¶The Submission of M. Thomas Bilney.
THe fourth day of Decēber, the bishop of London with the other bishops his assistauntes,* 1.1 assembled againe in the chapter house of Westminster, whether also M. Bilney was brought, and was exhorted & admonished to abiure and recant: who aunswered that he would stand to his cō∣science. Then the Bishop of London with the other By∣shops, Ex officio, did publish the depositions of the witnes∣ses, with his Articles and aunsweres, commaunding that they should be read. That done, the Byshop exhorted hym agayne to deliberate with himselfe, whether he woulde re∣turne to the Church, and renoūce his opinions or no, and badde him to depart into a voyd place, and there to delibe∣rate with himselfe. Which done, the Bishoppe asked him a∣gayne if he would returne. Who aunswered: Fiat iusticia & iudicium in nomine domini,* 1.2 and being diuers times admo∣nished to abiure, he would make no other answere, but Fi∣at iustitia. &c. And haec est dies quam fecit Dominus, exultemus & laetemur in ea. Then the Byshop, after deliberation, put∣ting off his cap, sayd: In nomine patris & filij & spiritus sancti. Amen. Exurgat Deus & dissipentur inimici eius: and making a crosse on his forehead and his brest, by the counsell of the other Bishops, he gaue sentence against M. Bilney, being there present in this maner.
I by the consent and counsell of my brethren here pre∣sent do pronounce thee Thomas Bilney who hast bene ac∣cused of diuers Articles to be conuict of heresy, and for the rest of the sentence, we take deliberation till to morow.
The 5. day of December the Byshops assembled there agayne, before whom Bilney was brought, whom the by∣shop asked if he would returne to the vnity of the Church, and reuoke his heresies which he had preached. Wherunto Bilney aunswered, that he would not be a slaunder to the Gospell,* 1.3 trusting that he was not seperate frō the Churh, and that, if the multitude of witnesses might be credited, he might haue 30. men of honest life on his part, agaynst one to the contrary brought in agaynst him: which wytnesses, the Byshoppe sayd came to late, for after publication, they could not be receiued by the law. Then Bilney alleadging the story of Susan and Daniel, the Bishop of London still exhorted him to returne to the vnity of the Church and to abiure his heresies,* 1.4 and permitted him to goe into some se∣cret place, there to consult with his frendes, till one of the clocke at after noone, of the same day.
At afternoone, the bishop of London agayne asked him whether he would returne to the church and acknowledge his heresies.* 1.5 Bilney aunswered that he trusted he was not seperate from the Church, and required time and place to bring in witnesses, which was refused. Then the Byshop once agayne required of him whether he woulde turne to the Catholicke Church. Whereunto he aunswered,* 1.6 that if they could teach and proue sufficiently that he was cōuict, he would yelde and submit himselfe, and desired agayne to haue time and space to bring in agayne his refused witnes∣ses, and other answere he would geue none.
Then the Byshop put M. Bilney aside, and tooke coū∣sel with his felowes, and afterward calling in M. Bilney, asked him agayne whether he would abiure: but he would make no other aunswere then before. Then the Byshoppe with the consent of the rest, did decree and determine that it was not lawfull to heare a petition which was agaynst the law and enquiring agayne whether he would abiure, he aunswered plainely no, and desired to haue time to con∣sult with his frendes in whom his trust was:* 1.7 and beynge once agayne asked whether he would returne and instanly desired thereunto, or els the sentence must be read: he re∣quired the Bishop to geue him licence to deliberate wyth himselfe vntill the next morow, whether he might abiure the heresies wherwith he was defamed, or no. The Bishop graunted him, that he should haue a litle time to deliberate with M. Dancaster: but Bilney required space till the next morow, to consult with M. Farmar and Mayster Dan∣caster. But the Bishop would not graunt him his request,* 1.8 for feare least he should appeale. But at the last, the Bishop enclining vnto him, graunted him two nightes respite to deliberate: that is to say, till Saterday at 9. of the clocke a∣fore noone, and then to geue a playn determinate answere, what he would do in the premisses.
The 7. day of December, in the yeare and place afore∣sayd, the Byshop of London, with the other Byshops be∣ing assembled, Bilney also personally appered. Whom the Bishop of London asked, whether he would now returne to the vnity of the Church, and reuoke the errors and he∣resies wherof he stood accused, detected, and conuicted. Who aunswered that now he was perswaded by Maister Dan∣caster and other his frendes, he would submitte hymselfe, trusting that they woulde deale gently with him, both in his abiuration, & penaunce.* 1.9 Then he desired that he might read his abiuration: which the Byshop graunted. When he had read the same secretly by himselfe, and was retur∣ned, being demaunded what he would doe in the premis∣ses he aunswered that he would abiure and submitte him∣selfe, and there openly read his abiuration,* 1.10 and subscribed it and deliuered it to the Bishoppe, which then did absolue him: and for his penaunce enioyned him,* 1.11 that he should a∣bide in prison, appoynted by the Cardinall, till he were by him released: and moreouer, the next day he shoulde go be∣fore the procession, in the Cathedrall Church of S. Paule, bare headed, with a Fagot on his shoulder, & should stand before the Preacher at Paules Crosse, all the Sermō time. Ex Regist. Lond.
Here for so much as mention is made before, of v. let∣ters or Epistles, whiche this good man wrote to Cutbert Tonstall Bishop of London, and by the sayd Byshop de∣liuered vnto the Registers, we thought good to insert cer∣tayne thereof, such as could come to our handes. The Co∣py of which letters, as they were written by him in Latin, because they are in the former Edition to be seene and read in the same Latine, wherein he wrote them, it shall suffice in this booke to expresse the same onely in Englishe. Con∣cerning the first Epistle, which conteyneth the whole sto∣ry of his conuersion, and seemeth more effectual in the La∣tine, then in the Englishe, we haue exhibited it in the se∣cond Edition, pag. 1141. and therefore haue here onelye made mention of the same briefely. The copy whereof be∣ginneth thus.
¶Reuerendo in Christo patri D. Cutb. Ton∣stallo, Lond. Episcopo, T. Bilnaeus Salutem in Christo, cum omni subiectione tan∣to presulidebitam.
HOc nomine, pater in Christo obseruāde, longe beatiorem me puto, quòd ad tuae Paternitatis examinationem vocari me contigit. Ea enim eruditione es, ea vitae integ••itate (quod om∣nes