The 6. Article.
Agreeably to the ancient errors of Iohn Wickliffe and Iohn Hus Archheretikes condempned in the Councell of Constance,* 1.1 he hath affirmed and preached that the cler∣gy ought not to possesse or haue any temporall possessions, neyther to haue any iurisdiction or authoritie in temporal∣ties, euen ouer theyr owne subiectes, but that all these things ought to be taken from them, as it is at this present in England.
The Lord in the xviij. chapter of the booke of Num∣bers sayd thus vnto Aaron,* 1.2 thou shalt possesse nothyng in theyr land, neyther shalt thou haue any portion amongest them, I am thy portion and inheritage amongst the chil∣dren of Israell for vnto the sonnes of Leuy, I haue geuen all the tithes of Israel, that they should possesse them for their ministery which they do execute in the tent of ordina∣ries. Albeit I do not doubt, but that the order of the Le∣uites and of our clergy, is farre different and variable. For the administration of theyr sacred and holy thyngs, after theyr death, passed vnto their posterity, as it were by right of inheritaunce: which happeneth not vnto the posteritie of our clergy in these dayes. Furthermore, if any heritage be prouided or gotten for them, I doe not gaynesay but that they shall possesse it. But still I doe affirme that all temporall iurisdiction should bee taken from them, for when as twise there rose a contention amongst the Disci∣ples, which of them should be thought the greatest Christ, aunswered: The kyngs of nations haue dominion ouer them, and such which haue power ouer them, are called be∣neficiall, you shall not do so. For he which is greatest a∣mongst you, shall be made equall vnto the yongest or lest, and he which is the prince or ruler amongst you, shall be