Actes and monuments of matters most speciall and memorable, happenyng in the Church. [vol. 2, part 1] with an vniuersall history of the same, wherein is set forth at large the whole race and course of the Church, from the primitiue age to these latter tymes of ours, with the bloudy times, horrible troubles, and great persecutions agaynst the true martyrs of Christ, sought and wrought as well by heathen emperours, as nowe lately practised by Romish prelates, especially in this realme of England and Scotland. Newly reuised and recognised, partly also augmented, and now the fourth time agayne published and recommended to the studious reader, by the author (through the helpe of Christ our Lord) Iohn Foxe, which desireth thee good reader to helpe him with thy prayer.

About this Item

Title
Actes and monuments of matters most speciall and memorable, happenyng in the Church. [vol. 2, part 1] with an vniuersall history of the same, wherein is set forth at large the whole race and course of the Church, from the primitiue age to these latter tymes of ours, with the bloudy times, horrible troubles, and great persecutions agaynst the true martyrs of Christ, sought and wrought as well by heathen emperours, as nowe lately practised by Romish prelates, especially in this realme of England and Scotland. Newly reuised and recognised, partly also augmented, and now the fourth time agayne published and recommended to the studious reader, by the author (through the helpe of Christ our Lord) Iohn Foxe, which desireth thee good reader to helpe him with thy prayer.
Author
Foxe, John, 1516-1587.
Publication
[At London :: Imprinted by Iohn Daye, dwellyng ouer Aldersgate beneath S. Martins],
An. 1583. Mens. Octobr.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Martyrs -- Great Britain -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A67926.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Actes and monuments of matters most speciall and memorable, happenyng in the Church. [vol. 2, part 1] with an vniuersall history of the same, wherein is set forth at large the whole race and course of the Church, from the primitiue age to these latter tymes of ours, with the bloudy times, horrible troubles, and great persecutions agaynst the true martyrs of Christ, sought and wrought as well by heathen emperours, as nowe lately practised by Romish prelates, especially in this realme of England and Scotland. Newly reuised and recognised, partly also augmented, and now the fourth time agayne published and recommended to the studious reader, by the author (through the helpe of Christ our Lord) Iohn Foxe, which desireth thee good reader to helpe him with thy prayer." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A67926.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 18, 2025.

Pages

¶The fourth and fift Articles of vowes and Priestes Mariage.

As we haue discoursed before by histories and order of tyme,* 1.1 the antiquitie of the iij. former Articles aboue men∣tioned, to witte, of trāsubstātiation, of the halfe cōmunion and of priuate Masses, so now commyng to the Article of vowes and of Priestes mariage, the reader will looke per∣chaunce to be satisfied in this likewise, as in the other be∣fore & to be certified from what cōtinuaunce of tyme these vowes & vnmaried lyfe of Priests haue continued.* 1.2 Wher∣in although sufficient hath bene sayd before in the former processe of this history, as in the life of Anselmus. pag. 195. also of Pope Hildebrād, pag. 175. &c. yet for the better esta∣blishing of ye readers mynde agaynst this wicked article of Priests mariage, it shalbe no great labour lost, here briefly to recapitulate in the tractatiō of this matter, either what before hath bene sayd, or what more is to be added.

Page 1149

And to the entent that the world may see and iudge the sayd lawe and decree of Priests single sole life, to be a doc∣trine of no auncient standing heere within this Realme, but only since the time of Anselmus,* 1.3 I will first alledge for me the wordes of Henr. Huntyngton. lib. 7. De historia Anglo∣rum heere following.

Eodem anno ad festum Michaelis tenuit Anselmus Archiepis∣copus Concilium apud Londonias: In quo prohibuit sacerdoti∣bus Anglorum, vxores antea non prohibitas. Quod quibusdam mundissimum visum est, quibusdam periculosum: ne dum mun∣dicias viribus maiores appeterent, in immundicias horribiles ad Christiani nominis summum dedecus inciderent, &c. That is, The same yeare at the feast of S. Michaell. Anselme the Archby∣shop of Canterbury held a Synode at London:* 1.4 In the which Sy∣node he forefended Priestes heere in Englande to haue wiues, which they were not inhibited before to haue. Which constitu∣tion seemed to some persons very pure and chaste. To othersome againe it seemed very dangerous,* 1.5 least while that men should take vpon them such chastitie more then they should be able to beare, by that occasion they might happily fall into horrible filthines, whiche shoulde redound to the exceeding slaunder of christian profession, &c.

Albeit I deny not but before the time also of Anselmus, both Odo, and after him Dunstane Archb. of Canterbury, and Ethelwold B. of Winchester, and Oswold B. of Wor∣cester in the dayes of King Edgar, anno. 963. as they were all Monkes themselues, so were they great doers against the marriage of priests, placing in Monkes in Churches and Colledges,* 1.6 and putting out the married Priests as ye may read before pag. 153. Yet notwithstāding neither was that in many Churches, and also the priests then married, were not constrayned to leaue their wyues, nor theyr roumes, but onely at their owne choyce. For so writeth Malmesbury in vita Dunstani: Ita{que} clerici multarum Ecclesi∣arum,* 1.7 data optione, vt aut amictum mutarent, aut locis valedice∣rent, cessere, &c. That is: Therefore diuers & sondry clerkes of many Churches, being put to their choice, whether to chaunge their weede, or to part from their places, wente their waies, &c. So also Elfricus after them (of whome mention was made before) was somewhat busie in setting forward the single life of Priestes,* 1.8 and Lanfrancus lyke∣wise. But yet this restreynt of Priestes lawfull marriage was neuer publickely established for a lawe heere in the Church of England, before the cōming of Anselme in the daies of William Rufus, & king Henry 1. writing in these words: Boldly I commaunde by the authoritie which I haue by my Archbishoprike,* 1.9 not only within my Archbishoprike, but also throughout England, that all Priests that keepe women, shall be depriued of their Churches, and al ecclesiasticall benefices, &c. As ye may reade more at large before, page. 196. whiche was much about the same time whē as Hildebrand also at Rome begā to attempt the same matter, as before hath ben shewed: & also besides him were other Popes mo, as In∣nocent the 3. Pope Nicholas the 2. and Calixtus the 2. by whome the acte against Priests mariage was brought at length to his ful perfectiō, and so hath cōtinued euer since.

Long it were and tedious to recite here all such consti∣tutions of Councels prouinciall and generall, namely of ye councel of Carthage, & of Toledo, which seemed to worke something in that behalf, against the matrimony of priests. Againe, longer it were to number vp the names of al such bishops and priests, which notwithstāding haue bin ma∣ried since that time, in diuers countreys, as more amplye shall be shewed (the Lord willing) in the sequele hereof. In the meane season, as touching the age & time of this diue∣lish prohibition for priests to haue their wiues, thys is to be found by credible proofes, and conferring of histories, that in the yeare of our Sauiour 1067. at what time Pope Hildebrand began first to occupy the Papall chayre,* 1.10 this othe began first to be taken of Archbishops and Byshops, that they should suffer none to enter into the ministerie, or into any ecclesiasticall function hauing a wife: and lyke∣wise the Clergie to be bound to promise the same.

And this was (as I said) about the yeare of our Lorde, 1067. well approued and testified by course of hystories.* 1.11 Whereby appeareth the prophesie of S. Paule truely to be verified, speaking of these latter times. 1. Tim. 4. Where he writeth in these wordes. The spirit speaketh playnely, that in the latter times, there shall some depart from the faith, harkening vnto spirits of errour, and to doctrines of deuils, forbidding to marry, and commaunding to abstayne from meates, whiche the Lord hath created to be taken with thankesgeuing, &c.

In this prophesie of S. Paule ij. things are to be obser∣ued: First the matter which he prophesieth of, that is, the forbidding of mariage,* 1.12 and forbidding of meates, whiche God generally hath left free to all men. The second thyng in this prophesie to be noted, is the time whē this prophe∣sie shall fall, that is, in the latter times of the worlde. So that this concurreth right well with these yeares of Pope Hildebrand aforesayde, beeing a thousande yeares complete after the Ascension of our Sauiour: so that they may well be called the latter times.

This prophesie of S. Paule thus standing (as it doth firme and certain, that is,* 1.13 that forbidding of mariage must happen in the latter times of the world, then must it nedes consequently follow therby, that the maried life of priestes is more auncient in the Church, then is the single life, then the law I meane commaunding the single life of Priests. Which may soone be proued to be true, by the true count of times, and search of hystories.

For first at the Councell of Nice, it is notorious that this diuelish law of mariage to be restrained, was stopped by Paph••••tius.

2. Before this Councell of Nice, in the yeare of our Lord 180. we reade of Polycrates B. of Ephesus, who dissen∣ting from Pope Uictor about a certaine controuersie of Easter day, alledgeth for himselfe how his progenitoures before him 7. together, one after another, succeeded in that seate, and he now the 8. after them was placed in the same: vsing this his discent of his parents, not only as a defence of his cause, but also a glory to himselfe, &c.

3. Pope Syricius about the yeare of our Lord 390. wrote to the priests of Spaine about the same matter of putting their wiues from them, if his Epistle be not counterfeyte. These Spanish priestes had then with them a Byshop of Terragon. Who aunswering to Syricius in this behalfe, alledged the testimonies of S. Paule, that Priestes might lawfully retaine their wiues, &c.* 1.14 To this Syricius reply∣ed againe (if his writing be not forged) most arrogantly and no lesse ignorauntly, reprouing the Priests that were maried, and for the defence of his cause, alledged this sen∣tence of S. Paule: Si secundum carnem vixeritis, moriemini. That is: If ye shall liue after the flesh, ye shall die, &c. Whereby may appeare not onely howe they in Spaine then had wiues,* 1.15 but also how blinde these men were in the Scrip∣tures, which shewed themselues such aduersaries against Priests Mariage.

4. To be short, the further we go & nearer to the auncient time of the church, the lesse auncient we shall finde the de∣priuation of lawfull matrimony amongst christian mini∣sters, beginning if we will, with the Apostles, their ex∣amples and Canons, who although were not all maried, yet diuers of them were, and the rest had power and liber∣tie to haue and keepe their wiues, witnessing S. Paule, where he writeth of himselfe:* 1.16 Non habemus potestatem soro∣rem mulierem circumducendi sicut & reliqui Apostoli? That is to say: haue not we power to leade about a sister to wife, as also the other Apostles haue? Whereby is to be seene, both what he might do, and what the other Apostles did. Also Cle∣mens Alexandrinus, whiche was CC. yeares after Christe, Lib. Strom 7. denieth not but that Paul was maried beyng an Apostle, as well as Peter and Philp.* 1.17 And as the sayde Apostles in their doctrine admonishe all men to marrie that can not otherwise doe, sayeng to euery one beeyng in daunger of temptation: Vnusquisque suam vxorem habeat ne tentet vos Satanas, &c. That is, Let euery man haue his owne wife, least Sathan tempt you, &c. So likewise the same A∣postles in their Canons (as in the Popes Decrees cited) do precisely charge, that no Bishop nor priest,* 1.18 shoulde se∣quester from him his wife for any matter or pretence of re∣ligion, saieng: If anye shall teach that a priest for religion sake,* 1.19 ought to contemne his owne wife, let him be accursed, &c.

As for the Glose there in the margent, whiche expoun∣deth this word contemning for exhibiting things necessa∣rye for her sustenance, all the worlde may see that to bee a Glose of meere Sophistry.* 1.20 And because I haue here made mention of Clemens Alexandrinus, it shal not be to our pur∣pose impertinent, to inferre the wordes of this worthy writer, wherewith he doth defend Priests lawfull matri∣monie, against certayne vayne bosters of virginitie in his time. Dicunt gloriosi isti iactatores, se imitari dominum,* 1.21 qui ne∣que vxorem duxit, neque in mundo aliquid possedit: se magis quam alios Euangelium intellexisse gloriantes. That is: These glorious braggers doe vaunte themselues to bee the followers of the Lord, who neither had wife, nor yet possessed anye thing heere in the worlde, &c. And it follo∣weth: Eis autem dicit scriptura, deus superbus resistit, humilibus autem dat gratiam. Deinde nesciunt causam cur dominus vxorem non duxerit primum quidem propriam sponsam habuit ecclesiam. Deinde vero nec homo erat communis, vt opus ha∣beret etiam adiutore aliquo secundum carnem, &c. To these the Scripture maketh aunswere: God withstandeth the proude, and geueth grace to the humble. Agayne, they con∣sider not the cause why the Lorde tooke no wife.* 1.22 First he had his owne peculiar spouse: which is ye Church. More∣ouer, neither was he as a common man, that hee shoulde

Page 1153

stand in such neede of a helper after the fleshe, &c. And in the same booke a little after alleadging against them that ab∣horre matrimonie,* 1.23 he inferreth the wordes of S. Paule: how that in the latter dayes some shall fall from the faith atten∣ding to spirits of errour, and to doctrine of deuils, forbidding to marry, and to absteyne from meates, &c. Which place of Saint Paule, Clement heere applieth not against the Nouati∣ans, and them that condemne matrimony in generall in all men, as naught: but he applyeth it only against suche, as forbid mariage in part, and namely in Priests, &c.

* 1.24This Clement wrote after Christ two hundreth yeres, and yet if we come downeward to lower times, we shall finde both by the Councell of Gangren CCC. yeares, and also by the Councel of Nice CCCC. yeares after Christe, the same libertie of priestes mariage established and enac∣ted as a thing both good and godly. The wordes of Gan∣gren Councell be these: Si quis discernit Praesbyterum con∣iugatum, tanquam occasione nuptiarum, quod offerre non debe∣at,* 1.25 & ab eius oblatione ideo abstinet, anathema sit, &c. That is: If any do iudge that a Priest for his mariage sake, ought not to minister, and therefore doth abstaine from the same, let him be accursed.

Moreouer, proceeding yet in times and Chronicles of the Church, we shall come to the sixt Councell called Sy∣nodus Constantinopolitana,* 1.26 almost seauen C. yeares after Christ: the wordes of the which Councell be alleadged in the Decrees, and be these in Latine. Quoniam in Romani ordine canonis esse cognouimus traditum, eos qui ordinati sunt Diaconi vel Presbyteri, confiteri quod non suis iam copulentur vxoribus, antiquum sequentes canonem Apostolicae diligentiae & constitutiones sacrorum virorum, legales nuptias amodo va∣lere volumus, nullo modo cum vxoribus suis eorum connubia dissoluentes, aut priuantes eos familiaritate adinuicem, in tem∣pore oportuno, &c. That is: Because in the order of the Romaine Canon, we know it so to be receaued, that such as be Deacons and Priestes, shall professe themselues to haue no more copulation with their wiues, we following the auncient Canon of the diligent Apostles and constitu∣tions of holy men, enact that suche lawfull mariage, from henceforth, shall stande in force, in no case dissoluing theyr coniunction with their wiues, neither depriuing them of their mutuall societie and familiaritie together, in suche time as they shall thinke conuenient, &c. Hetherto ye haue heard the decree: heare now the penaltie in the same decree and distinction conteined. Si quis igitur praesumpserit contra Apostolicos canones aliquos Praesbyterorum & Diaconorum priuare à contactu & communione legalis vxoris suae depona∣tur, &c. That is: If any therefore shal presume, against the Canons of the Apostles,* 1.27 to depriue either priest or Dea∣con from the touching and companye of his lawfull wife, let him be depriued. And likewise this Priest and Deacon, whosoeuer for religion sake shall put away his wife, let him be excommunicate, &c. And the Councell of Gangren sayth: let him be accursed. By these wordes of the Councell recited, sixe things are to be noted.

1. First, how this Councell calleth ye Mariage of priestes lawfull, contrary to these vj. articles, and to a certeyne late Englishe writer of our countrey, entituling his booke a∣gainst the vnlawfull mariage of Priests.

2. In that this Councell so followeth the Canons of the Apostles, and constitutions of holy men: we haue to vn∣derstand, what the censure both of the Apostles: and de∣termination of other holy men were therein.

3. If the Iniunction of this Councell, agreeyng thus with the Apostles and holy men, stoode with truth, the contrary Canon of the Romaines, and also of these sixe English articles, must needes be condemned of errour.

4. By this Councell appeareth that so long time, almost 700. yeares after Christ, this prohibition of Priestes ma∣riage was not yet entred into the Orient Churche, but stoutely was holden out.

5. By the Romane Canon heere mentioned (which be∣gan with Gregorius 600. yeares after Christ, a little before this Councell) it can not be denied, but the Churche of Rome began then to disceuer, not onely from the veritie, but also from the vnitie of all other Churches, following the Apostolicke doctrine. Albeit the said Romane Canon, at that time stode not long, but was shortly disanulled by the sayd Gregorius agayne by the occasion of infants heads found in his fish pond, whereof (Christ willing) more shal be spoken heereafter.* 1.28

6. Sixtly, heere is to be noted & remēbred the craftie false packing, and fraude of the Romaines: which in the Latine booke of Councels, in diuers new impressions, haue sup∣pressed this Canon, because be like, it maketh little wt their purpose: plaieng much like with this, as Pope Zosimus Bonifacius and Celestinus played with ye sixt councel of Car∣thage, which for their supremacy would haue forged a false Canon of Nice, had not the Councell sent to Cōstantino∣ple for the true exemplar therof & so proued them open ly∣ers to their faces. So likewise this Canō aboue mētioned although it be omitted in some bookes, yet beyng found in the auncient & true written copies beyng alledged of Ni∣lus a Greeke Byshop of Thessalonica.* 1.29 CC. yeare tofore and moreouer beyng found & alledged in the Popes own booke of Decrees Distin. 31. must needes conuince them of manifest theft & falsehoode. Thus it may stand sufficiently proued that ye deprauation of Priestes lawfull mariage all this space was not entred into the church neither Greeke nor Latin,* 1.30 at least tooke no ful possession before Pope Hil∣debrandus tyme. Anno Domini. 1070 and especially Pope Calixtus time. Anno Domini. 1120. which were the first o∣pen extortors of Priestes mariage.

Auentinus a faythfulll writer of his tyme writyng of the Councell of Hildebrand, hath these wordes:* 1.31 Sacerdotes illa tempestate publicè vxores, sicut caeteri Christiani habebant filios procreabant, sicuti instrumentis donationū quae illi tem∣plis, Mystis, & Monachis fecere: vbi hae nominatim cum con∣iugibus testes citantur, & honesto vocabulo Praesbiterissae nū∣cupantur, inuenio Caesar tum. &c. That is: In those dayes Priestes commonly had wiues as other Christē men had, and had children also, as may appeare by auncient instru∣mentes, & deedes of gift, which were then giuen to Chur∣ches to the Clergy and to religious houses in the whiche instrumentes both the Priestes and their wiues also with them (which there be called Praesbyterissae) I finde to be al∣ledged for witnesses. It happened moreouer ye same tyme (sayth Auentine) that the Emperour had the inuestyng of diuers Archbyshoprickes, Byshoprickes, Abbayes and Nunries within his dominions, Pope Hildebrand dis∣daynyng agaynst both these sortes aforesayd, that is, both against them that were inuested by the Emperour and al∣so agaynst all those Priestes that had wiues, prouided so in his Coūcell at Rome, that they which were promoted by the Emperour into liuyngs of the Church were coun∣ted to come in by Symony: the other which were maryed Priestes were counted for Nicolaitanes. Wherupon pope Hildebrād writyng his letters to ye Emperour, to Dukes, Princes, and other great Prelates, and Potētates: name∣ly to Bertholdus, Zaringer, to Rodolphus of Sueuia, to Welphon of Bauaria, to Adalberon, and to their Ladyes, and to diuers other to whom he thought good: also to By∣shops, namely, to Otto Byshop of Constance, with other Priestes and lay people, willeth them in his letters to re∣fuse and to keepe no company with those Symoniake, and those Nicolaitane Priestes (for so were they termed then, which had either any Ecclesiasticall liuyng by the Empe∣rour, or els which had wiues to auoyd their Masses:* 1.32 nei∣ther talke, neither to eate nor drinke with them, nor once to speake to them, nor to salute them, but vtterly to shunne them, as men execrable and wicked, no otherwise thē they would eschue the plague or pestilence.

By reason whereof ensued a mighty schisme and affli∣ction among the flocke of Christ,* 1.33 such as lightly the lyke hath not bene seene. For the Priestes went agaynst their Byshops, the people agaynst the Priest, the laytie agaynst the Clergy: briefly all ranne together in heapes & in con∣fusion. Men and women, as euery one was set vpon mis∣chief, wickednesse, contention and auarice, tooke thereby occasion vpon euery light suspition, to resiste their Mini∣ster, to spoyle the goodes of the Church. The vulgare peo∣ple contemned the Priestes which had maryed wiues, de∣spised their Religion, and all thynges that they dyd: yea and in many places would purge the place where they had bene, with holy water, and brent their Tithes. Also such was, the mischief of them, that they would take the holy mysteries, whiche those maryed Priestes had conse∣crated, and cast them in the dyrt, & tread them vnder their feete: For so then had Hildebrand taught them, that those were no Priestes, neither that they were Sacramentes, whiche they did consecrate. So that by this occasion, ma∣ny false Prophets rose, seducing the people from the truth of Christ, by forged Fables, and false miracles, and feyned Gloses, wrastyng the Scriptures as serued best for their owne purposes. Of whom few there were that kept any true chastity. Many could make glorious boastes & brags thereof, but the greatest part vnder the shew & pretence of honesty & purenes of life cōmitted incest, fornication, adul∣tery, euery where almost, and no punishment was for the same. &c. Thus much out of Auentinus: Lib. 5. Annal.

To this testimony of Auentinus aboue mentioned, we will also adioyne the recorde of Gebuilerus a writer of this our latter tyme, and one also of their owne crewe,* 1.34 who doth testifie that in tyme of the Emperour Henricus the fourth,* 1.35 an. 1057. the number of 24. Byshops both in Ger∣many, Spayne, and in Fraunce, were maryed, with the

Page 1154

Cleargie also of their dioces.

Of the which Spanish Byshops we reade also in Isido∣rus, whiche wrote more then sixe hundreth yeares after Christ (and the place also cited in the Popes Distinctions) in his booke De clericorum vita,* 1.36 how they ought eyther to leade an honest chaste life, or else to keepe themselues within the bande of matrimonie, &c. Whereby is declared the single life of Priests, eyther to be then voluntary, or else their mariage not to be restrained as yet, by any law.

Moreouer, such Calistian Priestes as be nowe adayes, counting Priests mariage as a new deuise, and not stan∣ding with auncient times,* 1.37 let them looke vpon the Decree of Pope Symmachus, and answeare there to the Glose. Dist. 81. where it is written: Let Priests be all restrained from the conuersation of all women, except it be their mother, sister, or their owne wife, &c. Where the glose in the mar∣gent, geueth a note, saieng: Hic loquitur secundum antiqua tempora.

Thus if either the voyce of scripture might take place with these men which be so rigorous against Priestes ma∣riage:* 1.38 or if the examples of the Apostles might moue them (whome S. Ambrose witnesseth to haue bene all married, except onely Paule and Iohn) or else if the multitude of maried Bishops and Priestes might preuaile with them, heere might be rehearsed:

That Tertullian was a married Prieste, as witnesseth Hierome.

* 1.39Spiridion Byshop of Cyprus, had wife and children.

Hylary Byshop of Poytiers, was also maried.

Gregory Byshop of Nyssa.

Gregory Byshop of Nazianzum.

* 1.40Prosper Byshop of Rhegium.

Cheremon Byshop of Nylus. All these were married Byshops.

* 1.41Of Polychrates, and his 7. aunciters Byshops and ma∣ried men, we spake before.

Epiphanius Byshop of Constantinople in Iustinians tyme was the more commended, because his father & aun∣citers before him,* 1.42 were Priests and Byshops marryed.

Hierome sayth, that in his time, Plurimi Sacerdotes habe∣bant matrimonia. That is, many Priestes were then marri∣ed men.

Pope Damasus reciteth vp a great number of Byshops of Rome,* 1.43 which were Priests sonnes, as:

  • Syluerius. an. 544.
  • Deus dedit, aboute the yeare 622.
  • Adrianus 2. aboute the yeare 873.* 1.44
  • Foelix 3. about the yeare 474.
  • ...Hosius.
  • Agapetus. an. 534.
  • Gelasius, 484.
  • ...Bonifacius.
  • Theodorus, whose Father was Byshoppe of Hie∣rusalem, aboute the yeare 634.
  • Ioannes 10. an. 924.
  • Ioannes 15. the sonne of Leo a Priest, aboute the yeare 984.
  • ...Richarde Archdeacon of Couentry.
  • ...Henry Archdeacō of Hun∣tingdon.
  • ...Volusianus Byshop of Car∣thage.
  • ...Tho. Archbishop of Yorke, sonne of Sampson By∣shop of Worcester.

And howe many other Byshops and Priestes in other countreys besides these Bishops of Rome, might be an∣nexed to this Catalogue, if our leasure were such, to make a whole beaderole of them all?

In the meane time the wordes of Siluius Cardinall, & afterward B. of Rome, are not to be forgotten, whiche he wrote to a certeyne frende of his,* 1.45 whiche after his orders taken, was disposed to mariage. To whome the foresayde Syluius aunswereth agayne in these wordes folowing: Credimus te vti non insulso consilio, si cum nequeas continere, coniugium quaeris: quamuis id prius cogitandum fuerat, ante∣aquam initiaueris sacris ordinibus. Sed non sumus dij omnes qui futura prospicere valeamus. Quando huc ventum est, vt legi resistere nequeas, melius est nubere quàm vri, &c. That is: We beleeue that you in so doing, follow no sinister counsayle, in that you choose to be maried, when otherwise you are not able to liue chaste. Albeit this counsayle should haue come into your heade, before that you entred into Ecclesiasticall orders. But we are not all gods to foresee before, what shall happen heereafter. Now for so much as the matter and case standeth so, that you are not able to resist the lawe, better it is to marry then to burne, &c.

All these premisses well considered, it shall suffice, I trust though no more were sayd, to proue that this general law and prohibition of priests mariage pretended to be so aun∣cient, is of no such great time, nor lōg cōtinuance of yeres as they make it, but rather to be a late deuised doctrine gē∣dered by the Monkes, and grounded vpō no reason, law nor scripture, but that certeine, which be repiners against the truth, do racke and wrast a few places out of Doctors and ij. or iij. Councels for their pretensed purpose. Whose obiections and blinde cauillations, I as professing heete but to write stories, referre to the further discussion of Di∣uines: in whose bookes this matter is more at large to bee sought and searched. In the meane season so muche as ap∣perteyneth to the searching of times and antiquitie, and to the conseruation of such Actes and monuments as are be∣houeable for the Churche, I thought heereunto not vn∣profitable to be adioined a certaine Epistle learned and auncient of Uolusianus, Bishop sometimes of Carthage, tending to the defence of Priests lawfull wedlocke,* 1.46 which Aeneas Syluius in Descriptione Germaniae, also Illyricus in Ca∣tal. and Melancth. Lib. De coniugio do father vpon Huldericus Byshop of Augusta, in the time of Pope Nicholas 2. but as I finde it in an old written example, sent by Iohn Bale to Math. Archbishop of Canterbury, as it is ioyned in the same booke:* 1.47 so it beareth also the same title and name of Uolusianus Byshop of Carthage: ioining also withall, another Latine Epistle, whiche perhaps hath not bene seene in Print before. The Copies of which both Epistles as being pertinent to the purpose present, heere vnder en∣sue in forme as foloweth.

¶The epistle in Latin of Volusianus, or as some thinke of Huldericus Byshop of Augusta, to Pope Nicholas, agaynst the forbidding of Priestes Mariage.

Epistola Volusiani Carthaginensis Episcopi ad Nico∣laum Romanorum Episcopum.

¶Haec est rescriptio Volusiani Carthaginensis Episcopi, in qua Papae Nicolao de continentia clericorum, non iustè sed impiè, nec canonicè, sed indiscretè tractanti ita respondit.

Nicolao Domino & patri peruigili sanctae Romanae Ecclesiae Prouisori, Volusianus solo nomine Episcopus, amorem vt filius, timorem vt seruus.

CVm tua, ô Pater & Domine,* 2.1 decreta super clericorum conti∣nentia nuper mihi transmissa, à discretione inuenirem alie∣na, timor me turbauit cum tristitia. Timor quidem propter hoc, quod dicitur, pastoris sententia, siue iusta, siue iniusta timenda est. Timebam enim infirmis Scripturae auditoribus, qui vel iustae vix obediunt sententiae, ne iniustam conculcantes liberè, onerosa, imò importabili pastoris praeuaricatione praecepti, se obligarent. Tristitia verò vel compassio, dum considerabam, qua ratione membra cauere possent, capite suo tam graui morbo laborante. Quid enim grauius quid totius Ecclesiae compassione dignius, quam te summae sedis Pontificem, ad quem totius Ecclesiae spe∣ctat examen, à sancta discretione vel minimum exorbitare? Non parum quippe ab hac deuiasti, cum clericos, quos ad abstinenti∣am coniugij monere debebas, ad hanc imperiosa quadam violen∣tia cogi volebas. Nun quid enim meritò communi omnium sapi∣entum iudicio haec est violentia, cum contra Euangelicam insti∣tutionem, ac sancti Spiritus dictationem, ad priuata aliquis de∣creta cogitur exequenda?

Cum ergo plurima veteris ac noui Testamenti suppetant ex∣empla, sanctam (vt nosti) discretionem docentia,* 2.2 tuae rogone gra∣ue sit paterniati, vel pauca ex pluribus huic paginae interseri. Do∣minus quidem in veteri lege sacerdoti coniugium constituit, quod illi postmodum interdixisse non legitur. Sed idem in Euan∣gelio loquitur: Sunt eunuchi,* 2.3 qui se castrauerunt propter reg∣num caelorum, sed non omnes hoc verbum capiunt: qui potest capere, capiat. Quà propter Apostolus quoque ait: De virgini∣bus praeceptum Domini non habeo, consilium autem do. Qui e∣tiam iuxta praedictum Domini, non omnes hoc consilium cape∣re posse considerans, sed multos eiusdem consilij assentatores, ho∣minibus, non Deo, pro falsa specie continentiae placere volentes, grauiora vides committere, patrum scilicet vxores subagitare, masculorum ac pecudum amplexus non abhorrere:* 2.4 ne morbi huius aspersione ad usque pestilentiam conualescente, nimium status labefactetur Ecclesiae totius: Propter fornicationem, di∣xit, vnusquisque suam vxorem habeat. Quod specialiter ad laicos pertinere, ijdem mentiuntur hypocritae: qui licet in quouis sanc∣tissimo ordine constituti, alienis tamen vxoribus non dubitant abuti. Et quod flendo cernimus, omnes in supradictis saeuiunt sceleribus. Hi nimirum non rectè Scripturam intellexerunt,* 2.5 cu∣ius mamillam quia durius pressêre, sanguinem pro lacte bibe∣runt. Nam illud Apostolicum: Vnusquisque suam habeat vxo∣rem, nullum excipit verè, nisi professorem continentiae, vel eum qui de continuanda in Domino virginitate prefixit.

Quod nihilominus tuam, Pater venerande, condecet strenui∣tatem, vt omnem qui tibi manu vel ore votum faciens continen∣tiae, postea voluerit apotatare, aut ad votum exequendum ex de∣bito constringas, aut ab omni ordine, canonica autoritate depo∣nas: & hoc vt viriliter implere sufficias,* 2.6 me omnesque mei ordi∣nis viros adiutores habebis non pigros. Verùm vt huius voti nescios omninò scias non esse cogendos, audi Apostolum dicen∣tem

Page 1155

ad Timoth: Oportet (inquit) Episcopum irreprehensibilem esse, vnius vxoris virum. Quam sententiam ne quis ad solam Ec∣clesiam verteret, subiunxit: Qui autem domui suae praeesse ne∣scit, quomodo Ecclesiae Dei diligentiam habebit? Similiter in∣quit: Diaconi sint vnius vxoris viri, qui filijs suis bene praesint, & suis domibus. Hanc autem vxorem à sacerdote benedicendam esse, sancti Syluestri Papae decretis scio te sufficienter docuisse. His & huiusmodi sanctae Scripturae sententijs, Regulae clerico∣rum scriptor non immeritò concordans, ait: Clericus sit pudi∣cus, aut certè vnius matrimonij vinculo foederatus. Ex quibus omnibus veraciter colligit, quòd Episcopus & Diaconus repre∣hensibiles notantur, si in mulieribus multis diuiduntur. Si verò vnam sub obtentu religionis abijciunt, vtrunque, scilicet Episco∣pum & Diaconum, sine graduum differentia, hic Canonica dam∣nat sententia: Episcopus aut Presbyter vxorem propriam ne∣quaquam sub obtentu religionis abijciat, si verò reiecerit, ex∣communicetur:* 2.7 & si perseuerauerit, deijciatur. Sanctus quoque Augustinus, sanctae discretionis non inscius: Nullum, inquit, tam graue facinus est, quin admittendum sit, vt deuitetur peius.

Legimus praeterea in secundo Tripartitae Ecclesiasticae libro historiae, quòd cum Synodus Nicaena haec eadem vellet sancire decreta,* 2.8 vt videlicet Episcopi, Praesbyteri, Diaconi, post conse∣crationem à proprijs vxoribus vel omninò abstinerent, vel gra∣dum deponerent: surgens in medio Paphnutius, (ex illis Mar∣tyribus quos Maximus Imperator, oculis eorum dextris euulsis, & sinistris suris incisis, damnauit) contradixit, honorabiles con∣fessus nuptias, ac castitatem esse dicens connubium cum pro∣pria vxore: persuasitque Concilio ne talem ponerent legem: grauem asserens esse causam, quae aut ipsis, aut eorum coniugi∣bus occasio fornicationis existeret. Et haec quidem Paphnutius, licet nuptiarum expers, exposuit: Synodusque eius sententiam laudauit, & nihil ex hac parte sanciuit, sed hoc in vniuscuisque voluntate, non in necessitate dimisit.

Sunt verò aliqui, qui sanctum Gregorium suae sectae sumunt adiutorem: quorum quidem temeritatem rideo, ignorantiam doleo. Ignorant enim, quòd periculosum huius haeresis decre∣tum à S. Gregorio factum, condigno poenitentiae fructu post∣modum ab eodem sit purgatum. Quippè cùm die quadam in viuarium suum propter pisces misisset, & allata inde plus quam sex milia infantum capita videret, intima mox ductus poenitentia ingemuit,* 2.9 & factum à se de abstinētia decretū, tātae caedis causam cōfessus, cōdigno illud, vt dixi, poenitentiae fructu purgauit: su∣oque decreto prorsus damnato, Apostolicum illud laudauit con∣filium: Melius est nubere quàm vri: addens ex sua parte: Melius est nubere, quàm mortis occasionem praebere. Hunc forsitan rei euentum si illi mecum legissent,* 2.10 non tam temerè, credo, iudica∣rent, Dominicum saltem timentes praeceptum: Nolite iudicare, vt non iudicemini. Inde Paulus dicit: Tu quis es, qui iudicas ali∣enum seruum? suo Domino stat, aut cadit. Stabit autem: potens est enim Dominus statuere illum.* 2.11 Cesset ergo sanctitas tua co∣gere, quos tantùm deberet admonere: ne priuato (quod absit) praecepto, tam veteri quàm nouo contrarius inueniaris testa∣mento. Nam, vt ait sanctus Augustinus ad Donatum: Solum est quòd in tua iusticia pertimescimus, ne non pro lenitatis Christi∣anae consideratione, sed pro immanitate facinorum censeas coer∣cendum. Quod te per ipsum Christum ne facias obsecramus: sic enim peccata compescenda sunt, vt supersint quos peccasse poe∣niteat.* 2.12 Illud etiam Augustini volumus te recordari, quod ait: Nihil nocendi fiat cupiditate, omnia consulendi charitate: & ni∣hil fiat immaniter, nihil inhumaniter. Idem de eodem: In timore Christi in nomine Christi exhortor: Quicunque non habetis temporalia, habere non cupiatis: quicunque habetis, in eis non praesumatis. Dico autem, non si ista habetis, damnamini: sed si in istis praesumatis, damnamini: si propter talia magni vobis videa∣mini: si generis humani conditionem communem propter excel∣lentem vnitatem,* 2.13 obliuiscamini. Quod nimirum poculum dis∣cretionis ex illo fonte Apostolicae hauserat praedicationis: So∣lutus es ab vxore, noli quaerere vxorem: alligatus es vxori, noli quaerere solutionem. Vbi & subditur: Qui habent vxores, sint tanquam non habentes: & qui vtuntur mundo, tanquam non v∣tantur. Idem dicit de vidua: Cui vult nubat, tantum in Domino. Nubere in Domino est, nihil in contrahendo cōnubio quod Do∣minus prohibeat, attentare. Ieremias quo{que} ait: Nolite cōfidere in verbis mendacij, dicētes: Templū Domini, templum Domini, tē∣plum Domini est. Quod Hieronimus exponens: Potest (inquit) & hoc illis virginibus conuenire,* 2.14 quae iactant pudicitiam suam im∣pudenti vultu: praeferunt castitatem, cum aliud habeat conscien∣tia: & nesciunt illam Apostoli definitionem de virgine, vt sit sanc∣ta corpore & spiritu. Quid enim prodest corporis pudicitia, ani∣mo constuprato, si caeteras virtutes, quas Propheticus sermo de∣scribit, non habuerit? Quas quidem, quia te aliquatenus habere videmus, & quia discretionem, licet in hac re neglectam, in alijs tamen vitae tuae constitutionibus eam honestè conseruatam non ignoramus: huius intentionis prauitatem te citò correcturum non desperamus. Et ideo non quanta possumus grauitate, istam licet grauissimam negligentiā corripimus, vel iudicamus. Quan∣quam enim secundū vocabula quae vsus obtinuit, sit Episcopatus Praesbyterio maior: tamen Augustinus Hieronymo minor est, & à minori quolibet non est refugienda correptio: praesertim cum is qui corripitur, & contra veritatem, & pro hominibus niti inuenitur. Ne{que} enim, vt ait sanctus Augustinus ad Bonifaciū: Quorumlibet disputationes, quam uis catholicorū & laudato∣rum virorum, velut Scripturas Canonicas habere debemus: vt non liceat nobis salua honorificentia, quae illis debetur, aliquid in eorū scriptis improbare at{que} respuere, si fortè inuenerimus quòd aliter senserint quàm veritas habeat, diuino adiutorio vel ab alijs intellecta, vel à nobis. Quid autem veritati magis contrariū, quàm hoc, quòd cum ipsa veritas de continentia lo∣quens, nō vnius hominis,* 2.15 sed omnium planè (non excepto nu∣mero professorum continentiae) dicat: Qui potest capere, ca∣piat: isti (nescitur vnde instigati) dicant: Qui non potest cape∣re, feriatur anathemate?

Quid verò per homines fieri potest stolidius? quid diuinae maledictioni obligatius, quàm cum aliqui, vel Episcopi videli∣cet, vel Archidiaconi, ita praecepites sint in libidinem, vt ne{que} a∣dulteria, neque incestus, neque masculorum (proh pudor) tur∣pissimos amplexus sciant abhorrere: casta clericorum cōiugia sibi dicant foetere, & ab eis non verae iusticiae compassione, sed falsae iusticiae dedignatione, non vt conseruos rogent cōtinere, sed vt seruos iubeant ac cogant abstinere? Ad cuius imperij, ne dicam consilij, tam fatuam, tam{que} turpē addunt suggestionem, vt dicāt: Honestius est pluribus occultè implicari, quàm aper∣tè in hominū vultu & conscientia cum vna legari. Quod pro∣fectò nō dicerent, si ex illo & in illo essent, qui dicit: Vae vobis Pharisaeis, qui omnia facitis propter homines. Et per Psalmistā: Qui hominibus placent, confusi sunt,* 2.16 quoniam Dominus spre∣uit eos. Hi sunt, qui prius deberent nobis persuadere, vt in cō∣spectu eius, cui omnia nuda & aperta sunt, erubescamus pec∣catores esse, quàm in conspectu hominū mundi esse. Licet ergo merito suae prauitatis, nullius consiliū mereantur pietatis, nos tamē memores humanitatis diuinae, eis consilium authoritatis nunquam à pietate vacantis, per viscera ministramus charita∣tis. Dicimus nempe:* 2.17 Eiice primùm hypocrita trabem de ocu∣lo tuo, & tunc perspicies vt eiicias festucā de oculo fratris tui.

Illud quoque rogamus eos attendere, quod Dominus di∣cit de muliere: Qui sine peccato est vestrûm, primus in eam la∣pidem mittat, quasi dieret: Si lex iubet, si Moses iubet,* 2.18 iubeo & ego, sed competentes legis ministros exigo. Attendentes, quid adducitis, attendite quaeso & quid estis: quia, si te ipsum, vt ait Scriptura, perspexeris, nulli vnquam detraxeris. Signifi∣catum est autem nobis de quibusdā eorum, quod tanta apud se intumescant elatione, vt gregem Domini,* 2.19 pro quo boni pasto∣res animas non dubitant ponere, isti verberibus etiam abs{que} ra∣tione praesumant laniare. Quorum sentētiam S. Gregorius ni∣mium deplorans ait: Quid fiet de ouibus, quando pastores lu∣pi fiunt? Sed quis vincitur, nisi qui saeuit? quis verò persecutorē iudicabit, nisi qui dorsū suū ad flagella patienter ministrauit?* 2.20 Operae praecium est autē, vt audiatur, quo fructu tantū Eccle∣siae Dei inducabant scandalū, tantū cleris despectum, & ab ipsis Episcopis, & ab eorum infidelibus patiatur. Nec enim eos in∣fideles dicere dubitauerim, de quibus Paulus Apostolus dicit ad Timotheum: Quia in nouissimis temporibus discedēt qui∣dam a fide, attendentes spiritibus erroris,* 2.21 & doctrinis daemo∣niorum, in hypocrisi loquentium mendacium, & cauteriatam habentium conscientiam, prohibentium nubere.

Hic est autem, si diligēter inspiciatur, totius eorum manipu∣lus zizaniae, totius euentus insaniae,* 2.22 vt dum clerici licita vnius mulieris cōsortia, Pharisaico deuicti (quod absit) furore, relin∣quere cogātur, fornicatores & adulteri & aliarum prauitatum turpissimi ministri cum ipsis efficiantur. Qui hanc in Ecclesia Dei haeresim, sicut caeci duces caecorū machinantur, vt videlicet illud impleatur quod Psalmista eis, vt pote doctoribus erroris, taliter imprecatur: Obscurentur oculi eorum ne videant. &c. Quia ergo nemo, ô Apostolice, ignorat,* 2.23 quòd si tu per tui de∣creti sententiam, tantam futuram esse pestilentiam solitae dis∣cretionis claritate perspexisses, nūquam quorumlibet tam pra∣uis suggestionibus consensisses: debitae tibi subiectionis fideli∣tate consulimus, vt vel nūc ad tanti scandali ab Ecclesia Dei pro pulsionē euigiles: & qua nosti discretionis disciplina, Phari∣saicā ab ouili Dei extirpes doctrinā, ne scilicet vnica Sunami∣tis, adulterinis diutius vsa maritis, gentem sanctam, regale sa∣cerdotium, per irrecuperabile à sponso Christo videlicet, auel∣lat diuortium: dum nemo sine castimonia, non tantum in vir∣ginali flore, sed etiam in coniugali habita coniunctione, visu∣rus sit Dominum nostrum: qui cum Deo patre & Spiritu san∣cto viuit & regnat per omnia saecula saeculorum. Amen.

As touchyng the antiquitie of this Epistle aboue pre∣fixed it appeareth by the copie which I haue sene, & recea∣ued of the aboue named Matthew Archbyshop of Cāter∣bury, to be of an old & aunciēt writyng, both by the forme of the characters, and by the wearyng of the Partchment, almost consumed by length of yeares and tyme.

And as cōcernyng the author therof, the superscriptiō (if it be true) playnely declareth it to be the Epistle of Uo∣lusianus Byshop of Carthage. Albeit heretofore it hath

Page 1156

commonly bene taken and alleaged by the name of Hul∣dericus Byshop of Augusta, and partely appeareth to be so, both by the testimony of Aeneas Syluius, in Descriptione Germaniae, who in the said treatise affirmeth that Hulderi∣cus Byshop of Augusta, did constantly resist the Pope a∣bolishing the mariage of Priests, &c. and also by the record of Illyricus, testifieng that the said epistle not only remai∣neth yet to this day in old monumentes, but also that hee himselfe did see two exemplars of the same, both preten∣ding the name of the sayde Huldericus to bee the author. Notwithstanding this copie heere aboue prefixed, beareth the title not of Huldericus Bishop of Augusta, but of Uo∣lusianus Bishop of Carthage in Aphricke, as ye may see by the words of the preamble, sayeng, This is the rescripte of Volusianus Byshop of Carthage, vnto Pope Nicholás concer∣ning Priests not to be restrayned from lawfull marriage, &c.

Furthermore, which Pope Nicholas this was to whōe these epistles were written, it is not plainely shewed in the same, but that by probable coniecture it may be gessed ra∣ther to be Pope Nicholas 2. for so much as in his time, Priestes mariage began somewhat earnestly to be called in, more then at other times before

Now as touching the English▪ of this Latine epistle a∣boue exhibited,* 2.24 forasmuch as the same is before inserted, page 157. we will referre the reader vnto the same place. Wherein if the translation of the English doe swarue any thing from the Latin heere aboue prefixed, the cause was, for that the Latine copie which heere we follow, came not before to our hands.

¶Another epistle of the said Volusianus, concer∣ning marriage not to be restrayned from priestes and ministers of the Church.

CVm sub liberi arbitrij potestate creati simus, & non sub lege, sed sub gratia, qualiter creati sumus, viuamus. Vos qui conti∣nentiae legem nobis inuitis, imponitis, liberi arbitrij nos potesta∣te priuatis. Quod nolumus velle, & quod volumus nolle cogen∣do imperatis, & imperando cogitis: & legis vinculo, à quo ipsa gratia nos in libertatem liberati sumus,* 3.1 alligare, & spiritum ser∣uitutis iterum in timore accipere, ipsamque gratiam, sine qua ni∣hil facere possumus, omninò euacuare satagitis, ita vt (sicut ait Apostolus) ipsa gratia iam non sit gratia, & Dei donum non sit Dei donum: Et non ex Deo sed ex homine, nec ex vocante, sed ex operante: cum idem Apostolus dicat: Quia non est volentis ne∣que currentis, sed Dei miserentis.

Nam cùm sint▪ tria principalia & quasi effectiua, per quae omnis anima humana capax & compos rationis,* 3.2 quicquid spiritalis bo∣ni apprehendere & percipere potest, apprehendit & percipit, & sine quibus nihil prorsus capere possit: liberum arbītrium vide∣licet, Mandatum, & gratia (libero enim arbitrio bona à malis de∣cernimus atque eligimus: mandato ad omnia facienda prouoca∣mur ac incitamur: gratia promouemur & adiuuamur) horum omnium tamen gratia Domina & Magistra & quasi praepotens imperatrix & Regina est, ad cuius nutum caetera pendent, & ab ea vim & efficaciam expectant, & sine illa nihil praeualent, sed quasi stolida & mortua,* 3.3 sicut materia sine forma, iacent & subiacent. Loco enim materiae, secundum propositionem aliquam, liberum arbitrium possumus accipere non incongruè: Gratiam verò, lo∣co formae: Mandatum autem quod medium est quasi instrumen∣tum, ad vtrunque respicere, quo summus artifex Dominus libe∣rum arbitrium quasi stolidam materiam moueat & promoueat, & formam gratiae illi componat. Et sicut materia sine form est hor∣rida & deformis: ita liberum arbitrium est horridum & deforme sine gratia superueniente se mouente & promouente, mandato medio quasi instrumento (vt diximus) interueniente. Quod ergò forma in materia, hoc in libero arbitrio per quandam similitudi∣nem est gratia: & quod materia sub forma, hoc idem est libera vo∣luntas sub gratia.* 3.4 Et item, quod est instrumentum ipsorum, hoc est mandatum ad vtrunque istorum. Instrumentum namque sor∣didam materiam, & horridam atque asperam, obscuram, & quasi coecam emaculat & expolit, & claram, planam ac lucidam, forma superueniente, reddit. Sic & mandatum, liberum arbitium sordi∣dum & horridum, asperum & incultum, obscuum & coecū, niti∣dat, comit, lenit, & excolit, lucidat, & illuminat: sicut Propheta di∣cit:* 3.5 praeceptum domini lucidum, illuminans oculos, splendore gratiae superueniente. Et sicut materia & instrumentum sine for∣ma nihil valent, ita libera voluntas & mandatum sine gratia nihil virtutis habent. Quid enim liberum arbitrium vel mandatum si∣ne gratia praeueniente & subsequente potest▪ Gratia namque ad liberum arbitrium,* 3.6 mandatum quasi nuntium ac famulum mittit: mandatum liberum arbitrium prouocat atque quasi sopitum ex∣citat, vt ad bona facienda euigilet & exurgat, viamque ei quam peragere debeat, quasi coeco deducendo demonstrat. Quorum vtrunque▪ si à gratia deseritur, nihil omninò per se potest. Quod si conatur, deficit, non proficit, neque etiam efficit, vel perficit. Si praesumit, non assumit, sed potius to tam operam & laborem fru∣stra consumit. Cùm enim mandatum, seu per hominem siue per Angelū mittitur, & etiam liberum abitrium seu humano seu an∣gelico mandati nuntio cōmouetur, prouocatur, & instruitur, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 diuina gratia comitetur, praeueniat, & subsequatur, quid valebi•••• Quid nempè homini in paradiso posito mandatū quod audiuit: E omni ligno Paradisi comede, de ligno vero scientiae boni & mali ne comedat? Nihil prorsus ad salutem,* 3.7 sed potius ad condemnati∣onem. Quare? Quia gratia saluatrix & auxiliatrix defuit, quā ille iniustè suis viribus fisus, cōtempsit. Aut quid valuit Israelitico po∣pulo in Eremo cōstituto, mandatū legis quod per Moyse accepit, cui obedire neglexit?* 3.8 Aut quid profuit illi qui Dominū se qui suo arbitrio, & nō illius vocatione praesumit dicens: Domine, sequa te quocun{que} ieris. Ex multis alijs diuinae scripturae locis noui & veteris Testamenti demōstrari potest, quòd ne{que} mandatū, neque liberū arbitriū per se quicquā valet, nisi diuina gratia praeuenien∣do▪ & subsequendo adiuuet. Cùm igitur continentiae bonū, imò omne bonū sit solius diuinae gratiae donū, nec per mandatum,* 3.9 nec per liberū arbitriū cōprehendatur, errant & frustrà laborant qui se suis viribus illud apprehendere entant. Illi etiam magis errant qui hoc inuitis & nolentibus imperant, & nō spōtaneè sed coactè in Sacrarium Dei dona offerre suadent, nescientes aut obliti illius quod Dominus Moysi & Moyses à Domino praecepit dicens Se∣parate apud vos primitias Domino: quisque voluntarius & bono animo offerat eas Domino. Quid est separare apud vos primitias Domino,* 3.10 nisi studiosa cogitatione & meditatione in cordibus vestris tractare, & cum discretione deponere & diuidere, quid Domino de thesauro cordis nostri valeamus offerre? Si enim rec∣tè offeras & non rectè diuidas, peccasti. Et quid est prono animo offerre, nisi quod ait Psalmista: voluntariè sacrificabo tibi? Et A∣postolus: Non ex tristitia aut necessitate: Hilarem datorem dili∣git Deus. Et Salomon, Bono animo gloriam redde Domino, & in omni Dato hilarem fac vultum tuum, & in exultatione sanctifica decimas tuas, & in bono oculo facito adinuentionē manuū tua∣rū. Et Apostolus Iacobus:* 3.11 Nō amat Dominus (inquit) coacta ser∣uitia. Et, maledictus qui opus Domini facit negligenter .i. nō curi∣osè neque voluntariè. Sicut nos ergo Dominus inuitos aliquid offerre non iubet: ita vos inuitos aliquos offerre aliquid cogere, prohibet per eundem Moysen vbi ait:* 3.12 Ne facias Calumniam pro∣ximo tuo, nec vi opprimas eum. Calumniā proximo facere, est eū non cōpatiendo & miserando corrigere de peccato: sed dedigni∣do & exprobrando & detrahendo arguere & accusare, & non in spiritu lenitatis instruere, sed in spiritu asperitatis & austeritatis destruere, cum Apostolus dicat:* 3.13 Si praeoccupatus fuerit homo in aliquo delicto, vos qui spirituales estis instruite huiusmodi in spiritu lenitatis, considerans teipsum ne & tu tenteris. Vi oppri∣mere proximū, est vltra vires suas aliquid exigere, & onus quod portare nō potest imponere, imponētibus fortassis importabile,* 3.14 cùm Dominus de Pharisaeis ad Discipulos loquens, hoc eis pro∣hibeat dicens: Super cathredam Moysi sedent Scribe & Phari∣saei, &c. Et Apostolus Petrus: Pascite (inquit) qui in vobis est, gregem Domini, prouidentes, non coactè, sed spontaneè, secun∣dū Dominum: neque turpis lucri gratia, sed volūtariè: neque do∣minantes in Clero, sed forma estote gregi ex animo. Hic pastor pastorū, princeps Apostolorū, quid caeteri pastores vel Apostoli debeant facere, quomodo gregē Domini sibi creditum tractare, apertè & piè demonstrat atque insinuat, & quantam solicitudi∣nem & compassionem erga subditos habere oporteat, eis incul∣cat: & omnem potestatem tyrannicae dominationis vel ambitio∣nem cupiditatis, quam quidam in subditos sibi exercent, ab eo∣rum cordibus procul eliminat, & eos non dominos,* 3.15 sed patres subditorum debere esse pronunciat: neque eis aliquid typo po∣tentiae imperare, sed zelo pietatis admonere & obsecrare iuxta vires vniuscuiusque secundum Dominum, non secundum suae voluntatis arbitrium vel potestatis imperium: & illis formam esse gregi debere, vt quid alijs imperant, ipsi priores faciant, & non minus exemplis quam verbo proficiant. Ex animo▪ inquit: non ex imperio: ex voluntate, non coactione: ex charitate, non ex cupi∣ditate. Sunt enim plaerique qui zelo cupiditatis, nō charitatis ac∣censi, alijs imperant quod implere non valent: & dum lucrum a∣nimarum querere se simulant, lucrum potius terrenum captant. Quod bene Baalam propheta exprimit,* 3.16 qui prophetiae donum & benedicendi gratiam quam diuinitus acceperat, non ad vtilitatē aliorum, sed ad vsum suae cupiditatis vertit: & sicut nonnulli qui dum alios corrigunt, hoc zelo Dei facere se ostendunt, & dū me∣liores alijs se videri volunt, hoc praesumptione quadam & teme∣ritate agunt, & ideo in ipso praesumptionis suae & temeritatis actu corruunt. De quibus dicit Apostolus: Qui zelum Dei habent,* 3.17 sed non secundum scientiam. Zelum Dei secundum scientiam est ha∣bere, prouidè & cōsulte in diuinis rebus aliquid agere. Quorum profectio Oza similitudinem gerit, qui dum Arcam Domini cal∣citrantibus bobus qui eam portabant, inlinatum parumper e∣rigere voluit, mox dum ad eam manum tetendit, mortuus ceci∣dit. Arcam Domini calcitrantibus bobus inclinari▪ est legem Do∣mini quam ipsi sacerdotes portare & tenere debent ab eis nō ob∣seruando contradici, & quasi à recto statu in diuersam partem fle∣cti, quam Oza, qui adiutor dei interpretatur, erigere tentat: Quia sunt quidā Prelati, qui dum sacerdotalem ordinem▪ ipsam legem diuinā maligno excessu vel leuiter à sitae rectitudinis vta quasi in∣clinare & in aliam partem flectere vident, eam inclinationem ca∣stigere

Page 1157

& corrigere magis virtutis suae ostentatione quàm diuina emulatione praesumunt, & quia hoc inconsultè agunt dum ad∣iutores Dei videri appetunt, plerum{que} mortaliter in deterius ca∣dunt. Sunt & alij qui nullam infirmitatis humanae consideratio∣nem,* 3.18 nec vllum misericordiae respectum & compassionis affectū habent, & cum Apostolo dicere nescientes: Quis infirmatur & e∣go non infirmor? Dm se subditis non conditione qua pares, sed authoritate qua superiores sunt, conferunt, at{que} magistri videri, & plus prae esse quàm prodesse cupiunt,* 3.19 illorum infirmitatem vi do∣minationis premunt, & eos sibi obedire compellunt. Quod ni∣mirum illo facto figuratur, quod de Simone Cyrenaeo in Euan∣gelio legitur, quem angariauerunt persecutores Domini vt tol∣leret crucem eius. Cuius etiam nomen huic figurae conuenienter aptatur. Simon nam{que} interpretatur obediens. Simon verô, id est obediens, crucem Domini portare angariatur cum subiecti qui{que} à suis magistris vi dominationis vel authoritatis, el ana∣thematis pressi, & eis obedire compulsi, crucem continentiae pa∣tiuntur inuiti: ipsam{que} crucem quam portant, non amant, quia ip¦sam plus ad perniciem suam, quàm ad salutem portant, nec ipsa cruce peccato moriuntur,* 3.20 sed potius ipsi peccato viuificantur: Nam & alia peccata grauiora exindè oriūtur. Inhibito enim na∣turali vnius mulieris coniugio, surrepit non naturalis, sed contra naturam execrabilis Sodomitica fornicatio: surrepit illicita & damnabilis, non legitima sed contra legem alienae vxoris conta∣minatio, nec non etiam & meretricabilis nefanda pollutio: quin etiam abominabilis omnibus parentalis incestatio, vel aliarum multarum immundiciarum vel libidinum à diabolo inuentarum id genus, in quibus humana infirmitas periclitatur. Vnde Loth de Sodomitico incendio Angelo domini educente ereptus, & vx∣oris consortio viduatus, dum sua infirmittais cōscius ad montana non ausus est Angelo monente ascendere, ipse in Segor prua ci∣uitate quae iuxta erat, elegit habitare, ipso Angelo praecipiente & sic ad eum loquente:* 3.21 Salua animam tuam: noli respicere post ter∣gum, sed in monte saluum te fac, ne & tu simul pereas. Cui dixit▪ Loth: Quaeso Domine mi, quia inuenit seruus tuus gratiam corā te vt saluares me: non possum in monte saluari, ne fortè apprehē∣dat me malum & moriar. Est Ciuitas iuxta hic ad quam▪ possum fugere parua,* 3.22 & saluabor in ea. Quid est quod Loth à Sodomis fu∣giens praecipiente Angelo vt in monte saluaretur, montem ascē∣dere quia ibi mori timebat, noluit, sed Segor paruā ciuitatem iu∣xtà montem positam, vt in ea saluaretur, ad habitandum elegir, nisi quicun{que} fidelium Sodometicae libidinis incendium & peri∣culum euadere cupiens, dum celsitudinē virginalem non valet, & castitatis vidualis timet ascendere ne in ea periclitetur ad cō∣iugalem copulam cùm ad vtram{que} continentiam prula est & v∣tri{que} proxima,* 3.23 confugit? Nam{que} post continētias supradictas, haec castitas probatur laudabilis, & non priuatur praemio regni coele∣stis. Ad hanc castitatem, qui non potest continere, iubetur acce∣dere & in ea suluari, ne fortè si montem ascenderit, apprehendat eum malū & moriatur, & ne, si continentiam non sibi diuinitus concessam, suis viribus obtinere tentauerit, malum incontinenti∣ae vel fornicationis vel aliquarum supradictarum pes••••um eum apprehendat, & in eis mortaliter pereat. Sunt enim multi qui dū infirmitatem suam non considerant, & dum maiora se apprehen∣dere conantur, ipsa sua praecipitatione retroacti, in deteriora la∣buntur: quia dum maiora inconsultius ambiunt, minora quae tenere videbantur,* 3.24 amittunt. Quod sanè exemplo ipsius Loth a∣pertè demonstratur: qui dum relicta Segor quam ad habitandum elegerat, & in qua saluari petierat, in montem ascendit, ibi{que} man∣sit, in incestum filiarum suarum, ipsarum surreptione corruit, sicut scriptura dicit. Ita nam{que} scriptum est: Ascendit Loth de Segor & mansit in monte, dederunt{que} filia patri suo bibire vinum nocte il∣la, & ingressa est maior, dormiuit{que} cum patre. Quod nequaquam sibi contigisset, si in Segor in qua saluari poterat, ad praeceptum Angeli, sicut ille postulauerat, remaneret. Sed quia hoc quod sibi ab Angelo concessum fuerat, dereliquit, & quod concessum non fuerat,* 3.25 id postea sua voluntate contra praeceptum Angeli prae∣sumpsit, salutis suae dispendium pertulit, & graue incestus pecca∣tum incurrit. Sic pleris{que} contingit▪ qui dum quod sibi concessum est à Deo relinquunt, & id quod sibi concessum est ambiunt, & illud quod sibi concessum est perdunt, & illud quod sibi conces∣sum non est, aprehendunt. Quia sunt nonnulli, qui dum coniuga∣lem vitam quae sibi concessa est, & in qua saluari possent, vel in∣uiti vel volentes deserunt, & maiori profectus desiderio caelibem vitam actitare satagunt, salutem quam in illa habere poterant, perdunt, & periculum maximum in ista incurrunt, & ex quo pro∣ficere conabantur, magis deficiunt (& sicut supradiximus) in ma∣ioris ruinae voraginem vergunt. Quod bene Doctor gentiū Pau∣lus cōsiderans, & infirmis quibus{que} benignè prospiciens Corin∣thijs super his scriptis suis se consulentibus, ita rescripsit dicens: De quibus autem scripsistis mihi: bonum homini est mulierē non tangere:* 3.26 propter fornicationem autem vitandam, vnusquis{que} vxo∣rem suam habeat, & vnaquae{que} virum. Et vxori vir debitum red∣dat: similiter vxor viro. Et post pauca, Nolite (inquit) fraudari in∣uicem, nisi fortè ex consensu ad temptus, vt vacetis orationi: & i∣terum reuertimini in idipsum ne tentet vos Satanas propter incō∣tinentiam vestram: quoniam, sicut ait Poeta, non omnia possimus omnes: Et sicut Apostolus in superioribus dixit: Quia non est vo∣lentis ne{que} currentis, sed Dei miserentis: Et alibi:* 3.27 Quia vnicui{que} nostrum data est gratia secundum mensuram donationis Christi. Hanc mensuram vnicui{que} tenendam nec transgrediendam esse, docens mox intulit: Volo autem omnes homines esse sicut meip∣sum, sed vnusquis{que} proprium habet donum ex Deo, alius quidē sic▪ alius autem sic: Quia videlicet mensura nos arcendos, & de∣bere esse contentos in sequentibus intimauit dicens: Vnumquē∣{que} sicut vocauit Deus, ita ambulet. Et vnusquis{que} in qua uocatio∣ne vocatus est, in hac permaneat apud Deum Et hoc idem repetit paulò inferius causa confirmationis: Vnusquis{que} in quo vocarus est frater, in hoc permaneat apud Deum. Et quia infirmitatem humanā videbat non posse tollerare incentiua * 3.28 gemini calori▪ nisi per gratiam Dei, ne{que} vincere pugnam carnis aduersus spiri∣tum: & quia sic ipse dixit de se alibi Videbam aliam legē in mē∣bris meis, repugnantem legi mentis meae, hoc se misericorditer, & compatiēter, & vnanimiter, nō regulariter ne{que} imperatiuè dix isse, sicut in alia epistola, mōstrauerat vbi ait: Humanū dico prop∣ter infirmitatem carnis vestrae.* 3.29 Et in hac ipsa paulò superius in e∣odem schemate, vbi ait: Hoc autem dico secūdum indulgentiam, non secundum imperium, subdendo demonstrat: De virginibus autem preceptū Domini non habeo▪ consilium do tanquā miseri∣cordiā consecutus, vt sim fidelis. Id est, ea misericordi qua mihi Dominus consuluit quando ad fidem me vocauit, & sibi fidelem fecit, & ego alijs consulo & eandem misericordiā illis impendo. Et quoniam bonū est vtrum{que} cū vxore esse & sine vxore esse, & cū viro esse & cū viro non esse, ne{que} peccatum est vel cum vxore esse vel cū viro esse, mox subinfert dicēs: Estimo ergò bonū esse propter instantē necessitatē: quo niā bonū est homini esse sic. &c.

Quid est propter instantem necessitatem? Que est necessitas instans, nisi infirmitas praesens? Vel necessitas instans,* 3.30 est necessi∣tas vrgens & cogens prout necessitas extirerit vel coegerit. Vel instantem necessitatem dicit illius temporis necessitatem & an∣gustiam quae tunc extabat & cum cogebat vt talia scriberet & eis sic indulgeret causa scilicet vitandae fornicationis quae▪ tunc tem¦poris acciderat, & aliarum multarum fornicationum supradi∣ctarum quae accidere possent. Pro qua fornicatione hoc incaepit, & sibi scribentibus rescripsit, & Corinthijs in superioribus hu∣ius epistolae vehementer inuectus, in haec verba prorupit: Quid vultis? In verga veniam ad vos,* 3.31 an incharitate & spiritu mansue∣tudinis? Omninò auditur inter vos fornicatio, & talis fornicatio qualis nec inter gentes, ita vt vxorē patris sui quis habeat. Prop∣ter hanc ergo necessitatem vitandae fornicationis dico bonum es∣se homini sic esse, vt si continere non potest, nubat, vel vxorem accipiat, Quod exponendo subdit: Alligatus es vxori?* 3.32 Noli quae∣rere solutionem. Solutus es ab vxore? Noli querere vxorem. Si autem acceperis vxorem, non peccasti. Et si nupserit virgo, non peccauit. Et hic iterum non imperando sed indulgendo & com∣patiendo se dixisse ostendit: Ego autem vobis parco, id est, infir∣mitati vestrae cedo, Hoc ita{que} in potestate voluntatis vniuscuius{que} posuit vtrum velit eligire: nec se dicit cuiquam violentiam in∣ferre, nec laqueum quo eum astringat & teneat, inijcere, conse∣quenter subiungens: Porrò, hoc ad vtilitatem vestram dico: non vt laqueum vobis inijciam, sed ad id quod honestum est, & quod facultatem praebeat Dominum obsecrandi. Hoc dicit illis quos ad continentiam superius hortatus fuerat, & quos consortio vx∣oriae coniunctionis impediri, vel sollicitos esse nolebat. Alijs ve∣rò ita dicit: Si quis autem turpem videri se existimat super virgi∣nem suam, quod sit superadulta, & ita oportet fieri: quod vult, faciat: non peccat si nubat. Et iterum: vtrun{que} bonum esse▪ vnum tamen melius esse cōcludendo confirmat:* 3.33 Igitur qui matrimonio coniungit virginem suam, benè facit, & qui non iungit melius fa∣cit. Quod concordatur superiori sententiae vtri{que} sexui datae, in qua ait: Si acceperis vxorem non peccasti, & si nupserit virgo non peccauit. Si ergo virum accipere vxorem, & virginem nu∣bere, iuxta Apostolum peccatum non est, & beatitudinem non aufert, sed affert: & quia vter{que} bene facit, ideo ambo beati: nos qui vxores propter infirmitatem habemus, quid habendo pecca∣mus? Aut si Apostolus vnicui{que} propter fornicationem vxorem suam habere indulget & permittit, cur nos qui ex eadem massa sumus, & carnem peccati ex carne Adae peccatricem traximus, & continere non possumus, propter eandem causam & secundum eandem indulgentiam vxores habere non permittimut, & habi∣tas dimittere angariamur? Aut ita{que} vxores nobis habere imitātes Apostolum permittite, aut nos ex eadem massa non esse docete, aut nobis eandem indulgentiam, & permissionem non esse con∣cessam ab Apostolo, demonstrate. Quod opinor dicturi estis, quia haec indulgentia non fuit data ab Apostolo clericis aut alicui no∣stri ordinis, sed solis laicis. Quod ex verbis Apostoli vel ex cir∣cumstantia epistolae non potest defendi, cûm nulla ibi certa di∣stinctio vel denominatio habeatur personarum vel graduum siue professionum, nec ipse discernit seu nominibus seu officijs vel qui sibi scripserunt, vel de quibus, vel quibus ipse rescribebat, nisi tantū generaliter omni Ecelesiae Corinthiorum, sicut ipse in principio huius epistolae his verbis demōstrat:* 3.34 Paulus vocatus A∣postolus Christi Iesu per volūtatē Dei, & Sostenes frater, Ecclesiae Dei quae est Corinthi, sanctificatis in Christo Iesu, vocatis sanctis, cū omnibus qui inuocant nomē Domini. [Et post nonnulla alia, quae cōpendij causa hic rescidimus, haud ita multum ad rem atti∣nentia,

Page 1158

subinfert mox ad hunc modum:] Infirmitatem nostrā vos cōsiderate, ac miserari rogamus, & ne ei violentiā inferatis sup∣pliciter imploramus. Nam sicut iam satis superius inculcauimus vobis, null{us} ad cōtinētiā inuitus debet compelli. Ne{que} hoc genus virtutis vlli per legem Dei necessario imparutū est, sed volutaria deuotione Domino offerendū, dicēte ipso de hoc, Euangelio: Nō omnes capiunt verbū istud, sed quibus datū est. Ad quā tamē be∣nigna mox exhotatione eos qui possūt inuitat dicēs:* 3.35 Qui potest capere apiat. Vndè gratia distinctionis nō Moyses foeminalibus vestire Aaron & filios eius iubetur,* 3.36 vt de prioribus dicitur: vesties ijs Aarō fratrē tuū & filios eius cū eo: sed, facies (inquit) faemina∣lia linea vt operiant carnē turpitudinis suae. Ipsi (inquit) operian eanē turpitudinis suae, tu foeminalia pontifici & filijs eius faci∣es: tu castitatis regulam docebis: tu abstinendum ab vxorio com∣plexu eis qui Sacerdotio functuri sunt, intimabis: nulli tamē vio∣lentū huiusmodi continentiae iugū imponens: sed quicunque Sa∣cerdotes fieri ac ministerio altaris seruire volūt, ipsi sua sponte vx¦ori serui esse desistant. Quod vbi perfecerint, at{que} suscepto semel continentiae proposito, ministros se Sanctuarij at{que} Altaris fore consenserint, aderit diuina gratia quae velut caeteris illis habitū Sacerdotibus cōgruū imponens, quomodo viuere vel docere de∣beant, abundanter instituit. Qui sensus subsequentibus quoque Domini verbis affirmatur, quibus post pauca subiungit: Cùm{que} laueris patrē cū filijs aqua, indues Aaron vestimentis suis, id et, linea & tunica,* 3.37 & superhumerali, & rationali, quod stringes bal∣teo, & pones tiaram, & oleum vnctionis fundes super caput eius, at{que} hoc ritu consecrabitur. Filios quo{que} illius applicabis & indu∣es tunicis lineis, cinges{que} Aaron balteo, cilicet & liberos eius, & impones eis Mitras, erūt{que} Sacerdotes mei in religione perpetua: Nam{que} hic de foemmalibus à Moyse accipiēdis praecipitur. Vndè liquidò constat quod se hoc genere vestimēti ipse prius Aaron ac filij eius induerant, & ic ad manum Moysi lauādi, inducendi, vn∣gendi & consecrandi intrabant. Hic apertè ostenditur & docetur nulli continentiae iugum inuito imponendum, sed à Deo promp∣ta & deuota volūtate accipiendum. Quod & Dionysius Areopa∣gita theosophus, id est Deū sapiens, Pauli Apostoli Discipulus▪ & ab eo Atheniensium Archiepiscopus ordinatus, in epistola qua dam ad Pymtum Gnasiorum Episcopum missa, in qua plurima de nuptijs & castitate commemorat, sicut Ecclesiastica refert histo∣ria, monet, & precatur illum ne grauia onera discipulorū cerui∣cibus imponat, neue fratribus necessitatē cōpulsae castitatis in∣ducat, in qua nonnullorum pereclitatur infirmitas. At{que} Pymtus Dionysio rescripsit sententiā se consilij melioris quod ipse dabat, amplecti. Hoc iidem & Paphnutius vir diuinissimus at{que} castis∣simus, cùm in Niceno Concilio (vt in tripartita historia inueni∣mus) patres qui ibi aderant, hoc interdicere Sacerdotibus volu∣issent, in mediū eorū zelo humanae infirmitatis cōmotus & cōsci∣us exurgens, hoc ne facerent rogauit: quin potius in voluntate v∣niuscuius{que} ponerent exorauit, ne fortè per hoc locum darent & occasionē adulterio & fornicationi. Hac nam{que} cautela sancti vi∣ri in religione vtebantur, vt cùm de instructione & aedificatione subditorū aliquid agerent, & eos ad meliorē vitā de diuinis prae∣ceptis cōmoneri facerēt, cū patientia & mansuetudine potius o∣bedienda praeciperēt, quam cū potentia & austeritate imperarēt, nullū{que} inuitū sibi obedire cōpellerent. Quorū vos exempla se∣quentes qui eorum loco tenetis & nomen, ne nobis infirmis im∣portabilem sarcinam quaesumus imponatis,* 3.38 ne imprecatione do∣minica cū pharisaeis & egisperitis suscipiamini, in qua a••••: Ve vo∣bis legis periti, qui oneratis homines oheribus quae non possunt portari, & ipsi vno digito vestro ea non tangitis. Et ne clamo fili∣orū Israel ascendat ad Dominum propter duritiam eorū qui prae∣sūt operibus Ne{que} vos voletis facere eunuchos qui de vtero ma∣tris sic nati sunt,* 3.39 vel eos eunuchos qui violēter ab hominibus fa∣cti sunt, sed potius eos eunuchos, qui seipsos sua sponte eunuchi∣zauerunt propter regnum coelorum:* 3.40 neue sacris ordinibus & di∣uino mysterio propter nos tantū, calumniā faciatis vel inferatis, qui propter nostram vitam improbā illud hominibus cōtempti∣bile facitis, dum eis ne à nobis illud audiant & percipiant, prohi∣bitis:* 3.41 ac per hoc vitā improbam infamatis, & odorem nostrū corā Pharone & seruis eius faetêre facitis. Quod vos non rectè, si dici liceat (ne molestè accipiatis) videtur nobis, facere, & cōtra diui∣nā authoritatē & Canonicam regulā hoc {quod} facitis, esse: cùm Do∣minus per legislatorem dicat:* 3.42 Turpitudinē matris tuae nō reueles, & ignominia eius ne discooperias: Mater nostra Ecclesia est: Fi∣lij huius matris, quiquè fideliū sunt. Cuius tamē materna appel∣latio,* 3.43 maximà in Sacerdotibus est. Nam ipsi, generant fideles, & verbo praedicationis, & sacramento Baptismatis. An non mater erat quae dicebat: Filioli mei quos interum parturio? Turpitudo ergo & ignominia matris nostrae reprehēsibilis est actio Sacerdo∣talis vitae. Quae turpido tunc reuelatur, & ignominia discooperi∣tur, cū sacerdotalis vita publicè infamatur. Quod vos nimirū fa∣citis, qui fragilitatē nostrā quasi hactenus latentē & coopertam (quia eā nullus ita cognouerat) hominibus diffamatis, & propter eā diuina mysteria vel ministeria aspernāda sancitis. Quasi ad ea pertineat pollutio aliena,* 3.44 & ea polluat & cōmaculet immūdicia nostra cū Psalmographus dicat: Lex domini immaculata. Aut qua si illi nostro cōtagio cōtaminētur, quia ea ex nostro ore & ex no∣stro officio adipiscūtur.* 3.45 Quod si ita dicitis esse, nequaquā discipu¦lis & turbis de Pharisaeis Domin{us} praeciperaet: Omnia quaecū{que} di∣xerint vobis, seruate & facite Et rursus, si ita esset nequaquā Do∣minus Iudam quē urē esse scieba & proditorē suū futuū, cum discipulis alijs ad praedicandū mitteret, ne{que} potstatē signa ••••c∣endi & sanitates donādi, n{que} ad communionem sacoanctae cae∣nae eū admittéret. Et si immūdicia nostra diuina mysteria vel mi∣nisteria & eorū capaces & auditores insiceret & deterioraet, ne∣quaquā Dominus Leproū quē mūdauerat, āgeret, ne{que} ei o••••u∣lū daret, & nequaquā cū Simone alio Leproso māducaret, & ne∣quaquā à Maria peccatrice pedes suos osculari, & lachy•••••• la∣ari, & capillis tergi▪ & caput suum vngi permitteret. Hinc sacro∣rum Canonū veneranda authoritas sanxit, nullū qui etiam ab hae∣retico sacramēta dominica rectè perceperit, vlltenus ipsa haere∣tica prauitate corrumpi, nec vlla sacramēta illius cōtagione co∣maculari. Vndè Romana Ecclesia Anastasium Papam in quadam epistola ad Anastasium Imparatorem directa, decreuit & scripsit, quòd nullū de his vel quos baptizauit Acatius, vel quos Sacerdo∣tes vel Leuitas secundū Canones ordinauit, vlla eos ex nomine Acatij portio laesionis attingat, quo forsan per iniquum tadita sa∣cramēti gratia minus firma videatur. Nā & baptismū (quod pro∣cul sit ab Ecclesia) siue ab adultero, siue a fue datū fuerit, ad per∣cipientē non minus peruenit illibatum. Quid vox illa quae sonit per colūbā? Omnē maliciā vel maculā humanae pollutionis excla¦dit, qua declaratur ac dicitur: Hic est qui baptizat. &c. Nā si visibi∣lis solis istius radij cū per loca foetidissima transeunt,* 3.46 nulla cōta∣ctus inquinatione maculantur: multo magis virtus illius qui istū visibilē solē fecit, nulla mysterij dignitate cōstringitur. Quicquid ergo ad hominum profectum quilibet in Ecclesia minister pro of∣ficio suo videtur operari, hîc totū cōtinetur implēdo diuinitatis effectu. Ita ille per quē Christ{us} loquitur Paulus, affirmat: Ego plā∣taui, Apollo rigauit: sed deus incrementum dedit. A Deo nō qu∣ritur quis vel qualis praedicet: sed sic praedicet, vt inuidos etiā benè de Christo praedicare confirmet.* 3.47 Tanta est nam{que} diuinae potentia graciae, vt per malos acquirat bonos, & per reprobos & impro∣bos acquirat & colligat probos. His ita{que} authoritabus & alijs praedictis rationibus persuaderi debetis, ne{que} nos à diuini officij celebritate arcere, ne{que} illos quorū nihil interest, ab eius cōmuni∣one suspēdere. Quodsi mali sumus, nobis ipsis sumus▪ & plus no∣bis quàm alljs nocemus: & quos fortassè malos conspicitis, quid boni interius habeāt, ignoratis. Sūt enim pleri{que} quos de incōti∣nētia iudicatis, qui cōtinētiores sūt quàm illi quos de cōtinentia glorificatis. Qui habemus vxores, iuxta Apostolū tanquā non ha∣bemus. Quum videlicet cōtinētiā quia nobis nō potestis dare, o∣rate nobiscū & pro nobis, vt ille nobis donet,* 3.48 cuius hoc donū nos citur esse, & sine quo nemo poterit cōtinēs esse. Aliter enim illā habere nō possumus nisi ex totis precordijs illum oremus cuius hoc donū esse cognoscimus. Et hoc ipsū (inquit Salomō) est sapi∣entia, scire culus hoc donum est, & quoniam super hoc nihil est.* 3.49

The same in English.

FOrasmuche as we are created vnder the power of * 3.50 free will,* 3.51 & not vnder the law but vnder grace let vs so liue as we are created. You which lay vpon vs the law of con∣tinency agaynst our will, do depriue vs of the liberty of fre will. You commaund vs, and by commaunding compell vs to will that we would not, & not to will that we would do. You binde vs to the law, from the which by grace we are made free: and you constrayne vs to receiue the spirite of bondage agayn to feare: and go about to make the grace of God of no effect, without the which we can do nothing, so that, as the Apostle sayth: Grace is now no grace: and the gift of God is not the gift of God. And not of God, but of mā: not of him that calleth, but of him that worketh where as the Apostle sayth: It is not in him that willeth, nor in hym that runneth, but in God that sheweth mercy.* 3.52

For where as there be three principal & effectual things wherby euery humane soule endued with reason apprehē∣deth & perceiueth whatsoeuer spirituall thing it is able to apprehend and perceiue, and without the which it can per∣ceiue nothing: the which three thinges be these:* 3.53 to wit free will, the cōmaundement, and grace (for by free wil we dis∣cerne and chose the good from the euill: by the commaūde∣ment we are prouoked and styrred vp to do all thinges: by grace we are furthered & holpen to performe the same) yet of all these, grace is the Lady & Maistres, and as a mighty Empresse and Queene,* 3.54 vpon whose becke the other doe wayte and geue attendance, receiuing of her both strength and efficacy, and without her can do nothing, but remayne as thinges of themselues dull and dead, much like as a∣mongst the Philosophers, their Materia without Forma, be∣ing thereto adioyned. For in the stead of Materia, we maye, after a maner not vnfitly place free will: and in the place of Forma we may set grace, & the commaundement (which is the meane betwene them both,* 3.55 as a certayne instrumēt) to haue respect to both: whereby the principall Artificer which is God, furthereth and setteth forward free will as a rude dul matter, applieth to it his grace as ye forme ther∣of. And like as the sayde Materia without Forma, is rude and shapelesse, so free wil is a thing rude and deforme, if it

Page 1159

be not holpen with grace comming therunto, to moue it & to further it, the commaundement cōming as a meane be∣twene them both in the stead of the instrumentall cause, as is before sayd.

Therfore like as Forma is in respect of Materia, the like resemblaunce beareth free will in respect of grace. And a∣gayne, as Materia is in respect of Forma, the same also is free will in respect of grace.* 3.56 And as the instrument serueth be∣twene the foresayd Materia and Forma, so doth the commaū∣dement betwene free wil and grace. The instrument com∣ming and working vpon the sayd Materia being of it selfe ougle, rugged, and a thing without all shape and fashion, doth forme it, shape and pullish it, and maketh it hansome, lightly, lightsome, bright and cleare: euen so likewise the commaundement comming and working vpon free will, being of it selfe, a thing rude, grosse, vnshapen & deformed, blind and obscure, doth clarify it, decke 〈◊〉〈◊〉, adourne it, bew∣tifye and lighten it through the brightnesse of grace com∣ming vnto it, according to the saying of the Prophet: The ommaundement of the Lord is bright and cleare, geuing sight to the eyes.* 3.57

And as the matter & the instrument without the forme can do nothing, euen so free will and the commaundement without grace haue no power to worke. For what can ey∣ther free wll or the cōmandement do except they be holpē with grace both going before and folowing?* 3.58 For grace sē∣deth the commaundement as a messenger and minister to free will: the commandement prouoketh freewil and styr∣reth it vp, as out of a sleepe to do good workes and leadeth it as a blind man, by the hand, teaching him the way wher¦in to go. Which both if they be destitute of grace, are able of thēselues to do nothing. And if they beginne, yet they pro∣ceede not, neither do they performe or accōplish any thing: and if they presume, it prospereth not, and is but labor lost. For where the commaundement commeth, yther by man or by Aungell: and also where freewell is mooued, prouo∣ked and enformed either by the motion of man or of Aun∣gell, yet vnlesse Gods grace go withal preuenting and fo∣lowing the same what is it able to do? For whē man was put in Paradise, what auayled him the commaundement which he heard: Thou shalt eate of euery tree of Paradise, but onely of the tree of knowledge of good and euill, thou shalt not eate.* 3.59 Which commaundement wrought not to his saluati∣on but to his condemnation. And why? because grace that saueth and helpeth,* 3.60 was wanting, whiche he presuming vniustly vpon his owne strength despised. Or what did the commaundement of the law geuen by Moyses, profite the people of Israel in the wildernesse, which law they re∣fused to obey? Or what profite wrought it to hym whych presumed to folow the Lord of his owne free will and not of the Lordes calling, saying vnto him: Lord I wil folow thee whether soeuer thou goest. By these and many other pla∣ces of holy Scripture both of the olde and newe Testa∣ment,* 3.61 it may be prooued that neyther the commaunde∣ment nor free will haue power to woorke of themselues, vnlesse they be holpen by Gods grace preuenting and fo∣lowing them.

* 3.62Seing therfore the gift of continency, as all other gifts be, is the gifte onely of Gods grace, and commeth not by the commaundement nor by free will: they erre therfore & striue in vayne which labour to obteyne it by theyr owne power. And much more they also do erre, whiche by force constrayne men agaynst their will thereunto, mouing thē to offer giftes into the sanctuary of God, not of theyr own accord but by coactiō, either not knowing or els not remē∣bring the saying of the Lord to Moyses: Seperate amon∣gest you the first fruites vnto the Lord, and let euery man of his owne voluntary and willing minde,* 3.63 come and offer the same vnto the Lord. What is this, to separate with you the first fruites to the Lord, but onely to wey and consider diligently in your hartes, and with discretion to lay down and separate vnto the Lord, what we ought to present vn∣to him out of the treasure of our hart? For if thou offer rightly & doest not rightly deuide, thou sinnest. And what is to offer with a willing and ready minde,* 3.64 but as the psal¦mist, sayth: I will offer sacrifice vnto thee willingly and chearefully: And the Apostle sayeth: Not grudgingly or of necessity: for God loueth a chearefull geuer. And Salomon sayth: Geue the Lord his glory with a good and free hart, and in euery gift thou geuest,* 3.65 shew a ioyfull countenaunce, and sancti∣fy thy tythes with gladnes: and with a chearefull eye do all that thou takest in hand. And the Apostle Iames sayth: The Lord loueth not constrayned seruice. And cursed be he that doth the worke of the Lord negligently, that is, not carefully and with a willing minde.* 3.66

Wherfore, as the Lord willeth vs not to offer any thing to him agaynst our willes: so doth he forbid vs to compell any man to offer any thing agaynst their wils by the fore∣sayd Moyses where he sayth: Thou shalt not do thy neigh¦bour wrong, neither oppresse him with violence. To do wrong to thy neighbour, is to correcte him for his sinne not of any compassion or mercy towardes him, but to re, proue him and to cause him in disdayning, vpbrayding,* 3.67 〈◊〉〈◊〉 rebuking him: not to informe him in the spirite of lenity: but to destroy him in the spirit of bitternes and rigour, as the Apostle sayth: If a man be taken in any fault,* 3.68 you that are spirituall informe such in the spirite of lenity, conside∣ring thy selfe least thou also be tempted.

To oppresse our neighbor with violence, is to exact a∣ny thing of him aboue his power, & to lay vpon him more then he is able to beare, an more peraduenture then they thēselues are able to weeld, which lay it vpon him. Where as the Lord speaking of the Pharises to his disciples,* 3.69 for∣biddeth them the same, saying: The Scribes and Pharises doe sitte vpon the chayre of Moyses. &c. And the Apostle Peter: Feed (sayth he) as much as in you lyeth, the Lordes flocke, proui∣ding for them, not by constraint, but willingly after a godly sort, and not for filthy lucre, but of a ready a minde: not as though ye were Lordes ouer the Clergy, but be you as an example to the flocke of good will.

This shepheard of shepheardes and Prince of the A∣postles doth playnely and euidently declare and insinuate what all other Pastors and Apostles ought to do: how to entreat the flocke of the Lord committed vnto them,* 3.70 and what great care and compassion of minde they ought to haue towards theyr Cure: and remoueth farre out of their harts all power of Tyrannicall Lordship and all ambitiō, which some do exercise with gredynes vpon those that are committed to their charge, and pronoūceth that they ought not to be Lordes, but fathers ouer their flocke: and not im∣periously to commaūd them, as exercising stately authori∣ty and power vpon them, but gētly to admonish them and beseech them in the zeale of piety, according to the strength of euery person, after the Lord, and not after the affection of theyr owne will, or ambiciously setting forth theyr own power and iurisdictiō, and that they ought to be an exam∣ple to the flocke, doing first themselues that thing, whiche they commaund others, and so to teach them no lesse by ex∣amples then by words. Willingly (saith he) and not by cō∣straynt: of charity, & not for gredy gayne. For there be ma∣ny which being inflamed with affection, not of charity, but of couetous gredines and ambition, commaūd others that which they are not able to accomplish,* 3.71 and while they pre∣tend to seeke the gayne of soules, they hunt and seek rather for worldly lucre. Which Baalam the Prophet did well ex∣presse: who conuerted the gift of prophecy, and the grace of blessing which he had receiued of God, not to the profite of others, but to his owne commodity.

And some there be, which whiles they correct others, they pretēd to do it with the zeale of God: and whiles they would seeme to be better then other, this they doe with a certayne presumption & rashnes, and so fall in their owne presumption and temerity.* 3.72 Of whome the Apostle spea∣keth: Which haue a zeale of God, but not according to know∣ledge To haue a zeale of God, according to knowledge, is to do any thing in Gods matters prudently and circum∣spectly. Of whom Oza beareth a type and resemblaunce: Who whiles that he went about with his hand to stay the Arke of the Lord staggering a litle by reason of the kicking of the Oxen which caried it, fell downe therfore dead.* 3.73 The Arke of the Lorde to stagger or miscarye by the kickyng of the Oxen, signifieth the law of the Lord (which the prie∣stes themselues ought to beare and hold vp) to be contra∣ried of them in not obseruing the same,* 3.74 & to be turned out of the right course to the contrary part, which Oza, who is interpreted to be a helper of god, attempteth to hold vp. For there be certayne Prelates, which while they see the order of priesthood by some enormity or excesse, to strayne the law of God neuer so litle out of the right course, and la¦bor to redresse and rectify that misorder, rather by vayne ostentation of theyr owne strength, then for any pure zeale to God, while they thus presume inordinately to do, thin∣king to seme to be the helpers of God, many times do mor¦tally fall, and incurre therby great daunger and perill.

Some other also there be whiche hauing before theyr eies no consideratiō of mans infirmity neither being tou∣ched with any respect of mercy and compassion, nor know¦ing how to say with the Apostle: Who is infirme and I am not infirme? these whiles they compare themselues to suche as be vnder theyr charge, not in condition wherein they are equall, but in authority wherin they are superiours, & couet to be theyr maysters, & more to rule ouer them then to profite them, they oppresse the weakenesse of thē by force and violence of authority, and compell them to theyr obe∣dience: which is rightly figured by the fact, which is reade in ye Gospell of Symon Cyrenaeus,* 3.75 whom the persecutours

Page 1160

of the Lord constrayned to take vp the Crosse of Christ. Whose name also doth fitly agree wt ye same figure. For Si∣mon by interpretation is called obedient. Symon then, that is to say, the obedient man is forced to beare ye Crosse of the Lord, when as subiectes being constrayned of theyr maysters by the rigour either of Lordship, or authority, or fere of theyr curse, and so compelled to obey them, are dry∣uen to sustain the Crosse of continency agaynst theyr wils: who neither do loue the Crosse which they beare, because they beare it rather to theyr destruction thē to theyr health: neither by bearing the Crosse, do dye vnto sinne, but by the bearing therof are rather quickned vnto sinne. For ther¦of ryse diuers other more greuous sinnes. For by the inhi∣biting of lawfull and naturall mariage with one woman, riseth the vnnaturall and most execrable Sodomitical for∣nication:* 3.76 riseth also the vnlawfull and damnable defiling of other mens wiues: riseth furthermore cursed and who∣rish filthines and pollution: and moreouer riseth most ab∣hominable incest agaynst all nature, with theyr owne kin∣dred, with a heape of manifolde other filthy ahhominatiōs and lecherous pollutions, whereby the frayle infirmity of man is brought (no doubt) into great perill.

Wherefore Loth being deliuered from the burning of Sodome through the guiding of the Lordes Aungell, and beriued of the felowship of his wife, whiles that he cōside∣ring his owne infirmity durst not ascend vnto the moun∣taine as the Angell badde him, did choose rather to dwel in Segor a litle City nere by, the Aungell thus bidding hym and speaking vnto him:* 3.77 Saue thy soule and looke not behinde thee, but saue thy selfe in the mountayne least thou also perish. To whome Loth aunswered: I pray thee Lord, because thy seruant hath found such grace in thy sight that thou wilt saue me, I can not be saued in the mountayne, least perhappes some euill take me and I dye: There is a litle City hereby whereunto I may flye and may be saued in it.

What meaneth this that Loth flying from Sodome by the commaundement of the Aungell to be saued in ye moū∣tayne, would not ascend vp to the hill fearing there to pe∣rish but did chose rather to dwell in Segor a small Cittye neare vnto the hill,* 3.78 there to be saued, but that euery fayth∣full man coueting to eschue the burning & daunger of So∣domiticall lust, while neither he is able to mount vp to the toppe of virginity, and also is afeard to ascend to the moū∣tayne of the state of widowhood least he perish therein, fly∣eth therfore to the state of matrimony, which is a small cō∣tinēcy in respect of the other two, & also nere vnto thē both. For after those two kindes of continencye,* 3.79 this chastity is also proued to be laudable, & is not depriued of the reward of the kingdome of heauen.

Unto this chastity, he is commaūded to flie which can not otherwise cōteine, & to be saued in it, least peraduēture if he clime vp to the moūt, he fall into inconueniency & pe∣rish therin: that is, least if he shall attempt to obtein by his owne strength the contenencye whyche is not geuen vnto him of God, the euill of incontinency or fornication, or of some of the other euilles afore rehearsed, do fall vpon him, and so he perish in them mortally. For there be many who while they consider not their owne infirmity, & while they striue to atchiue greater thinges thē they are able to reach in this theyr climing do fall headlong into worse inconue∣nience, and while they foolishly seeke for great thinges, doe lose the lesse, which before they seemed to haue. Whych we may well vnderstand by the example of Loth aforesayde: Who what time he left the small Cittye Segor, which he chose before to inhabite, in the which he sought to be sa∣ued: went vp to the mountayne and there abyding fell in∣to the stolne incest of his owne daughters, as the scripture witnesseth, saying: Loth went vp from Segor and remayned in the mountayne, and his daughters gaue to theyr father wine to drinke that night. And the elder of them went and lay with her father. Which thing had not happened vnto him, if he had kept himselfe still in Segor, where be might haue bene sa∣ued at the bidding of the Aungell, as he himselfe required. But because he forsooke that, which was graunted to hym of the Aungell, and presumed to that vpon his owne will; contrary to the precept of the Angel, which was not graū∣ted:: therfore he fell into great daunger of his soule & com∣mitted the greuous sinne of incest.

No otherwise doth it happē to many other, who while either they forsake ye thing which is graunted thē of God, or ambitiously clime after that which is to thē not graun∣ted,* 3.80 both they lose that which they had graunted vnto thē, and fall into that which to them was not graunted. For diuers there be which while they forsake eyther willyng∣ly or agaynst theyr will, the maryed life which is to them lawfully permitted, and in which they might be saued, and striue with a presūptuous desire to lead a single life, both they lose that health and safety, whych they might haue had in one, and incurre great daunger in the other: so that whereby they suppose most to gayne, by the same they lose & fall into the pit of greater ruine. Which thing S Paule ye Doctor of the Gentiles well considering, and tenderly pro¦uiding for the infirmity of the weake Corinthiās writing to him for counsell touching this matter, did write to thē agayne in this wise, saying: As concerning the thinges wher∣of ye wrote vnto me, as it is good for a man not to touch a womā.* 3.81 Neuerthelesse to auoyd whoredome, let euery man haue his wife and let euery woman haue her husband. Let the husband geue vnto his wife due beneuolēce: likewise also the wife vnto her hus∣band. And a litle after: withdraw not (sayth he) your selues one from an other, except it be with consent for a time, that you may geue your selues vnto fasting and praier: and afterward come to∣gether agayne le to Sathan tempte you for your incontinencye.* 3.82 For as the Poe sayth, we can not all do all thinges, and as the Apostle sayth: It is not in him that willeth not in him that runneth, but in God that sheweth mercy. Also an other place: For to euery one of vs is geuen grace according to the measure of the gift of Christ.* 3.83 And that euery one of vs ought to keepe and not to transgresse this measure, he teacheth a∣none after saying: I wish that all men were as I my selfe am but euery man hath his proper gift of God, one after this maner, an other after that.* 3.84

And that we are to be kept within our compasse, and measure, and ought therewith to be content, hee teacheth moreouer as followeth: Let euery man abide in that vocation wherein he is called, And shortly after, for confirmatiō ther∣of, hee repeteth the same agayne and sayth: Let euery man wherein he is called, therein abide with the Lord And because he perceaued that the infirmitie of man was not able to susteine the burning motiōs and heates of nature styrring in a man, but onely by the grace of God, neither to be able to conquere the fleshe fighting agaynst the spirite, accor∣ding to that whiche he sayth of himselfe in an other place: For I see an other Lawe in my members rebelling agaynst the Lawe of my minde, he therefore of mercy and compassion, as condescending vnto their weakenes: and not by rigour of law and force of commaundement, thus sayde. As also in an other place in his Epistles he speaketh in like woordes saying: I speake thus grosly after the maner of men, because of the infirmitie of your flesh. And in this foresaid Epistle,* 3.85 more∣ouer a litle before, vsing the same maner of speach, he saith, Thus I say to you as of fauour and not of commaundement. And adding moreouer, he sheweth: As touching virgines I haue no commaundement of the Lord,* 3.86 but onely do geue coun∣sell, as one that haue found mercy with God, that I shoulde be faythfull. That is, after the same mercy wherwith the Lord hath informed and instructed me when he called me to the fayth, and made me faythfull to hym: so I likewyse doe geue counsell to other and shewe the same mercy to them.

And for asmuch as both are good: to witte to haue a wife or not to haue: to haue a husband or not to haue: nei∣ther is there anye sinne in hauing wife or husband: shortly after he inferreth saying: I suppose therefore this to be good for the present necessitie: I meane, that it is good for a man so to be: What meaneth this, for present necessitie? What is this necessitie present, but present infirmitie? or els instant necessitie, compelling to doe, as ye order of necessitie requi∣reth. Or els he meaneth by this present necessitie,* 3.87 the di∣stresse of that time which then was instant, and compelled him to write, and so to beare with them which was for the auoyding of the fornicatiō amongst them, and many other kinds of filthines aboue touched which might haue happe¦ned. For the which fornication he tooke occasion to write vnto the Corinthians and to answere to theyr letters: and therfore he vehemently agaynst the sayd Corinthians in ye former part of the sayd Epistle vttereth these words: What will you shall I come to you with a rod? or in loue and in the spi∣rite of meekenes? There is heard among you to be fornication,* 3.88 & such fornication as is not named among the Gentiles, that one should haue his own fathers wife. &c. And therfore for this ne∣cessity of auoyding such fornication, he saith: It is good for a man so to be: that he which cannot cōteine,* 3.89 should mary & take a wife. which afterward he expoūdeth thus inferring: art thou boūd to a wife? seek not to be losed. And if thou be losed frō a wife seek not a wife. But if thou takest a wife thou sinnest not, and if a virgine mary, she sinneth not. &c. And that he spake not thys by way of commaunding, but of sufferance and compassi∣on, he sheweth plainly in these words folowing: But I spare you: that is to say, I beare with your infirmity: & therefore he leaueth it in the free power and will of euery man, to chuse what he best liketh, Neither doth he inforce any man (he sayth) violently, nor charge them with any strait com∣maundement, and therfore addeth these words folowing: And this I speake for your owne commodity, not to tangle you as in a snare, but for that it is good and honest for you, that you

Page 1161

may serue the Lord without separation.

This he sayth to them whom before he exhorted to cō∣tinency, and whom he woulde not to be let or troubled by matrimoniall coniunction. But to other he sayth thus: If a∣ny man thinke that it is vncomely for his virgin to remayne ouer long vnmaried, and if neede so require, let him doe what he thin∣keth good, he sinneth not: let them mary: And agayne both be good, he saith, but yet the one to be better he concludeth say∣ing: Therefore he that ioyneth in Matrimony, his virgin doth wel, but he that doth not doth better. Which agreeth wel with the text aboue, speaking of both kindes, as well the man as the woman, where he sayth: If thou take a wife thou sinnest not, and if the virgin take a husband she sinneth not.

If therfore it be no sinne for the man to take a wife, nor for the virgine to take a husband, after the apostles mynd, neither doth diminish theyr felicity, but rather encrease it, & for as much as both do well, & so both be blessed: we then which take wiues for our infirmity, what doe we sinne in hauing them? Or if the apostle do suffer & permit to euery man for the auoyding of fornication to haue his wife, we then which come of the same lumpe or masse & taking our sinnefull flesh of the sinnefull flesh of Adam, are not able o∣therwise to conteine, why are we not permitted for ye same cause & by the same permissiō, to haue likewise our wiues, but are enforced to forsake them being maryed?

Wherfore either do you permit vs, folowing the apo∣stle, to haue our wiues, or els teach vs that we come not of the same masse,* 3.90 either els shew vs that the same sufferaūce & permission is not graūted to vs by the Apostle which is graunted to other. Which cause peraduēture you wil thus pretend: that this sufferance was graunted of the Apostle, not to the clergy or to any of our order, but only to lay mē. Which cannot well be defended neyther by the wordes of the Apostle, nor by any circumstaunce of his Epistle for as much as there is no certayne distinction or denomination either of persōs or degrees, or professions there mētioned, neither doth he make any difference either in names or offi¦ces of men, either of them which wrote vnto him either of those persons of whom he wrote, or els of those to whō he answereth, but onely in general to the whole church of the Corinthians, as he himself in the beginning of his Epistle purporteth in these wordes: Paule called the Apostle of Iesus Christ,* 3.91 by the will of God & Sosthenes his brother to the church which is at Corinth, such as be sanctified in Christ Iesus, called sayntes, with all that inuocate the name of the Lord. &c. [And af∣ter a few other wordes, which here for breuityes sake we omit, as not being greatly to the purpose pertinent: thus he inferreth:] These premisses being then wel considered, we besech you to haue regard & compassiō of our infirmity, most humbly desiring you, not to oppresse vs with this violence. For as we haue sufficiently before proued, no man ought to be cō∣strayned vnto continency agaynst his wil, neither is thys kind of vertue commaunded of God to any man, of neces∣sity,* 3.92 but onely of voluntary deuotion to be offred vnto the Lord: as he himselfe speaketh in the Gospell: All men can not receiue this saying, but to whom it is geuen. Whereunto he gently exhorteth them that can take it, saying: He that is a∣ble to receiue this, let him receiue it. &c.

Wherefore for distinctions sake Moyses is not him∣selfe commaūded to cloth Aaron and his sonnes with bree∣ches as in these wordes going before:* 3.93 Thou shalt cloth with these Aaron thy brother, and his sonnes with him. &c. But he thus sayth: Thou shalt make linnen breches that they thēselues may couer the filth of theyr flesh. That they themselues (sayth he) may couer the filth of theyr flesh. Thou (sayth he) shalt make the breches for the bishop and his sonnes: thou shalt teach the rule of chastity: thou shalt exhort them to absteine from the company of theyr wiues, which shall do the prie∣stes office: Yet laying vpon none violently the sayd yoake of continency, but whosoeuer shalbe priests and shal serue the aulter, shall of their owne accord surcease from the vse of matrimony: which when they shall do, & of theyr owne voluntary consent shall take vpon them the purpose of cō∣tinency to serue the aulter, then shall the grace of God be present, which as it did apparell those other priestes afore∣sayd with attyre for thē conuenient: so shall it instruct these aboundantly how they ought to liue and to teach. And this sence well agreeth with the text that foloweth, saying: And when thou shalt wash the father and his sonnes with water,* 3.94 thou shalt take the garmentes, that is, the strayt coat, the tunicle & the brestlappe, and put them vpon Aaron, & gird them to him with a brodered girdle of the Ephod. Then thou shalt put the myter vp∣on his head, and shalt put the holy crowne vpon the miter, and thus shall he be consecrated. Also thou shalt bring his sonnes and put coates vpon them, and shalt gird them with girdles, both Aa∣ron & his sonnes, and shalt put bonettes on them, and the Prie∣stes office shalbe theirs for a perpetuall law.

Thus then you see a commaundement of receiuing the linnen breches of Moyses. Wherby it playnely appeareth,* 3.95 that Aaron and his sonnes, first did apparrell themselues with this kind of apparell, and so entred in to be washed, inducted, annointed & cōsecrated by the hands of Moyses.

By the which we are playnely taught, that the yoke of continency is not to be inforced vpon any man against his will, but is to be receiued of God with a prōpt & a deuout will. Which thing also Dyonisius Areopagita that godly wise man, the Disciple of S. Paule and ordeined of hym B. of Athenes, in a certayne Epistle of his sent to Pymtus B. of the Gnasians, in which he toucheth many things of ma∣riage and chastity (as is in ye Ecclesiastical history rehear∣sed) doth admonish the sayd Pymtus, and prayth him that he will lay no grieuous burthens vpon the neckes of the Disciples, neither inferre any necessity of compelled chasti∣ty vpon the brethren, whereby the infirmity of some of thē might be in daunger.* 3.96 And Pymtus answering to Dyoni∣sius agayn, sheweth himself willing to embrace the sentēce of his wholesome coūcell. The same also did Paphnutius, the diuine & chaste bishop, who in ye coūcell of Nice (as the Tripertite history doth shew vs) when the fathers, which there were present went about to restrayne Priestes from mariage: he rising vp amongst thē & moued with the zeale of mans infirmity, desired thē that they would not so doe, but rather to leaue it vnto the voluntary discretiō of euery man, least in so doing they might peraduenture geue occa∣sion of adultery and fornicatiō. For those holy men did thē vse this cautele and moderation in religion, that whē they treated any thing concerning instructiō and edification of the people,* 3.97 and would haue them styrred vp to a better life by godly instructions, they would rather perswade things to be obserued with patience and lenity, then commaund with rigour and authority: neither would they compell a∣ny man to theyr obedience agaynst his will.

Whose examples you also folowing, which succeede in their rowme and name, do you not lay vpō vs infirme per¦sons, such importable burthēs, lest you be partakers with the Pharisyes and lawyers of the Lords curse: Who saith:* 3.98 Woe to you lawyers which lay burthens vpon men, which they can not beare,* 3.99 and you your selues touch not the burdens wyth one finger. And least the cry of the children of Israel ascend vp to the Lord for the cruell dealing of them which are o∣uerseers of the workes:* 3.100 Neither do you make such Eunu∣ches which are so borne from theyr mothers wombe, or such Eunuches which are violently made by men, but ra∣ther those Eunuches which of theyr owne accord haue gel∣ded themselues for the kingdome of heauē.* 3.101 Neither do you bring vpon the holy order of Gods ministers for vs only, such an offence and sclaunder, that for our wicked life you make the ministery to be despised of others, while you wil not suffer them either to heare vs, or to receiue the sacra∣mentes of vs, infaming therby our lend life, & causing the sauor of vs to stinke before Pharao, & his seruants. Wher∣in it semeth to vs that you deale not soundly & vprightly, if a man may so say (I pray you take it in good worth,* 3.102 that I speak) & also to be agaynst ye authority of Gods word, & the canonicall constitutions which you doe: where as the Lord sayth by Moses the lawgeuer: the shame of thy mo∣ther thou shalr not disclose, & her ignominy thou shalt not dis∣couer. Our mother is ye church: ye sonnes of this mother be all the faythfull,* 3.103 which name yet most fitly is appropriate vnto priestes: for they do beget ye faythfull, both by ye word of preaching & sacramēt of baptisme. Was not he to be coū∣ted a right mother: who sayd, my litle children of whom I tra∣uell in byrth agayne? The shame & ignominy of our mother, what is it but the reproueable conuersation of the life of priests which shame & ignominy is thē reueiled,* 3.104 whē ye life of priests is publickly infamed. Which thing you do, ye dis∣couer & notify vnto men our fragility, lying before as hyd & couered, because before it was not known & for the same you bring ye holy ministery & misteries of god into cōtēpt & hatred: as though the polluted life of other did any thing prtaine thereto to pullute the same, & as though our vn∣cleannes did any thing blemish thē, or diminish the pure∣nes therof, where as the Psalmist sayth:* 3.105 The law of the Lord is pure and immaculate: Or as though they were any whitte polluted by our infection, which do receiue the sayd miste∣ries either by our mouth, or by our ministery. Which if you graunt to be so, then the Lord would neuer haue spokē so to his disciples & the people, touching the Phariseis, say∣ing: Whatsoeuer they bid you obserue, that obserue and do.

And agayne, if it were so, the Lord would not haue sēt forth Iudas, whom he knew should betray him,* 3.106 with the other Disciples to preach, neither would haue committed to him the power of working myracles, & of geuing health nor admitted him to the Communion of the Supper. And if our impurity shuld infect our holy misteries or ministra∣tions, and make them worse that heare and receaue the

Page 1162

same then the Lord would neuer haue touched the Leper whom he had healed, neither woulde he haue kissed hym, neyther would haue eaten with Symon an other Leper, neyther would haue suffered his feet to be kissed, and with the teares to be washed, and with the heare to be dryed, & his head to be annoynted of Mary the sinner.

Therfore the holy Canons haue thus decreed, that no man which rightly receiueth the Lordes Sacramentes of an heretique, shoulde be therefore any thing corrupted by his hereticall pranity, nor the sayd Sacramentes shoulde be any whitte distayned by the infection of him. Whereup∣on the Church of Rome in a certayne Epistle directed vn∣to Anastasius the Emperour, by Anastasius the Pope, did so ordeine and write, that none of all them whom Acatius did baptise, or whom he ordeined Canonically to be prie∣stes or Leuites, shoulde be any thing hurt by the name of the sayd Acatius: so that thereby the Sacramentes which by him were ministred, should seme the lesse firme and ef∣fectuall. For the sacrament of Baptisme also being mini∣stred of an adulterer or a thiefe (which God forefend to be in the Church) doth come vnto the receiuer neuer a whit the worse. What meant that voyce which sounded by the Doue, but that it excluded all euill and impurity of the cor∣ruption of man?* 3.107 in the which it is declared and sayde: This is he which baptiseth. &c. For if the beames of this visible Sunne passing by the filthy places, receiue no spot of fil∣thinesse thereby, much more the grace of him which made this visible Sunne, is not tyed to any worthinesse of our workes. What soeuer therfore any minister of the Church worketh in his functiō to the behoofe of the people, all that taketh his effecte by the operation of God. Thus witnes∣seth Paule by whom Christ speaketh: I haue planted, and A∣pollo hath watered, but it is the Lord that hath geuē the encrease. God regardeth not so much, who or what maner of person doth preach, but that he so preach, that he may confirme thē that be nought, and cause them to preache well of Christ. For such is the operation of Gods mighty grace,* 3.108 that by euill men he winneth good men, and by reprobate and wic¦ked persons he getteth and gathereth together those that be good.

By these and such other reasons and authorities aboue alledged, you ought to be perswaded, neyther to abandon vs that be marryed, from the administration of diuine ser∣uice, nor yet to excommunicate such, to whom the matter nothing perteineth, from the communion thereof. And if we be euill, we are euill to our selues, and hurt our selues more then others. And such as you suppose peraduenture to be vitious, yet may haue some good thing inwardly whi¦che you know not of.

For many there be whom you iudge to be incontinent, which liue more chastly then they whom you so greatly ex∣toll for their continency.* 3.109 We that haue wiues, according to the Apostles minde, so haue them as though we had them not. Which gift of continency for as much as you can not geue vs, pray therfore with vs and for vs, that he wil geue it vnto vs, who only is the giuer therof, & without whom no man is able to liue continently. For otherwise we can not haue it, vules we pray vnto him frō the bottom of our hartes, who is knowne to be the author and geuer therof. And this same (sayth Salomon) is wisedome,* 3.110 to know whose gift it is: neither is there any gift aboue this.

These two Epistles written to Pope Nicolas vnder the title of Uolusianus, geueth vs to vnderstande by the contentes thereof, first that he himselfe was then a marry∣ed Bishop.

Secondly, that the liberty of Priestes marriage ought not to be restrayned by any generall Law, of compulsion: but to be left to euery mans free choyse and voluntary de∣uotion.

Thirdly the sayd Epistles being written to Pope Ni∣colas (if the title be true) declare, that this law prohibiting the lawfull matrimony of Churchmen, began first in thys Popes times generally to be enacted.

And although it be not here expressed, which Pope Nicolas this was, yet by the circumstaunce of time, and especially by the wordes of Pope Alexander 1. Distinct. 32. Praeter,* 3.111 it may probably be esteemed to be Nicolas. 2. and not Nicolas the first, as some do suppose amongst whom is Illyricus in Centur. 9. cap. 10. and also Iohn Bale, De Scriptoribus Cent. 2. with certayne other: from whose iud∣gementes although I am loth to dissent, yet notwithstan∣ding modestly and freely to vtter herein my opinion, thys I suppose, that if the trueth of this matter were throughly tryed, it might peraduenture be found, that they be herein deceiued, and al by mistaking a certayne place of Gracian. For the better explanation wherof, here is to be vnderstā∣ded, that amongest the distinctions of Gracian there is a constitution, Dist. 32. Nullus, the tenour whereof is thi•••• Nullus Missam audiat Praesbiteri, quem scit Concubinam iud∣bitanter habere, aut subintroductam mulierem. &c. That is: That no man shall heare masse of any Priest, whome he knoweth vndoubtedly to haue a Concubine, or a woman priuily resorting to him. &c.

This Decree for as muche as Gracian doeth alledge vnder the name and title of Pope Nicolas, not namynge what Nicolas he was, therefore Iohn Bale and Illyri∣cus, one folowing the other, and they both folowing Uo∣laterane Lib. 22. doth vouch this constitution vpon Nico∣las the first. The wordes of Uolateran be these, writing of Nicolas the first: Multa hic vtilia constituit, inter quae, nequis Concubinam habenti praesbitero aut sacrificanti interesset, vt te∣statur Gracianus. &c.

In like effect folow also the wordes of Illyricus afore sayd: Decretum fecit,* 3.112 ne quis à Sacerdote Sacramentum suci∣piat, quem sciret habere Concubinam, seu vxorem, and al∣ledgeth, as Uolaterane doth, the sayd Distinction of Gratiam Distinct. 32. Nullus. In alleadging whereof both they seme to be deceiued, mistaking belike one Nicolas for an other, as may be proued, & made good by three or foure reasons.

First, by the wordes of Pope Alexander the second, in the next Chapiter folowing,* 3.113 who being the successour of Leo and Nicolas the second, vseth the same wordes in his Sinode of Mantua (which Gracian referreth vnto Nico∣las, and prosecuteth the same more amply and fully alled∣ging moreouer the former constitution of both his prede∣cessours Pope Leo and Nicolas: whiche by all storyes are knowne to be Leo the nynth and Nicolas the second, which both were next before him. The wordes of Alexan∣der. 2. be these: Praeter hoc autem praecipiendo mandamus, vt nullus Missam audiat praesbiteri quem scit Concubinam habere indubitanter, vel subintroductam mulierem, vnde etiam sancta Synodus hoc capitulum sub excommunicatione statuit, dicens▪ Quicunque Sacerdotum, diaconorum, Subdiaconorum, post cō∣stitutum beatae memoriae praedecessoris nostri sancti Leonis Pa∣pae & Nicolai, de castitate Clericorum, Concubinam palam du∣erit, vel ductam non reliquerit. &c. By the which words spea∣king of Nicolas his predecessor it is euident to vnderstand this to be Pope Nicolas the second, which was his next predecessor and not Pope Nicolas the first, who was a∣bout 200. yeares before him.

The second reason, I take out of the next Chapter of Gracian going before,* 3.114 where he allegeth agayne the same Nicolas writing to Otho Archbishop. Which Otho was then in the time of this Nicolas the second Archbishop of Colen, and was afterward in the Counsell of Mantua, vnder Pope Alexander 2. teste Ioan. Quintio, Iure consulto,* 3.115 Wherby it must needes be graunted, that this was Nico∣las the second, and not the first.

The third coniecture or reason is this, for that Pope Nicolas the first neuer made any such Act or Decree, the Priestes that were entangled with a Concubine, shoulde neither sing Masse, nor that any should resort to heare the Masse of such. &c. but rather the contrary.* 3.116 For so we reade in the history of Antoninus, and in the Decrees 15. q. 8. Sci∣scitantibus. Sciscitantibus vobis si à sacerdote quifuerit compre∣hēsus in adulterio, siue de hoc sola fama resperserit, debeatis Cō∣munionem suscipere, nec ne, respondemus:* 3.117 Non potest aliquis quantumcunque pollutus sit, sacramenta diuina polluere, quae Purgatoria cunctarum contagionum existunt. &c.

And yet more playnely also afterward he sayth: Consu∣lendum decernitis vtrum praesbiterum habentem vxorem debe∣atis sustentare & honorare, an à vobis preijcere? In quo respon∣demus, quoniam licet ipsi valdè sint reprehensibiles,* 3.118 vos tamen conuenit Deum imitari, qui solem suum oriri facit super bonos & malos: deijcere enim à vobis eos non debetis. Distinct. 18. Consulendum. &c. That is:* 3.119 Where ye demaund concerning the Priest that hath a wife, whether ye ought to susteine him, and ho∣nour him, or reiecte him from you, we aunswere, That albeit they be very much blame worthy, yet ye ought to be folowers of God, which maketh his sunne to rise both vpon the good, and vpon the badde. And therefore ye ought not to reiect such away from you. &c.

And this Nicolas, Antoninus confesseth playnely to be Nicolas ye first. Wherby it is not onely not vnlike,* 3.120 but also most certayne that Nicolas the first was not the fa∣ther of this constitution, either to exterminate marryed priestes from theyr churches, or to excommunicate the peo∣ple from receiuing their Communion, much lesse then frō hearing theyr seruice.

Fourthly, for as muche then as it is vndoubted that Nicolas 2. and Alexander 2. through the intrigation of wicked Hildebrand, were the authors of that constituti∣on, whereof Gracian speaketh, it remaineth playne by the wordes of Uolusianus, in the latter end of his Letter,

Page 1063

(wherin he maketh mention both of discharging the priest from singyng Masse, & the people from hearing) that the saide Epistle was written, not to Pope Nicolas the first but to the secōd, for because both these were decreed against maried priestes vnder Nicolas. 2. and Alexander. 2. as is afore declared.

And further, least my iudgement herein should seeme to stand alone and singular, without some to take my part, I will here produce for me a Parisian Doctour,* 3.121 and a fa∣mous Lawyer, Ioannes Quintius aboue mentioned, who in his booke De Clericorum moribus, plainely accordeth wth mine opinion, touching this Nicolas authour of the Decree aforesaide, where he writeth in these wordes: Ni∣colaus Papa Othoni Coloniensi Archiepisc. &c. Quinque fue∣runt hoc nomine pontifices Primum, secundumúe oportuit esse, qui haec rescripserit, ille Romanus, anno. 860. hic Burgundus, ann. 1059. Reliquos Ninolaos antecessit Gratianus, qui scripsit haec, anno. 1150 Posteriorem fuisse credo, qui in Panomiae lib. 3. Tit. de lapsis, nominatur Nicholaus iunior, cuius est & aliud De∣cretum sequens.* 3.122 &c. That is to say in English: Pope Nico∣las writing to Otho Archebishop of Colen. Glos. There haue bene in all, fiue Popes called by this name of Nicolas. Of the whiche fiue, this Nicolas the writer hereof muste bee eyther the first, or seconde: the one a Romane, anno. 860. the other a Burgundian, ann. 1059 or. 1060. the other Nicolas liued after Gratian, who wrote in the yeare. 1150. In my iudgement I sup∣pose this to be Nicholas the seconde, which in the thirde booke of the Lawes called Pannomiae. Tit. de lapsis, is named Nico∣las the younger. Which Nicholas also is authour of the next De∣cree that followeth. &c.

Wherfore if any man shal obiecte hereafter, that because Gratian in the Distinction aforesayde, nameth Pope Ni∣colas absolutely without any additiōs,* 3.123 it is therfore to be taken for Nicolas the first: vnto this obiection I set here these two Lawiers to answeare. Unto whose aunsweare this I adde also, that the common manner of Gracian lightly in all his Distinctions is, that when he speaketh of Popes, as of Innocentius, Gregorius, Leo, Lucius, and suche other, verye seldome he expresseth the difference of their names. So in the Dist. 18. Praesbyteris, where he brin∣geth in the Decree of Pope Calixtus in like maner against the Matrimonie of Priestes, Deacons, and Subdeacons, he addeth therto no discrepance of his name: and yet al the world knoweth, that this was Calixtus the second, & not the first, &c. But whether he were or no, the matter forceth not much. The letters (no doubt) by their title appeare to be written by Uolusianus. Most certaine this is, by whō so euer they were written, fruitfull Epistles they are, and effectual to the purpose.

But least wee shall seeme too muche to digresse from our purpose, let vs returne to the story & time of Nicolas ye second againe, which was about the yeare, as is said. 1060. a litle before Hildebrand was Pope. Which Hildebrande, albeit he was then but a Cardinal, yet was he the whole doer of all thinges,* 3.124 and concluded what him listed in the Church of Rome, and also made Popes, whom he would, as appeared both by this Nicolas, & also Pope Alexander which followed him. pag. 174. So that this dissolution of priests mariage began somwhat to kindle vnder this pope Nicolas,* 3.125 through the pestilent meanes of Hildebrand, and after him increased more vnder Pope Alexāder, as appea∣reth by the Synode holden at Millane, an. 1067. but moste of al it burst out vnder the sayd Hildebrand himselfe being Pope, the yeare (as is sayd) 1076.

Although as touching this prohibition of priestes to be maried, I am not ignoraunt, that certaine of the con∣trary faction, in searching out the reache and antiquitie of this tradition, for priestes to abstaine from wiues, doe re∣ferre the same to the time of the seconde Councell of Car∣thage, which was about ye time of Pope Syritius, a great enemy to Ministers wyues, as appeareth Distinct. 84. Cum praeterito.* 3.126 Yet notwithstanding to the same may be aun∣sweared, that this was no vniuersall or generall Councel, but some particular Synode, and therfore of no such great forceable authoritie.

2 Secondly, the same Synode being about the time of Pope Syritius, who was a capitall enemy against priests marryage:* 3.127 may seeme to draw some corruption of the time then present.

3 Thyrdly, neither is it vnpossible, but as diuers bastard Epistles haue bene falsely fathered vpon certaine auncient Bishoppes of the Primitiue Churche, and di∣uers Canons also (as of the Councell of Nice) haue bene corrupted by Byshoppes of Rome, so some falsehode like∣wise or forgery might be vsed in this seconde Councell of Carthage.

4 Fourthly, although no false conueyance had ben v∣sed therein, yet for so much as the sayd Canon of this secōd Councell of Carthage doth misreport and falsifye the Ca∣nons of the Apostles, in so doing it dooth iustly diminishe his owne credite.

5 Fiftly, seeing the foresayde Canon of this seconde Councel of Carthage tendeth cleane contrary to the Ca∣nons of the Apostles, to the Councel of Gangra, and other Councels moe, and commaundeth that, whiche they doe accurse, the authoritie thereof ought to haue no great force, but rather may be reiected.

6 Finally, though this constitution of the Councell of Carthage, were perfectly sounde, without all corruption,* 3.128 yet plaine and euident it is by this Uolusianus, Byshop also of Carthage, that the same constitution tooke no great holde in the Churche, for so muche as we see, that both this Uolusianus was married after that in Carthage him selfe, and also besides him many hundreth yeares after, Marriage was a common matter through moste Chur∣ches of Christendome, amongest Bishoppes and priests, as partly before hath beene declared. And more maye be seene in hystories, what great tumultes and busines was long after that in Hildebrandes time, and after him also a∣mongest the Clergy men, both in Italie, Spayne, France, and in al quarters of Christendome, for seperating priestes from their libertie of marrying.

And againe, if this tradition concerning the vnmar∣ryed life of Priestes had stand vpon such an olde foundati∣on from the second Councel of Carthage (as they pretend) what needed then in the time of Pope Nicolas. 2. Pope Alexander. 2. Pope Gregory. 7. and other Popes after them, so much labour to be taken, so many Lawes and decrees to be deuised & enacted, for the abolishing o priests marriage, if the same had bene of such a long antiquitie as they would make men beleeue?

By these thinges considered it may appeare, that this distraction of Priests marriage, by publique Lawe com∣pelling them to single life,* 3.129 was nether receiued for a ful law generally to be obserued in the Church of Rome, but only since the beginning of Hildebrand, that is, since these fiue hundred yeares.

Aboute whiche time firste is to be noted, that vnder Pope Leo and this Pope Nicolas, Cranzius, and cer∣tayne Germaine Chronicles doe saye, that Symonie and Priestes Marriage were prohibited. This Pope Leo was. ann. 1051.

After him Pope Nicolas (to whom the foresaid Let∣ter of Uolusianus seemeth to be written) made this ordi∣naunce: Vt nullus missam audiat praesbyteri quem scit concubi nam indubitanter habere aut subintroductam mulierem. Et mox: Quicunque Sacerdotum, Diaconorum, Subdiaconorum, post constitutum beatae memoriae praedecessoris nostris sanctiss. Papae Leonis, de castitate clericorum, concubinam palam dux∣erit, vel ductam non reliqueret,* 3.130 ex parte omnipotentis Dei & authoritate beati Petri & pauli praecipimus, & omninò contra∣dicimus vt Missam non cantet &c. That is, What soeuer priest Deacon, or Subdeacon, according to the constitution of Pope Leo our predecessour, conserning the chastitie of Clerkees, shal openly mary a Concubine, or shal not put her away beyng married in the behalfe of almighty God &c. we vtterly charge and forbid the same, that he sing no Masse, nor read the Gos∣pell or Epistle at Masse, nor execute any diuine seruice. &c. And this was about the yeare of our Lord. 1058.

Although in this constitution of Pope Nicolas, thys word Concubine may be vnderstanded for no wie, but so as Gratian vnderstandeth it in the 16. Canon of the Apo∣stles in these wordes: Concubina verò intelligenda est praeter vxorem: That is, for one besides a mans wyfe.* 3.131 Then after this Pope Nicholas, comming pope Alexander, and spe∣cially Pope Hildebrand,* 3.132 do expound this Concubine for∣bidden, for a wife, and such priestes as be marryed, they ex∣pound them for Nicolaitans: for so we read in the Synode of Millane, vnder Pope Alexander the second:* 3.133 Nicholaitae autem dicuntur Clerici, qui contra castitatis Ecclesiasticae re∣gulam foeminis admiscentur. &c.

And further it followeth in the same Synode: Nicolai∣tarum quoque haeresin nihilominus condemnamus,* 3.134 & non modo praesbyteros, sed & Diaconos & Subdiaconos ab vxorū, vel concubinarum foedo consortio nostris studijs, in quantum nobis possibilitas fuerit, arcendos esse promittimus &c.

And after it followeth in this wise: Si haec de Simoniaca & Nicolaitarum haeresi delenda & funditus destruenda fideli∣ter non obseruauero, ab omnipotenti Deo & omnibus Sanctis sim excommunicatus et anathematizatus, & ab omni Christia∣norum consortio inueniar alienus.

And moreouer it followeth vpon the same: Anathema∣tizo quoque omnes haereses extollentes se aduersus sanctam Catholicam et Apostolicam Ecclesiam,* 3.135 specialiter vero et no∣minatim. Simoniacam haeresin: deindé Nicolaitarum aquè abo∣minabilem haeresin, quae impudēter latrat, sacri altaris Ministros

Page 1164

debere vel posse licenter vti coniugibus, quomodo & laicos, &c. As much to say in English, as, I doe accurse all here∣sies extolling thēselues against the holy catholike and Apostolike church,* 3.136 but especially and namely, the heresie of Simonie: and in like maner, the abominable heresie of the Nicolaitanes, whiche impudently barketh, that the Ministers of the holy aultar may & ought to vse wiues lawfully, as well as lay men, &c. And thus much concerning the Synode of Millain, vnder Pope A∣lexander. 2. ann. 1067.

Nexte after this Alexander, rose vppe Pope Hilde∣brand, of all other, the chiefest and most principal enemy a∣gaynste Priestes Marriage. For whereas all other ap∣proued Canons and Councelles were contented, that any Clergie man hauing a wife before his entring into his mi∣nisterie,* 3.137 might enioy the libertie of his marriage, so that he married not a widowe, or a knowen harlot, or kept a Concubine, or were twise married, nowe commeth in Pope Hildebrande, making Priestes Marriage to be he∣resie, and further enacting: That what soeuer Clerke, Deacon, or Minister had a wife, what so euer she was, (mayde or other) ei∣ther before his orders, or after, should vtterly put her from him, or elles forsake his Ministerie. &c.

Although notwithstanding the greatest parte of Ec∣clesiasticall Ministers seeing this straunge doctrine and proceedinges (whiche Saint Paule expressely calleth the doctrine of Deuilles) did what they coulde to withstande the same.* 3.138 * 3.139 Of whom Lambertus Scafnaburgensis thus writeth: Aduersus hoc Decretum protinus vehementer infre∣muit tota factio Clericorum, hominem planè haereticum, & ve∣sani dogmatis esse clamitans, qui oblitus sermonis Domini, quo ait: Non omnes capiunt hoc Verbum: Qui potest capere, capiat, &c. Et Apostoli: Qui se non continet nubat: Melius est nubere, quàm vri, Violenta exactione homines viuere cogeret ritu An∣gelorum. Quod si pergeret, malle se sacerdotium, quàm coniu∣gium deserere, &c. In English thus: Agaynste this Decree, the whole number of the Cleargie did vehemently storme and grudge, crying out vppon him, as a pernicious heretique, & one that maynteyned phantasticall doctrine: who forgetting what the Lorde sayth:* 3.140 All men can not take this worde: Hee that can take it, let him take it. And also what the Apostle sayeth: Who so can not otherwise conteyne let him marrye, better it is to marry then to burne, &c. Yet notwithstanding woulde bynde men to liue like Aungelles. Who if he continued as he beganne, they woulde (they sayd) sooner forsake the order of Priesthode, then their order of Matrimony, &c.

* 3.141Which Hildebrand, all this notwithstanding, yet cea∣sed not still to call vpon them, and to sende to the Bishops euery where to execute his commaundement with all se∣ueritie, threatning to lay the Apostolicall Censure vppon them, if otherwise they shewed not their diligence there in to the vttermost. Ex Lamb. This was, ann. 1074. Of the same Hildebrande, Radulphus de Diceto also writing hath these wordes:

Gregorius Papa septimus Hildebrandus, celebrata Synodo, Symoniacos* 3.142 anathematizauit, vxoratos sacerdotes à Diuino re∣mouit officio, & Laicis Missam eorum audire interdixit, nouo ex∣exemplo, & (vt multis visum est) inconsiderato praeiudicio, con∣tra sanctorum patrum sententiam, &c. The English is this: Pope Gregorie the seuenth called Hildebrand holding a Synode, accursed, such as committed Simonie, and remooued married Priestes from saying seruice, forbidding also the lay men to heare their Masse, after a new and strange example, & as many thought, after an vnconsiderate preiudice, against the sentence of holie fa∣thers.

And thus much for the antiquitie of bringing in the sin∣gle life of Priests, which first springing from the tyme of Pope Nicholas and Alexander 2. began first with a cu∣stome, and afterward was brought into a lawe, chieflie by Pope Hildebrand, and so spread from Italie into other countries, and at length into England also, albeit not with out much adoe, as ye shall heare, the Lord willing.

In the meane while as Pope Nicolas and Hildebrand were busie at Rome, so Lanfranke Archb. of Canterbury likewise was doing here in England about the same mat∣ter, although he began not altogither so roughlie as Pope Hildebrand did, for so it appeared by his Councell holden at Winchester: where though he inhibited such as were Prebendaries of cathedrall churches to haue wiues, yet did he permit in his Decree,* 3.143 that such Priests as dwelt in townes and villages, hauing wiues, should reteine them still, and not to be compelled to be separate from them: and they which had none, should be inhibited to haue: enioy∣ning moreouer the Bishops thus, to foresee hereafter, that they presumed not to admit into order, any priests or Dea∣cons, vnlesse they should first make a solemne profession to haue no wiues.

The words of the Councell be these: Decretumque est, vt nullus Canonicus vxorem habeat, sacerdotum verò in castellis & in vicis habitantium habentes vxores,* 3.144 non cogantur vt 〈◊〉〈◊〉 non habentes, interdicantur vt habeant: & deinceps caueant E∣piscopi, vt Sacerdotes vel Diaconi non praesumant ordinare, nisi profiteantur vt vxores non habeant, &c.

And here to note by the way of the said Lanfranke, for all his glorious gaye shew of his monkish virginitie and single life, yet he escaped not altogither so vnspotted for his part, but that the storie of Mathew Paris, writing of Paulus Cadonensis,* 3.145 whom Lanfranke preferred so gladly to be Abbot of S. Albons, thus reporteth of him: Paulus (inquit) Monachus Cadonensis Archiepiscopi Lanfranci nepos, iure, ali∣quorum relationibus, consanguinitate propinquior, &c. That is, Paule a Monke of Cadune, and nephew of the Archbishop Lanfranke, yea as some say further, more neere in bloud to him, then so, &c.

Then after Lanfranke, came Anselme into the See of Canterbury, who taking to him a stouter stomacke,* 3.146 more fiercelie and egerlie laboured this matter, in abrogating vtterly the mariage of priests, Deacons, Subdeacons, and of the vniuersall clergy, not permitting as Lanfranke did, Priests that had wiues in villages and townes, to keepe them still, but vtterly commanding, and that vnder great paine, not onelie Priests and Deacons, but Subdeacons also (which is against the Councell of Laterane) which were already maried, to be seperated,* 3.147 and that none should be receiued into order hereafter, without profession of per∣petuall chastitie.

And yet notwithstanding, for all this great blustering and thundering of this Romish 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, the Priests yet still holding their owne, as well as they could, gaue not much place to his vnlawfull Iniunction, but kept stil their wiues almost two hundred yeares after, refusing and resi∣sting of long time, the yoke of that seruile bondage, to kepe still their freedome from such vowing, professing, and pro∣mising, as may well appeare by those Priests of Yorke, of whom Gerardus Archbishop of Yorke speaketh, writing to Anselme in these wordes: Sitio Clericorum meorum inte∣gritatem, sed praeterquam in paucis admodum, ve Aspidis surdita∣tem, vel fabulosi cuiusdam Prothei mutabilitatem inuenio. Varijs linguarum aculeis, minas, modò conuitia infligunt. Sed hoc faci∣lius in his qui remotíores sunt, tolero. Illud omninò graue ge∣nus mali est, quod hi qui quasi in sinu meo sunt, qui Canonicorum nomine gaudent canones aspernant, aduersus concilij nostri sta∣tuta, quasi Sophistici disputatores argumētantur, professiones ve∣rò mihi penitus abnegant Canonici illi, qui sine professione ad sacros ordines inordinabiliter sunt prouecti, & qui in praesby∣teratu vel Diaconatu constituti, vxores siue Concubinas in pub¦lico hactenus habuerunt, ab Altari nulla se reuerentia conti∣nuerunt. Cum verò ad ordines aliquos inuito, dura ceruice nituntur, ne inordinando castitatem profiteantur: In englishe thus: I much desire the puritie of my clergye men. Howbeit except it be in very few, I finde in them the deafenes of the serpent aspis, and the inconstancie of Protheus that the Poets fable spake of. With theyr stinging tongues they cast out some while threates; some while tauntes and rebukes. But this gree∣ueth mee lesse in them that be further off. This greeueth mee most of all, that they whiche be of mine owne Church as in myne owne bosome, and prebendaryes of myne owne See, contemne our Canons, and argue like Sophisticall dispu∣ters, agaynst the statutes of our Councell. The prebendaries which vnordinately haue bene taken into orders heretofore without making vow or profession, refuse vtterly to make pro∣fession to me. And they that be priestes or Deacons, hauing maryed before openly wyues or Concubines, will not be re∣moued for anye reuerence from the Aultare. And when I call vpon any to receaue order, styffely they deny to professe cha∣stitie in theyr ordering &c.

Thus for al their rigorous austeritie by this Anselme in forcing his Decree made at London, agaynst the mar∣riage of Priests, yet the same had no great successe,* 3.148 neither in his life time, nor after his life. For although sondry prie∣stes, during his life tyme, were cōpelled by his extremitie, to renounce theyr wyues, yet many denyed to obey him.

Diuers were contented rather to leaue theyr benefices, then their wiues. A great number were permitted by king Henry, for mony to enioy theyr wiues. Which was so char¦gable vnto them, (sayth Edmer in his 4. booke) that at length two hundreth priestes, in theyr Albes and Priestly vestementes, came barefoote to the kings Pallace, crying to hym for mercy, and especially makyng theyr sute to the Queene, who vsing much compassion towardes them, yet durst not make for them any intercession.

Anselme at this time was ouer the Sea, making his voyage to the pope. Who hearing hereof,* 3.149 writeth to the King, declaring that suche forfaytures appertayned no∣thing to him. But onely vnto Bishops, and in theyr de∣faulte to the Archbishops. Whereof read more, pag. 194. So wilfull was the blinde zeale of this Prelate, agaynst

Page 1165

all reason, against nature it selfe, against the example of his forcelders against publique custome of his owne tyme, a∣gainst the doctrine of the Apostles, the constitution of Councels against all honestie, and all Gods forbode, that he neither at the contemplation of the king, nor at the cry∣ing out and publike dolour of so many priests, nor yet mo∣ued with the letters of Pope Paschalis himself (who put∣tyng him in remembrance of so many priests sonnes,* 3.150 wil∣led him to consider the necessitie of the tyme, pag. 196. would yet nothing relent from his stubborne purpose, vn∣to his latter ende. In whom, as many great crimes may iustly be noted, so of all other, this is most principally in him to be reprehended: for that he seeyng and perceauing what Sodomiticall feditie and abhomination, with other inconueniences, did spring incontinently vpon this his Diabolicall doctrine, yet for all that would not giue ouer his pestilent purpose.

For so the storie recordeth, that when Anselme had e∣stablished his Synodoll constitution,* 3.151 in seperating priests from their wyues (which was, anno. 1103.) not long af∣ter, rumours and complaints were brought to him, of the execrable vice of Sodomitrie, which then beganne spe∣ciallie to raigne in the Clergie, after this inhibition of ma∣trimonie.

Whereupon Anselme was constrained to call an other Councell at Paules within London, to prouide for this mischiefe. In which Councell this Act was made: Sodo∣miticum flagitium facientes, & eos in hac voluntate iuuantes, graui an athemate dānamus, donec poenitentia & confessione ab∣solutionem mereantur, &c. All them that commit the vngraci∣ous sinne of Sodomitrie,* 3.152 and them also which assist them in this their wicked purpose, with greeuous curse we doe condemne, till such tyme as they shall deserue absolution by penaunce and confession, &c.

Thus ye haue heard what abhominable wickednesse ensued after that priests were debarred from mariage, and whatfore punishment was deuised by this maidenly pre∣late, for extirping that sinful wickednes: in the abolishing whereof, more wiselie he should haue remooued away the occasion whereof he was the authour himselfe, then by pe∣naltie to suppresse it, which he could neuer do.

Now let vs heare further, what folowed in that wor∣thy Councell:* 3.153 Qui vero in hoc crimine publicatus fuerit, sta∣tutum est, siquidem fuerit persona religìosi ordinis, vt ad nullum amplius gradum promoueatur, & si quem habet, ab illo depona∣tur. Si autem laicus, vt in toto Regno Angliae legali sua condig∣nitate priuetur. Et ne huius criminis absolutionem, ijs qui se sub regula viuere vouerunt, aliquis nisi Episcopus deinceps facere praesumat Statutum quoque est, vt per totam Angliam in omni∣bus Ecclesijs, & in omnibus diebus Dominicis, excommunica∣tio praefata publicetur ac renouetur, &c. Which is as much to say in English: It is enacted, that whosoeuer shall be publike∣ly knowen to be guiltie hereof,* 3.154 if he be a religious person, he shal from thence forth be promoted to no degree of honour, and that degree which he hath alreadie, shall be taken from him. If he be a lay person, he shall be depriued of all his freedome within the whole realme of England. And that none vnder a bishop shal pre∣sume to assoyle such as haue bene Monkes professed, of that tres∣passe. It is also enacted, that euery sonday in the yeare, and in e∣uery parish church in England, this generall curse aforesayd shall be published and renewed, &c. Ex Rog. Houed. & Epist. An∣selm. 278.

Is not here (trowe you) good diuision of Iustice, that lawfull wedlocke of priests can find no grace nor pardon, yea, is made now heresie: where adulterie & horrible So∣domitrie is washed away with a little confession? And see yet what foloweth more.* 3.155 After that this penall curse shuld now go abroad and be published in churches, the monkes perceiuing this matter to touch them somewhat neare, whispered in Anselmus care, perswading him that ye pub∣lication of that Acte might growe to great danger and in∣conuenience, in opening the vice which before was not knowen:* 3.156 in such sort, that in short tyme after, that curse was called in againe.

And so cursed Sodomitrie & adulterie passed free with∣out punishment,* 3.157 or word spoken against it, where contra∣ry godly matrimonie could find no mercy.

Now what reasons and arguments this Anselme suc∣ked out of the Court of Rome, to prooue the matrimonie of priests vnlawfull, were it not for combring the Reader with tediousnes, here would be shewed. Briefly, the chiefe grounds of all his long disputation,* 3.158 in his booke entitu∣led, Offendiculum Sacerdotum, betweene the maister and scholer, come to this effect.

Argument.

Priests of the old law, during the tyme of their mini∣stration, absteined from their wyues:

Ergo, Priests in the tyme of the Gospel, which euery day minister at the aulter, must neuer haue any wiues.* 3.159

Another Argument.

Moses, when he should sanctifie the people, goyng vp to the hyll, commaunded them to sequester themselues from their wiues three dayes:

Ergo, Priests that must be sanctified to the Lord always ought to liue chaste alwaies without wiues.

Another Argument.

Dauid before he should eat of the shewbread, was asked whether he and his company had bene without the com∣pany of their wyues three dayes:

Ergo, Priests that be continually attending vpon the ta∣ble and sacraments of the Lord, ought neuer to haue com∣pany with any such.

Another Argument.

Oza, which put his hand to the Arke,* 3.160 was slaine there∣fore, as it is thought, because he lay with his wife the night before:

Ergo, Priests whose hands be alwayes occupied about the Lordes seruice, must be pure from company of wife, or any woman.

Another Argument.

Nadab, and Abiud, which sacrificed with strange fire, were deuoured therefore,* 3.161 because they companied with their wiues the same night:

Ergo, Priests and sacrificers must haue no wyues to company with all.

Another Argument.

The priests of the Gentiles, in old tyme when they sa∣crificed to their idoles, are sayd to lye from their wiues:

Ergo, much more the priests that sacrifice to the liuyng God, ought so to do.

Another Argument.

Christ was borne of a Uirgin, Christ liued euer a vir∣gin, and commaundeth them that will serue him,* 3.162 to folow him. Qui mihi ministrat, me sequatur: id est, Si vis mihi mini∣strare, me castè viuendo imitare.

Ergo, Priests that haue wyues are not meete to serue hym.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.