Anno 1640.
[Car. 16] April 13, 1640. The Parliament met, when the Earl of Strafford was led into the Lords House, by * 1.1 two Noblemen, to take his place according to his Degree.
He gave an account to the House what he had done in Ireland; having there obtained a Grant of the Parliament of Four Subsidies, for the maintenance of ten thousand Foot, and fifteen hundred Horse. And it was urged by some, as a good President for the Parliament of England.
The Lord Cottington reported in the Lords House, That by the King's Command, he and Secre∣tary Windebank, and the Attorney General, had ex∣amined Lord Louden in the Tower, touching the Letter of the Covenanters to the French King; That Louden acknowledged the hand-writing to be his, and that it was framed before the Pacification at Berwick, to be in readiness, but was never sent to that King: And that it was supprest upon the Pacification.
The Lords nevertheless thought fit that Louden should be continued in the Tower, until further E∣vidence, either to convict, or to clear him.
Glanvill, who had engaged to be a better Ser∣vant to the King than formerly, was now Speaker * 1.2 of the House of Commons, and very active to pro∣mote his Majestie's desires, whereof he gave suffi∣cient testimony; and of the change of his former Opinion.
A Message was sent by the King to the Commons, which was for Supplies; representing to them, * 1.3 the intollerable Indignities and Injuries wherewith the Scots had treated him; and he declared, that if the House of Commons would assist him, suitable to the Exigency of his Occasions, he would quit his claim of Ship-money, and give them contentment in all their just Demands.
This Message did take much with the House; the Speaker, Sir John Wray, and others, cried it up: yet they first insisted upon a Security in three Points.
- 1. For clearing the Subjects Property.
- 2. For establishing Religion.
- 3. For the Privilege of Parliament.
Many Conferences were between the Lords and Commons, and warm Debates in both Houses up∣on the old Question; Which should precede, the King's Supply, or the Subjects Grievances?
In the debates, Strafford was magnified, for be∣ing a chief Instrument to bring on this Parliament; at length, the Lords, after a strong division, Voted for the King, and the House of Commons for the Subjects.
But it was not long ere this difference was un∣happily decided; Secretary Vane, who by the King's appointment, was to make known the par∣ticulars of his Desires, demanded Twelve Sub∣sidies.
At which high and unreasonable Demand (as some called it) many of the House of Commons were greatly distasted, and expressed themselves to that purpose; yet were generally inclined to have given (no usual, or lean Gift) the Gift of Six Subsidies.
Sir Henry Vane escaped not without his Censures, * 1.4 That his Commission from the King was but to demand six Subsidies,; and that his mistake in requiring twelve Subsidies, was industrious, and on purpose to raise the House to animosity: Which took effect, but whe∣ther intended so, or not, is hard to judge.
The King advising with his Juncto, the averse∣ness of the House of Commons to any compliance with him, and their sharp Debates upon the old score of Grievances was rendred to him so despe∣rate, that May 5th. he ordered the Dissolution of that Parliament.
The Councel given to Dissolve this Parliament, * 1.5 was greatly and generally disliked; and the differ∣ences between the King and his People (which were of late too much encreased, and were hoped might have been cemented by this Parliament) were by the Dissolution thereof aggravated; and the Scots Troubles which many sober men expected this Parliament would have appeased, were by the breach of it, feared to grow wider; and the chief Blame and Odium of all, was by many laid upon Archbishop Laud. He was more busie in Temporal * 1.6 Affairs, and Matters of State, than his Predecessors of later times had been. Judge Whitelocke who was anciently and throughly acquainted with him, and knew his Disposition, would say, He was too full of fire, though a just and good man; and that his want of Experience in State Matters, and his too much Zeal for the Church, and heat, if he proceeded in the way he was then in, would set this Nation on fire.
By his Councel chiefly (as it was father'd upon him) the Parliament being dissolved, yet he per∣swaded the King to continue the sitting of the Con∣vocation, by a new Commission granted to them for the conclusion of such Matters as were then in treaty amongst them.
Yet by the Opinion of Finch, Maunchester, Lit∣tleton, * 1.7 Banks, Heath, and Shelton, signified to the King, the Convocation called by the King's Writ, was not to Dissolve, but by the King's Writ, notwithstand∣ing the Dissolution of the Parliament. But it was held best, and to clear all Objections, to continue them by this new Commission.