The life of William now Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury, examined. Wherein his principall actions, or deviations in matters of doctrine and discipline (since he came to that sea of Canturbury) are traced, and set downe, as they were taken from good hands, by Mr. Robert Bayley, a learned pastor of the Kirk of Scotland, and one of the late commissioners sent from that Nation. Very fitting for all judicious men to reade, and examine, that they may be the better able to censure him for those thing [sic] wherein he hath done amisse. Reade and judge.

About this Item

Title
The life of William now Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury, examined. Wherein his principall actions, or deviations in matters of doctrine and discipline (since he came to that sea of Canturbury) are traced, and set downe, as they were taken from good hands, by Mr. Robert Bayley, a learned pastor of the Kirk of Scotland, and one of the late commissioners sent from that Nation. Very fitting for all judicious men to reade, and examine, that they may be the better able to censure him for those thing [sic] wherein he hath done amisse. Reade and judge.
Author
Baillie, Robert, 1599-1662.
Publication
London :: Printed for N B,
in the yeare of Grace. 1643.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Laud, William, 1573-1645 -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Nicanor, Lysimachus, 1603-1641. -- Epistle congratulatorie of Lysimachus Nicanor of the Societie of Jesu, to the Covenanters in Scotland -- Controversial literature.
Church of England -- Controversial literature -- Puritan authors -- Early works to 1800.
Church and state -- England -- Early works to 1800.
Arminianism -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A67904.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The life of William now Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury, examined. Wherein his principall actions, or deviations in matters of doctrine and discipline (since he came to that sea of Canturbury) are traced, and set downe, as they were taken from good hands, by Mr. Robert Bayley, a learned pastor of the Kirk of Scotland, and one of the late commissioners sent from that Nation. Very fitting for all judicious men to reade, and examine, that they may be the better able to censure him for those thing [sic] wherein he hath done amisse. Reade and judge." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A67904.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 12, 2025.

Pages

CHAP. V. The Canterburians avow their em∣bracing of the Popish heresies and grossest errours. (Book 5)

THE nature of heresie is so subtilized by our faction, that so farre as in them lies, it is now quite evanished in the aire, and no more here∣sies are to be found on the earth. With the Socinian

Page 64

Remonstrants, they exeeme all 〈◊〉〈◊〉 controver∣ted this day among any Christians, from being the Subject of heresie: For they tell us, that the beleefe of the doctrines uncontroverted by all is suf∣ficient for salvation. a 1.1 And howsoever some of them will bee content to count the Socinian Ari∣anisme and Macedonianisme to bee true heresies; yet, as we shew before, and all of them do clearethe Popish errors of this imputation. Alwayes not to strive for words, our assertion is, that the grossest of the Roman errours which in the common stile of Protestants, wont to goe for heresies, are main∣tained by the Canterburians for Catholick truths. For to 〈◊〉〈◊〉 this, cast over the bookes of Bellar∣mine, and see if his grossest tenets bee not by them embraced. In his first tome, his errours about the Scriptures imperfection, and doctrinall traditions, seemes to be most weighty. In his second, besides these already named, his defence of the monastick vowes of Limbus Patrum and Purgatory are very palpable. In the third, his ascribing too little to the Sacraments of the old Testament, and too much to the Sacraments of the new, his making all infants in baptisme to bee regenerate, and all non∣baptised to bee damned, his corporall presence of Christs body on the altar, his sacrifice of the Masse, auricular confession, extreame unction, are very grosse corruptions. In the last tome, his errours about faith, justification, merit, free-will, are among the chiefe. In all those, consider how farre our party is long agoe declined to the left hand.

Page 65

Begin with Scripture and traditions: The refor∣med * 1.2 Churches in the harmony of their confessions lay all down one common ground, for their mutuall consent; the Scripures absolute perfection, with∣out the helpe of any doctrinall tradition: Hogh me once this pillar, the whole edifice of the reforma∣tion must fall. To batter downe this fort, the Pa∣pists plant two Engines: One that there is divers Apostolicke and ancient traditions, both rituall and dogmaticall, which beside Scripture with a divine faith must be firmely beleeved: An other, that Scri∣pture must not be taken in any sense by us, but 〈◊〉〈◊〉 wherein the ancient Fathers of the Church have un∣derstood it, or the present Church do take it. In both these very dangerous corruptions our party joines with Rome: They glory b 1.3 and triumph above all other reformed Churches, that they doe embrace doctrinall traditions, for which in Scripture there is no ground; And of this kinde they reckon out some of great importance; such as are, the bap∣tisme of infants, the sanctifying of the Sabboth, the Apostles Creed, the giving of the cup to the people, praying in a knowne tongue, our knowledge of Scripture to be Scripture, the names and num∣ber of the Canonicall bookes and their distinction from Apocrypha, of this kinde they maintaine

Page 66

large as many as Rome. For at the first word they speake to us of six hundreth. c 1.4 Among these traditions, which wee must embrace with an un∣doubted faith: They reckon up the authority of Bishops above Priests, prostration before the altars, worshipping towards the East, crosse in Baptisme, crossing of our faces at all occasions, the standing of a crucifix upon the altar, and what else they please to urge, for which they can get no Scrip∣ture warrant. To this head they referre the very customes of the Popish Church in latter times, for which they have no syllable in any writer let bee in any Father: d 1.5 Yea, all the injunctions of the

Page 67

Bishops must bee Ecclesiastick traditions, where∣to the conscience must submit no lesse then to the precepts of God. e 1.6 In the meane time Scripture must bee stiled the booke of hereticks, f 1.7 a Lesbian 〈◊〉〈◊〉 g 1.8 In no controversies no not in Sermons any use may bee made of it, except so farre as wee can backe our deductions from Scrip∣ture, by consent of the ancient Fathers, or present Church. h 1.9

Page 68

In our most important controversies anent faith, * 1.10 justification, fulfilling of the Law, merite, &c. they teach first, that faith is no more but a bare knowledge, and naked assent, that in the nature of it there is no confidence, no application at all, that the soules confidence and application of Gods pro∣mises, are the acts onely of hope and charity, that justifying faith is the Catholicke faith, a generall assent to the articles of the Apostolicke Creed, that particular personall applying faith, is but presump∣tion and fantasie. i 1.11 Againe, they teach that justi∣fication is ascribed by the Apostle to faith onely, by way of beginning inchoative, because assent to the truth of God, is that first vertue which the chaine of all other vertues, whereby wee are com∣pleatly

Page 69

justified, for common, doth follow. k 1.12 3. That Charity is the forme of Faith, and that to it, the act of Justification is much more reasonably ascribed then to faith. l 1.13 4. That Saint Pauls justification whereby wee stand before the barre of God is nought, but our conversion and sanctificati∣on by our inherent righteousnesse. m 1.14 5. That

Page 70

the fulfilling of Gods Law to us in this life is both possible and easie, that if God did command us any thing which were impossible, hee should bee both unjust and a tyrant. n 1.15

Page 71

6. That not onely manyidoelfulfill the Law with∣out all mortall sinne, but sundry also doe supererogat by doing more then is commanded, by perfor∣ming the counsels of perfection, of chastity, pover∣ty, and obedience: o 1.16 7. That our good workes doe truely deserve and merit eternall life: p 1.17 8. That our obeying the counsels of perfection doe purchase a degree of glory above the ordinary happinesse, q 1.18 All this lately is printed by the faction, nei∣ther that onely, but (which to us seemeth marvel∣lous) when great popular grumblings and sundry publicke challenges hath beene made against the authours of such writs. These whom Canterburie

Page 72

hath employed to apologise for the worlds full sa∣tisfaction, hath not yet beene pleased to disavow any of those writers, nor to expresse the least signe of their indignation against any of their abomina∣tions, r 1.19 but rather by sweetning all with ex∣cuses seeme to vent their desire to have all swallowed downe.

In the doctrine of the Sacraments, from Bellarmins * 1.20 third tombe, they tell us first, that the sacraments of the old testamenr differ from the new, that the one confers grace, the other foresignes grace to bee conferred, that the same distinction must be holden betwixt Iohns and Christs baptimse. s 1.21 2. They tell us that all baptised infants as well reprobat as elect are in baptisme truely regenerat, sanctified,

Page 73

justified, and put in that state wherein if those who are reprobate and thereafter damned should die, they would be infallibly saved. t 1.22 And on the ot her hand they avow that all those who die in their in∣fancy without baptisme, by whatsoever misse, by whosoevers fault, are certainly damned so farre as men can judge: For baptisme is the onely ordnary meane which God hath appointed for their salvati∣on, which failing, salvation must be lost, except we would dreame of extraordinary miracles of the which we have no warrant. w 1.23 3. That the mani∣fold ceremonies of Papists in baptisme and all o∣ther sacraments are either to be embraced as pious

Page 74

ancient rites, or no to be stood upon as being only ceremoniall toyes. x 1.24 For their tenets in the sa∣crament of the supper, wee shall speake anone of them in the head of the masse. 4. They tell us that our dispute about the five bastard sacraments is a plaine logomachy. y 1.25 5. They tell us that not only infants after their baptisme but even men bap∣tised in perfect age who before baptisme gave a suf∣ficient count of their faith, yet they may not bee e∣steemed full Christians while they have received confirmation by the imposition of hands, and that alone by a Bishop. z 1.26 About the orders, they tell us that they agree with Papists in their num∣ber, that the reason why they want their Acolits, sub-deacons and the rest, is but their Churches po∣verty: zz 1.27 Which can scarce well maintaine the two

Page 75

orders of Priests and Deacons. But which in their que∣stions is worst of all, they side here with the Papists in giving to all the Protestant Churches a wound which our enemies proclame to be mortall, fatall, incurable. They tie the conferring of ordours by a full divine right to the office of Bishops, they avow that the lawfull use of all ordination and outward ec∣clesiasticke jurisdiction is by God put in the hands of their persons alone. Other reformed Kirkes therefore wanting Bishops, their Ministers must preach, cele∣brate the Sacraments, administer discipline not only without a lawfull warrand, but also against the ordi∣nance of God. When they are put in minde of this great wound given by them to all other reformed Churches, they either strive to cover it with the fig∣tree leaves of an imagined case of necessity which never was, or else plainely to passe over it as immedi∣cable. No marvaile if the Bishops of England refuse to admit without a new ordination, these who has beene ordained in Holland or France, and they make no scruple to admit without new orders, these who has beene ordained at Rome. &c. 1.28 6. In Matrimony they will keepe not only the Popish Sa∣cramentall words and signes, the Popish times of Lent and other dismall daies, except the Bishops give their dispensation, but also they will have the

Page 76

whole matrimoniall causes ruled by the Popes 〈◊〉〈◊〉, yea, which is more, they avow that the Can∣non-law by Acts of Parliament yet unrepealled stands in vigour amongst them. a 1.29

Except in some few things which are directly op∣posit to some late lawes of the land and that Can∣non-law they will have extendit as far downe as the very Councell of Basile. b 1.30 And as far up as the con∣stitutions of the first Popes. c 1.31 Which divers of the Papists themselves acknowledge to bee supposi∣titious, yet our men will defend them all, and with them the Canons ofthe Apostles, the constitutions of Clemence and all such trash. d 1.32

Page 77

In the sacrament of pennance they 〈◊〉〈◊〉 first, that auricular confession was evill abolished, and is ve∣ry expedient to be restored. e 1.33 2. That God hath given a judiciall power of absolution to every Priest, which every one of the people is obliged to make use of, especially before the communion by con∣fessing to the Priest all their sins without the con∣cilement of any. f 1.34 3. That God in the Heaven will certainly follow the sentence of the Priest ab∣solving on earth. g 4. Beside a private confes∣sor, it were very expedient to have in every congre∣gation

Page 78

a publick penitentiarie, who in the beginning of Lent on ashe-wednesday might in the Kirk sit in his reclinatory, and sprinkling dust on the head of every parishioner, enjoyn them their Lent-pennance, whereby they may truly satisfie Gods judgement for their sins, and in the end of lent or Shrif-thursday before Pasche give his absolution to those who have fully satisfied. h 1.35 Extreame unction, if reports

Page 79

may be trusted, is already in practice among them, but howsoever, they avow in Print their satisfaction with the Papists in this point, if so be the ceremony be no made absolutely necessary. i 1.36

Anent the Monastick life, consider how farre our * 1.37 men are from Popery, they tell us first, that the putting downe of the Monasteries in England by Henry the eight, let be by other Protestant Princes else-where, was a worke exceeding impious, and very prejudiciall both to the Church and Crowne: k 1.38 2. That the Monks for the paterne of their orders have the Prophets and the Apostles, and spe∣cially Iohn the Baptist: l 1.39 3. That their habits to their very tree-shoone hath Scripture warrant: m 1.40 4. That the Virgine Mary was truely a Nunne, and that the Nunnes this day are much to

Page 80

bee commended for the following of her paterne: n 1.41 5. That the present Carthusians, Franciscans, and the rest of the Fraternities are very good and holy people, worthy in their very orders of Mona∣stick life of our imitation: o 1.42 6. That their barefooted processions through the streets, that their Canonicall houres of devotion, at midnight in their Cloisters, that in great festivall Eves, their going at Mid-night, with confluence of people to Towne-churches is all commendable ser∣vice. p 1.43

Page 81

In the head of Purgatorie and prayer for the * 1.44 dead, thus farre long agoe are they proceeded, first, they avow openly Limbus Patrum, telling us, that the Saints before Christ were not onely not in hea∣ven, but truely in an infernall place, even in a lake, where in one nooke the godly were in peace, and the wicked in torments, that Abrahams bosome was here, betweene which and hell a certaine gulfe made but a tolerable distance, that Iacob, Samuel, and David, and other of the ancients were mour∣ned for at their death, because their soules went not to heaven, but truely to a kind of hell: their minde in these things, as their custome is, they propone in the words of some Father, that by the shelter of their authoritie they may keep off their owne head the indignation of the people: q 1.45 Again they tell us that Christ before he opened heavens gate to any soule, he went first downe, and loosed the soules in prison: yea, if yee beleeve M. Maxwell (who hath written much for the drawing of our Church the factions way) hee went downe to the lowest hells, and delivered thence a number of Pagans such as Aristotle, Plato, Socrates, and a world of mo:

Page 82

r 1.46. Our maine pillers against purgatory they hew downe with the popish axes: when wee rea∣son that Scripture makes no mention of any third place betwixt Hell and Heaven; they reply, that there are many things whereof Scripture makes no mention. When we reason that Scripture makes mention expressely of two places for soules after death, they use the popish distinction, that after the resurrection there is but two eternall places, but that before the resurrection there may be three tem∣porall: s 1.47 4. When papists urge upon us prayer for the dead, they will not contradict them; yea, they commend oblations in the Lords Supper, and prayers there for the dead in particular. t 1.48

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.