Answer.
I conceive both places are alike to this purpose, to make remarriage upon Divorce lawful, for in the 5th. of Matthew, remarriage is plain∣ly intended by our Saviour,
The case of divorce and re-marriage thereupon discussed by a reverend prelate of the Church of England and a private of the Church of England and a private gentleman ; occasioned by the late act of Parliament for the divorce of the Lord Rosse.
About this Item
- Title
- The case of divorce and re-marriage thereupon discussed by a reverend prelate of the Church of England and a private of the Church of England and a private gentleman ; occasioned by the late act of Parliament for the divorce of the Lord Rosse.
- Author
- Wolseley, Charles, Sir, 1630?-1714.
- Publication
- London :: Printed for Nevill Simmons ...,
- 1673.
- Rights/Permissions
-
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
- Subject terms
- Divorce -- Great Britain -- Biblical teaching.
- Remarriage -- Religious aspects -- Early works to 1800.
- Link to this Item
-
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A66870.0001.001
- Cite this Item
-
"The case of divorce and re-marriage thereupon discussed by a reverend prelate of the Church of England and a private of the Church of England and a private gentleman ; occasioned by the late act of Parliament for the divorce of the Lord Rosse." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A66870.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 14, 2024.
Pages
Page 104
for he saith, whosoever puts away his Wife except for Fornication, which is to be understood such putting away as they Then used, which was to remarry after it, for he sayes expresly, who∣ever puts away his Wife and marries another: and he sayes, if the woman marry again (except put away for the cause of Fornication she com∣mits Adultery, the excepti∣on plainly implyes her re∣marriage is no Adultery, if put away for Fornication, and if the woman so put away may lawfully marry again, much more the man that did put her away: if it be lawful for either
Page 105
to marry, it must needs be for both, for it must be up∣on supposition of the Mar∣riage-bond dissolved.