his house, by the teaching of Iohn Iue, she was brought to that beliefe, and so forth from thence dayly, till this time of detection, she hath continued.
And besides that (sayd he) when my children Christofer and Iohn, being about seauen yeares of age, were then taught of me in my house the said errour of the Sacrament of the aultar, and by the sayd Agnes my wife diuers times, she was alwayes of one mind in the said misbeliefe against the Sacrament of the aultar, that it was not Christes bo∣dy, flesh and bloud, but only bread. Furthermore, being ex∣amined how he knew that she was stedfast in the sayd er∣rour, he sayd that she alwaies without contradiction affir∣med this teaching, and sayde, the sayd opinion was good, and was well contented that her children aforesaid, were of the same opinions againste the Sacramente of the aul∣tar, &c. Ex verbis Registri.
The Byshop with his Catholicke Doctours, not yet contented with this, to set the husband agaynst the wyfe, proceeding further in their Catholicke zeale, caused her two children Christofer and Iohn to be produced, one of the age of xxij. the other of xix. against their owne naturall mother. Who likewise being pressed with their othe, wit∣nessed and sayd, that the foresaid Agnes their mother held, beleeued, taught, and defended, that the Sacrament of the aultar was but bread, and not the very body of Christ, fleshe, and bloud: That Baptisme was no better in the Fount, then out of the Fount: That confirmation was of no effect: That the solemnisation of Matrimony was no sacrament: That confession to God alone was sufficient: Also that going in pilgrimage and worshipping of Saints and Images was of none effect, &c. Item, that their fa∣ther and the sayd Agnes their mother helde, taught, and communed of the sayd errours within their house diuers times, by the space of those three yeares past, as well on holy dayes, as working dayes, affirming and teaching that the saide opinions were good and lawfull, and to be holden and maintained, and agreemente was made a∣mongst them, that none of them should discouer or bewray eyther of these beliefes in any wise. Finally, that they ne∣uer heard their sayd father and mother, holding nor rea∣ching any other opinions, then be the said errours against the Sacrament of the altar, and pilgrimages, offerings, worshipping of Saints and Images, as farre as they could remember, &c. Ex verbis Regist.
Heere hast thou (Christian reader) before thine eyes, an horrible spectacle of a singular, yea of a double impietie, first of an vnnaturall husband, witnessing against his own wife: and of as vnnaturall children, accusing and witnes∣sing against their owne naturall mother. Which although they had so done, the cause being of it selfe iust and true (as it was not) yet had they done more then nature woulde haue led them to do. Now the case being such, as which by Gods word standeth firme, sound, and perfect, what im∣pietie were it for men to accuse a poore innocent in case of heresie, which is no heresie? Now besides all this, the hus∣band to come in against his owne wife, and the children to bring in the knife wherewith to cut the throate of theyr owne naturall mother that bare them, that nourished thē, that brought them vp, what is this, but impietie vpon im∣pietie, prodigious and horrible for all Christian eares to heare? And yet the greatest impietie of all resteth in these pretensed Catholickes and Clergiemen, which weare the authors and causers of all this mischiefe.
The cause why this good woman so stood (as she dyd) in the deniall of these foresaid articles obiected, was thys, for that she neuer thought that her husband and her owne children, who onely were priuie of her Religion, would testifie agaynst her. Whom notwithstanding after she per∣ceaued to come in, and to depose this agaynst her, deny∣ing stil as she did before) that she did euer hold such maner of errours, and being now destitute of all frends and com∣fort, brast out in these woordes openly (as the register re∣porteth) that she repented the time that euer she bare those children of her body. And thus the Archb. with his Doc∣tours hauing now the thing that they sought for, albeit she was ready to deny all errours, and to conforme her selfe to theyr religion, yet notwithstanding, they refusing her rea∣dines and conformitie, proceeded to theyr sentence, and so condemned her to death.
After whose condemnation, next was brought to exa∣mination Rob. Harrison, whom in like maner, because, he stoode in his deniall, contrary witnesses agaynst him were produced: to wit, Christofer Grebyll. W. Rich, W. Olberd Agnes Iue, who a litle before had bene abiured, and ther∣fore were so much the more apt and appliable to serue the Bishops humour for daunger of relapse. After the deposi∣tion & conuiction of which witnesses, although he submit∣ted himselfe to repentaunce and conformitie, yet notwyth∣standing it would not be receaued, but sentence was read & he condemned with the other two aforesayd, vnto ye fire.
And thus these three were condemned and burned, & certificate geuen vp of them together to the king frō War∣rham the Archbishop vpon the same. An. 1511. Maij. 2. Ex Regist. Cant.
Ouer and besides these three godly martyrs aboue re∣cited. I finde in the foresayd Registers of W. Warrham, ij. other godly like martirs also in the same yeare, and for the same xij. articles aboue specified, to be condemned vpon ye depositions of certayne witnesses brought in agaynst thē, to wyt. Tho. Harwod, Phillip Harwod, Stephen Caste∣lyn, W. Baker, Rob. Reynold, Ioh. Bāpton, Rob. Bright W. Rich. &c. whereupon they were adiudged likewise for heretickes to be burned, the yeare aforesayd. 1511. ye names of which two martyrs were Iohn Brown, and Edward Walker. Ex Regist. W. Warrh. fol. 179.
Nowe as you haue heard the names of these blessed Martyrs, with their articles recited, let vs also heare the tenor of the Bishops sentence, by the which they were con∣demned one after an other. Their sentence contayneth one vniforme maner of wordes in forme as followeth.