* 1.1THe next daye in the morning, being the 9. daye of Fe∣bruary, before their open appearaunce, the Bishop sent for William Pigot, and Stephen Knight, into his great chamber in his Pallace, where he perswaded with them to recant: and deny their former profession.
Who answered, that they were not perswaded in their consciences to returne and abiure theyr opinions, where∣unto they had subscribed. Within a while after, they were all three) with Thomas Tomkins, and William Hunter afore named) brought openly into the Consistorye, the ix. day of February aforesayd, and there had the same articles propoūded vnto them, which were before propoūded vn∣to the foresayde Thomas Tomkins (as appeareth in the discourse of his historye) and therto also subscribed these wordes: I do so beleue.
* 1.2The Bishop also vsed certayne talke vnto Iohn Lau∣rence onely. Whereunto he aunswered in this manner: That hee was a Priest, and was consecrated and made a Priest about eightene yeares past, and that he was some∣time a Blacke Fryer professed: that also hee was assured vnto a mayd, whome he intended to haue maryed.
And being agayne demaunded his opinion vppon the Sacrament, he said, that it was a remembraunce of Chry∣stes body, and that many haue bene deceiued in the belee∣uing the true body of Christ to be in the Sacrament of the Aultar, and that all such as doe not beleue as he doth, doe erre. After this talke and other fayre wordes and threat∣ninges, they were all of thē commaunded to appeare again at after noone.