Page 658
THE SIXT PART OR SECTION, pertaining to the last 300. yeares. (Book 6)
A preface to the reader.
ACcording to the fiue sondry diuersities and alterations of the Churche, so haue I deuided hetherto the order of thys presente Church story into fiue principall partes, euery part containing 300. yeares. So that nowe comming to the laste 300. yeares, that is, to the last times of the Church, counting from the time of Wickleffe: For as muche as in the compasse of the sayd last 300 yeres, are contained great troubles and perturbations of the Church, with the meruailous reformation of the same through the wonderous o∣peration of the almighty, all which things cannot be comprehended in one booke, I haue therefore disposed the sayd latter 30. yeares, into diuers bookes, beginning nowe with the sixt booke, at the raigne of king Henry the vj. In which booke, beside the greeuous and sundry persecutions raised vp by Antichrist, to be noted, here in is also to be obserued, that where as it hath of long time bene recey∣ued and thought of the common people, that this religion now generally vsed, hath sprong vp and risen but of late, euen by the space (as many do thinke) of 20. or 30. yeares, it may now manifestly appeare, not onely by the Acts and Monuments heretofore passed, but also by the hystories here after following, howe this profession of Christes religion hath bene spread abroade in Englande of olde and auncient time, not onely from the space of these 200. late yeares, from the time of Wyckleffe, but hathe continually from time to time sparkled abroade, although the flames thereof haue neuer so perfectly burst out, as they haue done within these hundred yeares and more: As by these hystories here collected & gathered out of Registers, especially of the Diocesse of Norwich, shall manifestly appeare: wherein may be seene what men, and how many both men and women within the sayde Diocesse of Norwich, haue bene, which haue defended the same cause of doctrine, which now is receiued by vs in the Church. Which persones althoughe then they were not so strongly armed in their cause and quarel, as of late yeres they haue bene, yet were they warriours in Christes churche, and fought for their power, in the same cause. And although they gaue backe through tyrannie, yet iudge thou the best good Reader, and referre the cause therof to God, who reuealeth all things according to his determined will and appoynted time.
* 1.1THis yong prince being vnder the age of one yeare, after the death of his father,* 1.2 succeeded in his reigne and kingdom of England, Anno 1422. and in the 8. yeare was crowned at Westminster: and the 2. yeare after was crowned also at Paris, Henry bishop of Win∣chester, Cardinall being present at them both,* 1.3 & raigned 38. yeres, and then was deposed by Edwarde the 4. as heere after (Christ willing) shall be declared in his time.* 1.4 In the firste yeare of his raigne was burned the constant witnesse bea∣rer and testis of Christes doctrine, William Tailour, a Priest vnder Henry Chichesley Archbishop of Canterbu∣ry. Of this William Tailour I read,* 1.5 that in the dayes of Thomas Arundell, hee was first apprehended, and abiu∣red. Afterwarde in the daies of Henry Chichesley, aboute the yeare of our Lorde 1421. which was a yeare before hys burning, the said William Tailour appeared again in the conuocation before the Archbishop being brought by the Bishop of Worcester, being complained of to haue taught at Bristow these Articles folowing.
* 1.6First, that whosoeuer, hangeth any scripture about his necke, taketh away the honor due onely to God, & geueth it to the Deuill.
Secondly, that no humaine persone is to be worship∣ped, but onely God is to be adored.
Thirdly, that the Saints are not to be worshipped nor inuocated.
Upon these Articles the sayde William Tailour being examined, denied that he did preache or hold them in way of defending them, but only did commune and talke vpon the same, especially vpon the second and third article, only in way of reasoning, and for argument sake. And to iustify his opiniō to be true in that which he did hold, he brought out of his bosome a paper or libell wrytten, wherein were contained certaine Articles, wyth the testimonies of the Doctours alleaged, and exhibited the same vnto the arch∣bishop. Who then being bidde to stande aside, the Archby∣shop consulting together with the byshops and other pre∣lates, what was to be done in the matter, deliuered the wrytinges vnto M. Iohn Castle, and Iohn Rikinghale, the two vicechauncelors of Oxforde and Cambridge, and to Iohn Langdon monke of Canterbury. Who aduising with themselues, and with other deuines, about the Arti∣cles and allegations, on the monday following, presented the sayde Articles of William Tailour, to the Archbishop and Prelates, as erroneous and hereticall. Wherevppon William Tailour being called before them, in conclusion was contented to reuoke the same, and for hys penaunce was by them condemned to perpetuall prison.
Notwithstanding, through fauour they were conten∣ted, that he should be released from his carceral indurance, in case hee woulde putte in sufficient surety in the kinges Chancerye, and sweare that he shall neuer holde or fauour any such opinions hereafter. And thus the sayde William Tailor apoynted to appeare the next Wednesday at Lam∣beth before the Archbishoppe, to take his absolution from his long excommunication during ye time from Thomas Arundell, appeared againe before him, where he laying a side his Arunlousa, that is: his cloke, his cap, and stripped vnto hys doublet, kneeled at the feete of the Archbyshop. Who then standing vp, and hauing a rodde in hys hande, began the Psalme Misere. &c. hys chaplaines aunswering the second verse.* 1.7 After that was sayde, the Collect, Deus cui proprium. &c. with certaine other prayers. And so taking an oth of him, the Archbishop committed him to the custo∣die of the Byshop of Worcester, to whome power and au∣thority was permitted to release him, vpon the conditions aforesaide. And thus was William Tailour, for that time absolued, being enioyned notwythstanding to appeare at the next conuocation whēsoeuer it shuld be, before the said Archbishop or his successour that should follow him.
In the meane time, while William Tailour was thus in the custody of the Bishop of Worcester, there passed cer∣taine wrytings betweene hym, and one Thomas Smith priest at Bristowe, in the which wrytings William Tai∣lour replied against ye sayd Thomas, concerning the que∣stion of worshipping Saints. Upon the occasion of which reply, being brought to the hands of the byshop of Worce∣ster, William Tailour began a newe to be troubled, & was broughte againe before the publicke conuocation of the cleargy, by the said bishop of Worcester, to aunswere vnto his wrytings. This was an. 1422. the 11. day of Februarie. Unto the which conuocation the sayd William being pre∣sented, his wrytings were read to him, which he woulde not, nor could not deny to be of his owne hand wryting.
The tenour and effect of whose wryting onely tended to prooue,* 1.8 that euery petition and prayer for any superna∣turall gift, ought to be directed to God alone, & to no crea∣ture. All be it in this his wryting he did not vtterly deny, that it was not lawfull in no respecte to pray to Saintes, (and bringeth for the same Thomas Aquine) but onely in respect of that worship, whych is called Cultus latriae: And further so prosecuteth his minde herein,* 1.9 that he semeth lit∣tle or nothing to differ from the superstition of the papists: as most plainely appeareth by his owne wordes, saying: Nunquam tamen negaui, aut negare intendo, merita aut sancto∣rum suffragia tam beatorum, quam viantium, tam viuis, quam mortuis ad hoc dispositis, quantum possunt, suffragari, vel profice∣re, quia hoc est elicibile ex Scriptura, quae non fallit, & ex conso∣na ratione. &c. And moreouer hee inferreth the example of Moses, who prayed vnto God, alleadging the merites of