Rogers.
The Catholike Church I neuer did nor will dis∣sen•• from.
L. Chancel.
Nay, but I speake of the state of the Catholike church, in that wyse in which we stand now in England, hauyng receaued the Pope to be supreme head.
Rog.
I know none other head but Christ, of his catholike church, neither will I acknowledge the Bishop of Rome to haue any more authority then any other bishop hath by the word of God, and by the doctrine of the olde and pure Catholike church 400. yeres after Christ.
L. Chaun.
Why didst thou then acknowledge King Henry the 8. to be supreme head of the church, if Christ be the one∣ly head?
Rog.
I neuer graunted hym to haue any supremacy in spi∣rituall thyngs, as are the forgeuenesse of sinnes, geuing of the holy Ghost, authoritie to be a Iudge aboue the worde of God.
L. Chan.
Yea said he, and Tonstall B. of Duresme, and N. B. of Worcester, if thou hadst said so in his dayes (and they nodded the hed at me, with a laughter) thou hadst not ben alyue now.
Rog.
Which thing I denied, and would haue told how hee was said and ment to be supreme head. But they looked & laughed one vpon another, and made such a busines, that I was cōstrayned to let it passe. There lyeth also no great waight thereupon: for all the world knoweth what the meanyng was. The L. Chancellor also sayd to the L. Wil. Haward, that there was no inconuenience therin, to haue Christ to be supreme head, and the B. of Rome also: and when I was ready to haue answered that there could not be two heds of one church, and haue more plainly declared the vanity of that his reason, the L. Chancellor said: what saist thou? make vs a direct answer whether thou wilt be one of this catholike church, or not, with vs in the state in which we are now?
Rog.
My L. without faile I cannot beleeue, that ye your selues do thinke in your harts that he is supreme head in forgeuing of sinne. &c. (as is before sayd) seyng you, & all the bishops of the realme haue now xx. yeares long prea∣ched, and some of you also written to the contrary, and the Parliament hath so long agone condescended vnto it. And there he interrupted me thus.
L. Chan.
Tush that Parlament was with most great cru∣eltie constrained to abolish and put away the primacie frō the bishops of Rome.
Rog.
With crueltie? Why then I perceyue that you take a wrong way with crueltie to perswade mens consciences. For it should appeare by your doyngs now, that the cru∣elty then vsed hath not perswaded your consciences▪ How would you then haue our consciences, perswaded wyth cruelty.
L. Chan.
I talke to thee of no cruelty, but that they were so often & so cruelly called vpon in that Parlament, to let the Act go forward, yea and euen with force driuen thereunto, where as in this parliament it was so vniformly receiued, as is aforesayd.
Rog.
Here my L. Paget told me more plainly, what my L. Chauncellor ment. Unto whom I answered: My Lord what will ye conclude thereby? that the first Parliament was of lesse authoritie, because but few condescended vnto it? and this last Parliament of great authoritye, because more condescended vnto it? It goeth not (my Lord) by the more or lesser part, but by the wyser, truer, & godlier part: and I would haue sayd more, but the L. Chauncellour in∣terrupted me with his question, willyng me once agayne to aunswer him. For (sayd he) we haue mo to speake▪ with thē thou, which must come in after thee. And so there were in deed ten persons moe out of Newgate, besides two that were not called. Of which ten, one was a citizen of Lon∣don, which graunted vnto them, and ix. of the contrarye: which all came to prison agayne, and refused the cardinals blessing, and the authoritie of his holy fathers Church, sa∣uyng that one of these ix. was not asked the question other wyse then thus, whether hee would be an honest man as his father was before hym, and aunswering yea, he was so discharged by the friendship of my Lord William Ha∣ward (as I haue vnderstanded): He bade me tell hym what I would doe: whether I would enter into one Church with the whole Realme as it is now, or not? No, sayd I, I will first see it prooued by the Scriptures. Let me haue pen, inke, and bookes, &c. And I shall take vpon me plainly to set out the matter, so that the contrary shall be prooued to be true, & let any man that wil, conferre with me by writyng.
L. Chan.
Nay, that shall not be permitted thee. Thou shalt neuer haue so much profered thee as thou hast now, if thou refuse it, and wilt not now condescend and agree to the ca∣tholike church. Here are ij. things, Mercy, and Iustice: If thou refuse the Queenes mercy now, then shalt thou haue Iustice ministred vnto thee.
Rog.
I neuer offended, nor was disobediēt vnto her grace, and yet I will not refuse her mercy. But if this shal be de∣nied me to conferre by writing, and to try out the truth▪ then it is not wel, but to far out of the way. Ye your selues (all the Bishops of the Realme) brought me to the know¦ledge of the pretensed primacie of the Bishop of Rome, when I was a yong man twenty yeares past: and wil ye now without collation▪ haue me to say and do the contra∣ry? I cannot be so perswaded.
L. Chan.
If thou wilt not receiue the Bishop of Rome to be supreme head of the Catholike Church, then thou shalt neuer haue her mercy thou maist be sure. And as touching conferring and triall, I am forbidden by the Scriptures to vse any conferring and triall with thee. For S. Paule teacheth me that I shall shun and eschew an heretike after one or two monitions, knowing that such an one is ouer∣throwen and is faulty, in as much as he is condemned by his owne iudgement.
Rog.
My L. I deny that I am an heretike: prooue ye that first, and then alledge the foresayd text. But still the Lord Chancellor played on one string, saying.
L. Chan.
If thou wilt enter into one Church with vs, &c. tell vs that, or els thou shalt neuer haue so much proferred thee agayne, as thou hast now.
Rog.
I will fynd it first in the Scripture, and see it tryed therby, before I receiue hym to be supreme head.
Wor.
Why? do ye not know what is in your Creed: Credo ecclesiam sanctam catholicam. I beleeue the holy Catholike Church.
Rog.
I fynde not the bishop of Rome there. For [Catho∣like] signifieth not the Romish Church: It signifieth the consent of all true teaching Churches of all tymes, and all ages. But how should the Bishop of Romes Church bee one of them which teacheth so many doctrines yt are plain∣ly and directly against the word of God? Can that bishop be the true head of the Catholike Church that doth so? that is not possible.
L. Chancellor.
Shew me one of them, one, one, let me heare one.
Rog.
I remembred my selfe, that amongst so many I were best to shew one, and sayd I will shew you one.
L. Chan.
Let me heare that, let me heare that.
Rog.
The B. of Rome and hys Church, say, read, and sing all that they do in their congregations, in Latin, which is directly and plainly against the first to the Corrinthians, the 14. chapter.
L. Chan.
I deny that, I deny that, that is against the word of God. Let me see you prooue that, how prooue ye that?
Rog.
Thus I began to say the text from the beginning of the chap. Qui loquitur lingua, &c. to speake with tonge sayd I, is to speake with a strange tong: as Latine or Greeke, &c. and so to speake, is not to speake vnto mē, but to God. But ye speak in Latin, which is a strange tong, wherfore ye speake not vnto men, but vnto God (meanyng God only at the most.) This he graunted, that they speake not vnto men, but vnto God.
L. Chan.
Well, then it is in vayne vnto men.
Rog.
No, not in vaine. For one man speaketh in one tong, and another in another tong, and all well.
L. Chan.
Nay I wil prooue then, that he speaketh neyther to God nor to man, but vnto the wynde.
Rog.
I was willing to haue declared how and after what sort these two textes do agree (for they must agree, they be both the sayings of the holy Ghost, spoken by the Apostle Paule) as to witte, to speake, not to men, but vnto God▪ and to speake into the wynd: and so to haue gone forward with the proofe of my matter begon, but here arose a noyse and a confusion. Then sayd the L. Chancellor.
L. Chan.
To speake vnto God, and not vnto God, were vnpossible.
Rog.
I will prooue them possible.
L. Haward.
No sayd my Lorde William Haward to my L. Chauncellour: nowe will I beare you witnesse that hee is out of the way. For he graunted first, that they whiche speake in a straunge speach, speake vnto God: and now he sayth the contrary, that they speake neither to God, nor to man.
Rog.
I haue not graunted or sayde (turning me to my L. Haward) as ye report. I haue alledged the one text, and now I am come to the other. They must agree, and I can make them to agree. But as for you, you vnderstand not the matter.
L. Haward.
I vnderstand so much, that that is not possi∣ble. This is a poynte of Sophistrie, quoth Secretarye Bourne.
L. Chan.
Then the Lord Chauncellor began to tell the L.