sayde: Whome sayest thou Peter that I am? Peter aunswered: Tu es Christus silius Dei, and Christ replyed: Tu es Petrus & super hanc Petram aedificabo aecclesiam meam. The Doctours enterpreting this place, super hanc Petram expounded it, id est, non solum super fidem Petri sed super te Petre. And why did Christ chaunge his name from Simon to Peter,* 1.7 whiche in latine is a stone, but onely to declare that he was onely the foundation and head of the Churche.
Agayne, where Christe demaunded of Peter beyng a∣mongst the rest of his Apostles 3. tymes a rew, Petre amas me▪ he gaue him charge ouer his sheep Pasce oues meas pasce agnos meos. Whiche place Chrysostome interpreting sayth, Pasce, hoc est, loco mei esto praepositus & caput fratrum tuorū. To conclude, when they came that required Didrachina of Christ, he commaunded Peter to cast his net into the sea,* 1.8 and to take out of the fishes mouth that hee tooke staterem hoc est duplex Didrachma, & da inquit pro te & me Petre Whi∣che wordes do signifie, that when hee had payed for them