Orang-outang, sive, Homo sylvestris, or, The anatomy of a pygmie compared with that of a monkey, an ape, and a man to which is added, A philological essay concerning the pygmies, the cynocephali, the satyrs and sphinges of the ancients : wherein it will appear that they are all either apes or monkeys, and not men, as formerly pretended / by Edward Tyson ...

About this Item

Title
Orang-outang, sive, Homo sylvestris, or, The anatomy of a pygmie compared with that of a monkey, an ape, and a man to which is added, A philological essay concerning the pygmies, the cynocephali, the satyrs and sphinges of the ancients : wherein it will appear that they are all either apes or monkeys, and not men, as formerly pretended / by Edward Tyson ...
Author
Tyson, Edward, 1650-1708.
Publication
London :: Printed for Thomas Bennet ... and Daniel Brown ... and are to be had of Mr. Hunt ...,
1699.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Pygmies -- Early works to 1800.
Anatomy, Comparative.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A64096.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Orang-outang, sive, Homo sylvestris, or, The anatomy of a pygmie compared with that of a monkey, an ape, and a man to which is added, A philological essay concerning the pygmies, the cynocephali, the satyrs and sphinges of the ancients : wherein it will appear that they are all either apes or monkeys, and not men, as formerly pretended / by Edward Tyson ..." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A64096.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 16, 2025.

Pages

Page 92

The Orang-Outang or Pygmie more resembled a Man, than Apes and Monkeys do.

  • 1. IN having the Hair of the Shoulder tending downwards; and that of the Arm, upwards.
  • 2. In the Face 'twas liker a Man; having the Forehead larger, and the Rostrum or Chin shorter.
  • 3. In the outward Ear likewise except as to it's Cartilage, which was thinner as in Apes.
  • 4. In the Fingers; which were much thicker than in Apes.
  • 5. In being in all respects designed by Nature, to walk erect; where∣as Apes and Monkeys want a great many Advantages to do so.
  • 6. The Nates or Buttocks larger than in the Ape-kind.
  • 7. It had Calves in it's Legs.
  • 8. The Shoulders and Breast were more spread.
  • 9. The Heel was longer.
  • 10. The Membrana Adiposa placed here, next to the Skin.
  • 11. The Peritonaeum in the Groin entire; and not perforated, or pro∣truded, as in Apes and Monkeys.
  • 12. The Intestines or Guts much longer.
  • 13. The Intestines being very different in their bigness, or largeness of their Canalis.
  • 14. In having a Caecum or Appendicula Vermiformis, which Apes and Monkeys have not: and in not having the beginning of the Colon so pro∣jected or extended, as Apes and Monkeys have.
  • 15. The Insertion of the Ductus Bilarius and the Ductus Pancreaticus in a Man, the Pygmie, and an Ape was at the same Orifice. In a Monkey there was two Inches distance.
  • 16. The Colon was here longer.
  • 17. The Liver not divided into Lobes, as in Apes and Monkeys; but entire, as in Man.
  • 18. The Biliary Vessels, the same as in Man.
  • 19. The Spleen the same.
  • 20. The Pancreas the same.
  • 21. The Number of the Lobes of the Lungs, the same as a Man's.
  • 22. The Pericardium fastened to the Diaphragm, as in Man; but is not so in Apes and Monkeys.
  • 23. The Cone of the Heart, not so pointed, as in Apes.
  • 24. It had not those Pouches in the Chaps, as Apes and Monkeys have.
  • 25. The Brain was abundantly larger than in Apes; and all it's Parts exactly formed like the Humane Brain.
  • 26. The Cranium more globous; and twice as big as an Ape's or Monkey's.
  • ...

Page 93

  • 27. All the Sutures here, like the Humane: And in the Lambdoidal uture were the Ossa triquetra Wormiana. In Apes and Monkeys 'tis other∣wise,
  • 28. It had an Os Cribriforme, and the Crista Galli; which Monkeys have not.
  • 29. The Sella Equina here, the same as in Man; in the Ape-kind 'tis more rising and eminent.
  • 30. The Processus Pterygoides, as in Man: In Apes and Monkeys they are wanting.
  • 31. The Ossa Bregmatis and Temporum here the same as in Man. In Monkeys they are different.
  • 32. The Os Zygomaticum in the Pygmie was small; in the Monkey and Apes 'tis bigger.
  • 33. The Shape of the Teeth more resembled the Humane, especially the Dentes Canini and Molares.
  • 34. The Transverse Apophyses of the Vertebrae of the Neck, and the Sixth and Seventh Vertebra, were liker the Humane, than these Parts in Apes and Monkeys are.
  • 35. The Vertebrae of the Neck had not those Foramina for transmitting the Nerves; which Apes have and Man has not.
  • 36. The Vertebrae of the Back, and their Apophyses Rectae like the Hu∣mane: and in the lower Vertebrae but two Apophyses infernae; not four, as in Apes.
  • 37. There were but five Vertebrae of the Loins here, as in Man: in Apes and Monkeys there are six.
  • 38. The Spines of the Lumbal Vertebrae strait, as in Man.
  • 39. The Os Sacrum was composed of five Vertebrae, as in Man: in Apes and Monkeys there are but three Vertebrae.
  • 40. The Os Coccygis had but four Bones, and these not perforated, as 'tis in Man: In Monkeys there are more Bones, and they are perforated.
  • 41. In the Pygmie there were but seven Costae verae; and the Extreams of the Nothae were Cartilaginous; and the Ribs were articulated to the body of the Vertebrae. In Apes and Monkeys there are eight Costae verae; and the Extreams of the Nothae are ossious; and the Articulation is in the Interstices of the Vertebrae.
  • 42. The Os Sterni in the Pygmie was broad, as in a Man: in the Monkey 'tis narrow.
  • 43. The Bones of the four Fingers much larger than in the Ape-kind.
  • 44. The Thigh-bone in it's Articulation, and all other respects, like the Humane.
  • 45. The Patella round, not long; single, not double; as 'tis said to be in Apes.
  • 46. In the Heel, the Tarsus, and Metatarsus, the Pygmie was like a Man.
  • 47. The middle Toe in the Pygmie was not the longest, as 'tis in the Ape-kind.
  • ...

Page 94

  • 48. These Muscles, viz. The Obliquus Inferior Capitis, the Pyriformis and Biceps Femoris, were like the Humane; whereas the same in Apes and Monkeys are different. And Note, That all the other Muscles that are not otherwise specified in the following Catalogue, were like the Humane also; but whether all the same Muscles in Apes and Monkeys resemble the Humane, Could not be determined, for want of a Subject to compare them with, or Observations made by others.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.