Of idolatry a discourse, in which is endeavoured a declaration of, its distinction from superstition, its notion, cause, commencement, and progress, its practice charged on Gentiles, Jews, Mahometans, Gnosticks, Manichees Arians, Socinians, Romanists : as also, of the means which God hath vouchsafed towards the cure of it by the Shechinah of His Son / by Tho. Tenison ...

About this Item

Title
Of idolatry a discourse, in which is endeavoured a declaration of, its distinction from superstition, its notion, cause, commencement, and progress, its practice charged on Gentiles, Jews, Mahometans, Gnosticks, Manichees Arians, Socinians, Romanists : as also, of the means which God hath vouchsafed towards the cure of it by the Shechinah of His Son / by Tho. Tenison ...
Author
Tenison, Thomas, 1636-1715.
Publication
London :: Printed for Francis Tyton ...,
1678.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Idols and images -- Worship.
Idolatry.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A64364.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Of idolatry a discourse, in which is endeavoured a declaration of, its distinction from superstition, its notion, cause, commencement, and progress, its practice charged on Gentiles, Jews, Mahometans, Gnosticks, Manichees Arians, Socinians, Romanists : as also, of the means which God hath vouchsafed towards the cure of it by the Shechinah of His Son / by Tho. Tenison ..." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A64364.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.

Pages

PART 2. Of the Idolatry of the Manichees.

WIth the Gnosticks I will join the Manichees, both agreeing in obscene Superstitions d 1.1, and in the worship of the principal evil Daemon; and both being branches from the same Magical Trunk of Py∣thagorean Philosophy. Cubricus or Manes took the oc∣casion of his Heresie from his Marriage with the Wi∣dow of Terbinthus, who died in exercising his Magical Tricks. Terbinthus, who also disguis'd himself in Per∣sia under the name of Budda, deriv'd his folly from his Master Scythianus a Saracen in Egypt. Scythianus was learned in the Writings of the Grecians, and wrote four Books of Pythagorean Magick. And Lucas Holste∣nius rightly observeth e 1.2, that the twofold 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 of

Page 156

the Pythagoreans which comprehendeth [〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉], the contrary combinations of the principles of unity and division, was the root of the two contrary Manichaean Powers. These Pythagoras learned from the Egyptians, who be∣sides a good principle own'd Typhon (called also Seth, Bebon, and Smy) a principle of Evil and Tyranny.

For Manes, he strain'd the conceit of the Pythagore∣an Soul of the World to such a degree of extravagance, that he plac'd a perceptive spirit, (as Epiphanius no∣teth) in every Creature. He would not so much as break his Bread, or cut a Pot-herb, though he had cru∣elty enough to eat them. For certainly if Bread were still alive after grinding and baking, it remained so in the broken pieces of it. But how wild a flight does mans fancy take, when it moves it self only upon its own wings!

I do not recall any passage in History which sheweth concerning this monstrous Heretick, that he either prayed or sacrificed to this principle of evil. If he did neither, he yet made an Idol of it by exalting it in his mind, to that undue supremacy. And on the other hand, he turned the Author of all good into another Idol. For as we are instructed by Theodoret in his first Book of Heretical Fables, he confined that Principle to three quarters of the World, bestowing the Sou∣thern parts upon Matter, the dark Principle, or the De∣vil. He likewise sacrilegiously robbed God of that part of his Providence which dispenseth righteous judg∣ments. Further, as the same Theodoret relateth, he some∣times called the Sun and Moon his Deities. Sometimes he called the Sun, Christ; and prov'd it as Enthusiasts prove their Dreams, by the Eclipse it suffered at his Crucifixion. Sometimes he maintained them to be two Ships which conveyed the Souls which depart hence,

Page 157

from Matter to Light. With reason then did St. Austin a 1.3 thus confess his Manichaean impiety;

My vain fantasm and my error was [then] my God.
But of the Gnostick and Manichaean extravagance enough. I I come in the next place to speak of people much more sober, and yet not without a mixture of madness.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.