Page 387
A Definition of Sphacelus, and the cure thereof from some ancient Writers, to shew the Reader their opinions and judgments thereof, for that some Artists have grounded their judgments, that their relations are according to good practice; and therefore are to be imitated.
A Sphacelus, saith Falopius, and likewise Fabritius, is an affect of a part already utterly mortified, and therefore not to be cured but by amputation, that the whole body come not to corrup∣tion thereby,* 1.1 and this abscission is not done without great danger of death: for often, even in the instant act of amputation, the Patient dyeth by the profusion of blood and spirits, wherefore the strength of the sick is to be considered: and Cornelius Celsus alledgeth, Cap. 25.* 1.2 lib. 5. that in his time they used to take off the Sphacelated member, by cutting the flesh round about unto the bone, in the whole part, near the rotten or sphacelated part, and cutting ever in the live flesh, not leaving any of the mortified flesh untaken away; further Celsus (say* 1.3 they) doth admonish us in this work, that the skin and also the flesh, be brought and drawn upwards, that the bone may be the better co∣vered by some of the said part, in the healing of the stump; but the same Authour confesseth also, that by such abscission causing exceeding pain, with over-large effusion of blood and spirits, death usually fol∣loweth: therefore to avoid hemorrage, they must presently use actual Cauteries to burn the parts adjacent, in which may be conjectured, how cruel that course is to the Patient, and uncomfortable; and pre∣pare the upper part thick enough, to be a firm cover to the vessels.
But after himself not approving that course, he saith, that he took another way of curing, which as he said, happily succeeded; by which work no profusion of blood hapned, because no blood floweth from a mortified part, neither is grief moved therein; but lest the corruption should spread it self further, (saith the said Authour) I burned the putrefied part, remaining every where with red-hot Irons, that were heavy and well burnt, untill the Patient did feel the heat of the fire, and that he suffered some small pain; and the rather they did it, they write, because the same operation is very profitable, and therefore burned ever some of the sound flesh also, because the putrefaction is best to be drawn out by a red-hot Iron, as I suppose, saith he, which is apparent to the eye, for the humours are apparently seen to boyl about the Iron; and likewise the weaknesse of the parts considered by burning, it is fortified, the adjacent parts being freed from many noxi∣ous humours thereby, so that the weak part receiveth strength, and within a few dayes begins to separate the living from the dead part, and