Richard Belward of Erisam in the Dioces of Norwich.
RIchard Belward of Erisam, in the Diocesse of Nor∣wiche, was accused for holding and teaching these er∣rours and opinions heere vnder wrytten, contrary to the determination of the church of Rome.
* 1.1In primis, that Ecclesiasticall ministers and Ordinaries haue no power to excommunicate, neither can excommu∣nicate: And all be it that a Bishop doe excommunicate any man, God doth absolue him.
Item, that he held the erronious opinions and conclu∣sions, that Syr Iohn Oldcastle helde when he was in pri∣son, & affirmed that Syr Iohn Oldcastle was a true Ca∣tholicke man, and falsly condemned and put to death with∣out any reasonable cause.
Item, that such as go on pilgrimage, offering to ima∣ges made of woode and stone, are excommunicate because they ought to offer to the quicke, and not to the dead: and that the Ecclesiasticall Ministers, that is to say the curates do sell God vppon Easter day, when as they receiue offe∣rings of such as should communicate before they do mini∣ster the Sacrament vnto them.
Item, that he counselled diuers women, ye they should not offer in the Churche for the dead, neither wyth women that were purified.
Item, that he blamed diuers of his neighbors that re∣fused his doctrine,* 1.2 saying vnto thē: truly ye are sooles that deny to learne the doctrine of my sect, for your neighbours which are of my sect, are able to confound and vauquish al other that are of your sect.
Item, that the Saintes whych are in heauen, ought in no case to be prayed vnto, but onely God.
Item, that the sayd Richard keepeth schooles of lolar∣dy in the English tong, in the towne of Dychingham, and a certaine Parchment maker bryngeth hym all the bookes containing that doctrine from London.
The 5. day of July 1424. the sayde Richarde Belward was brought before Iohn, Byshop of Norwich sitting in place of iudgement, wheras the foresaid Articles were ob∣iected against the sayde Richarde, whych he there denyed: whereupō the bishop appoynted him an other day to purge himselfe, the monday next after the feast of S. Marget: vp∣on which day being the 24. of Iuly, in the yeare aforesayd, he appeared againe before the Bishop, and brought wyth him 9. of his neighbors to purge hym vpon those articles, and there did solemnely purge himselfe. And afterwarde, for somuch as the said Bishop suspected the sayd Richarde Belward greatly of lolardie, hee commaunded him there presently to sweare vpon the Euangelistes, that from that day forwarde he should not wittingly preach, teach, or de∣fend any error or heresy, contrary to the churche of Rome, neither aide, assist, fauour or maintaine, priuely or apertly, any maner of person or persons, that should hold or main∣taine the sayde errours or heresies. In the presence of M. William Bernam, Iohn Wadden, Robert Serle & Iohn Berne Esquire, and other of his neighbours which came vnto his purgation.
In like maner Iohn Goddesel of Dichingham parch∣mentmaker, was detected and accused vpon the same arti∣cles, and thereupon brought before the bishop:* 1.3 whereas he denying them, purged himselfe by his neighbours, as Ri∣chard Belward before had done, being sworne also in lyke maner, as he was, and so was dismissed and set at libertie, vntill the yeare of our Lord 1428. When as he was againe apprehended, accused and abiured, as shalbe more at large declared in the hystorie when we come to that yeare. Syr Hugh Pie also, chaplaine of Ludney in the dioces of Nor∣wich, was likewise accused and brought before the byshop of Norwich ye 5. day of Iuly.* 1.4 An. 1424. for holding of these opinions following.
That the people ought not to go on pilgrimage.
Item, that ye people ought not to geue almes, but only vnto suche as begge at theyr dores.
Item,* 1.5 that the image of the crosse and other images are not to be worshipped. And that the said Hugh, had cast the crosse of Bromeholde into the fire to be burned, which hee tooke from one Iohn welgate of Ludney. Which articles as is aforesayde, being obiected against him, he vtterly de∣nied: Wherupon he had a day appoynted to purge himselfe by the witnes of 3. lay men and 3. priests. That so done, he was sworne as the other before, and so dismissed.
After this, in the yeare of our Lorde 1428. king Henry the 6. sent downe most cruel letters of commission vnto I. Exetor and Iacolet Germaine, keeper of the castle of Col∣chester, for the apprehending of Sir William White Priest, and others suspected of heresies, the tenor wherof, hereaf∣ter ensueth.
¶ The copie of the kings letters directed to Iohn Exeter, and Iacolet Germaine, keeper of the ca∣stle of Colchester, for the apprehending of Sir William White priest and other, (as they called them) lollards.
HEnry by the grace of God king of Englande and of Fraunce,* 2.1 Lord of Ireland, to his well beloued Iohn Exetor, and Iacolet Germaine, keeper of the castle of Colchester health.Ye shall vnderstand that we fully trusting vnto your fidelitye and circumspections, haue appoynted you ioyntly and seuerally to take and arrest William White priest, and Thomas, late chap∣laine of Setling, in the countie of Norfolke, and William Nor∣thampton priest, and al other whatsoeuer they be that are suspect of heresy or lollardy, wheresoeuer they may be founde within the liberties or without, and straight way being so taken, to send the vnto our next gaile or prison, vnto such time, as we shall haue ta∣ken other order for their deliuery: And therefore wee straightly commaunde you, that ye diligently attende about the premisses, and fulfill the same in forme aforesayde. Also we charge and com∣mand all and singuler Iustices of peace, Maiors, Shriues, Bailiffes, Cunstables, and all other our faithfull officers, by the tenoure of these presents, that they do assist, aide, and counsaile you & euery of you, in the execution of the premisses, as it shall be comely for them. In witnes whereof, we haue caused these our letters pa∣tentes to be made.
Witnes my selfe at Westminster, the 6. of Iuly, the 6. yeare of our raigne
.
By vertue of which commission we finde in olde Mo∣numents, that wythin shorte space after. Iohn Exeter, which was appointed one of the commissioners, attached 6. persons in the towne of Bungay in the diocesse of Nor∣wich, and committed them to William Day, and William Roe, Constables of the towne of Bungay, to be sent with∣in 10. dayes folowing vnder safe custodie, vnto the castle of Norwich. Whose names, through the antiquity of the mo∣nument were so defaced that we coulde not attaine to the perfecte knowledge of them all: onely 3. names partlye remained in the booke to be read, which were these.
¶ Iohn Waddon of Tenterdon, in the countie of kent, Bartlemewe, Monke of Ersham, in the countie of Norfolke, Corneleader, a martyed man. William Skuts.
These 3. were in the custodie of the Duke of Northfolk, at hys castle of Fremingham.
Besides these, we also finde in the said old monuments within the diocesse of Norffolke and Suffolke, specially in the townes of Beckels, Ersham, and Ludney, a great nū∣ber both of men and women to haue bene vexed and ca••••e in prison, & after their abiuration, brought to open shame in churches and markets by the bishop of the sayd diocesse called William, and hys Chancellour William Bernham, Iohn Exceter being the Register therein, so that wythin the space of 3. or 4. yeares,* 2.2 that is from the yeare 1428. vn∣to the yeare 1431. about the number of 120. menne and wo∣men are examined and sustained great vexatiō for the pro∣fession of the Christian faithe: of whome some were onely taken vppon suspition onely for eating of meates prohibi∣ted vpon vigil dayes, who of their purgation made, esca∣ped more easily away and wyth lesse punishment, whose names here follow subscribed.
- * 2.3RObert Skiruing of Harlstone.
- ...Wiliam Skiruing.
- ...Iohn Terry of Ersham.
- ...Iohn Abtre of Ersham.
- ...Iohn Middleton of Haluergate.
- ...Iohn Wayde of Ersham.
- ...Rich. Clarke of Sething.
- ...Tho. White of Bedingham.
- ...M. Rob. Beete of Berry.
- ...Rich. Page of Clipsly.