appensum est, tantum{que} valuit ap ud eum qui haec novit appendere, quod confessus est dominum cruci∣fixum, quantum si fuisset pro Domino crucifixus. Tunc enim fides ejus de ligno floruit, quando dis∣cipulorum marcuit, nisi cujus mortis terrore marcuerunt ejus resurrectione reviresceret. Illi enim despe∣raverunt de moriente, ille speravit in commorientem. Refugerunt illi authorem vitae, rogavit ille consortem poenae. Doluerunt illi tanquam homines mortem, credidit ille regnaturum esse post mortem, Deseruerunt illi sponsorem salutis, honoravit ille socium crucis. Inventa est in eo mensura Mar∣tyris, qui tunc in Christum credidit, quando defecerunt, qui futuri erant Martyres.
2. From the Comedy I come to the Tragedy, I meane the story of Spira. Sleidan saith of him, that Incredibili ardore caepit complecti puriorem doctrinam: & cum indies magis magis{que} proficeret, non domi tantum apud amicos quid sentiret de singulis dogmatis, verum etiam passim apud omnes explicabat. Tidings hereof coming to the Popes Legat then at Venice John Casa Arch-Bishop of Beneventum, he convents Spira, who confesseth his errour before him, intreats pardon, and promiseth obedience for time to come. The Le∣gat not contented with this, commands him to goe home, and publiquely to revoke his errour. Sleidan writes no more here of but this, Accipit ille conditionem, & licet etiam tum inciperet ipsum paenitere facti, tamen urgentibus amicis, qui non ipsius modo, sed conjugis etiam & liberorum & facultatum ipsius spem totam in eo positam dicerent, obtemperavit. Osiander writes that pessimo consilio obsecutus, abnegando veritatem caelestem perrexit, eam{que} publice ut haeresin blasphemavit & abjuravit. The distresse of conscience which overtooke him hereup∣on is notorious, the issue whereof was to end his woefull dayes more woefully in despaire. But nothing more strange then his discourses and meditations in the midst of this his desperate condition. As for the particulars following, 1: Touching the greatnesse of his sinne, and that he was taken off from that by the example of Peter, I find no such thing neither in Sleidan, nor Osiander, nor in Goulartius; but rather in this latter, who makes the largest relation thereof taken out of the discourse of one Henry Scringer, a learned Lawyer who was then at Padua, who did see, and many times talke with this poore Spira; I find that which makes to the contrary, namely, that the sinne which he laid to his owne charge was the sinne against the Holy Ghost. And no example I trust neither of Peter, nor any other was sufficient to take him off from despaire in such a case. 2. And as for the discourse here suggested of his absolute reprobation, which he opposed against their comforts ministred unto him, no menti∣on thereof, neither in Sleidan, nor in Osiander; nay Osiander writes that he was wish'd to revoke doctrinam Lutheranam, and this was it which he did (as he sayeth) blaspheme as an heresy, and abjure. Goulartius indeed relates how he conceived himselfe to be reprobated of God, as justly he might in case he judged himselfe to have sinned a∣gainst the Holy Ghost; And as for that which is here set down in Latin, of him that is a Reprobate, namely, that necessario condemnabitur, though his sins be small & few, & that nihil interest multa an pauca, magna an parva sint; quando nec Dei misericordia, nec Christi sanguis quicquam ad eos pertinet. Neither Sleidan, nor Osiander nor Goulartius makes any mention of it. And therefore I wonder not that he neither followeth Sleidan, nor Osiander much lesse that he followes not Goulartius. He cites Caelius secundus and Calvin as his Au∣thours, and some others that wrot thereof to their friends, but names them not; as neither where it is that Caelius secundus makes mention of it, or in what booke of Calvin it is found. I imagined it might be in his Epistles; I have spent some houres in search∣ing therein from the yeare 1545 to the yeare 1663, and can find nothing concerning it. Now Goulartius wrote since Caelius secundus, and Calvin and Sleidan, and his relation is large; and it semes he inquired in to it somewhat better then they that went before him. And thus he relates it out of the discourse of Henry Scringer a Lawyer of Padua, who saw Spira at that time, and divers times spake with him.
In a small towne of the territory of Padua called Civitelle there was a Learned Lawyer, and advocat, a wise and very rich, man and an honourable father of a fa∣mily, called Francis Spira, who having sayd and done divers things against his consci∣ence, to maintaine himselfe and his charge, (observe by the way he delivers the cause only in generall concealing the speciality, it being so strang a testimony and evi∣dence against the Romish Religion) being returned to his house, he could never rest an houre, not a minut, nor have any ease of his continuall anguish: And even from that night he was so terrified and had such horrour of his actions, as he held himselfe for lost. For (as he himselfe did afterward confesse) he did set plainely before his eyes, all the torments, all the paines of the damned, and in his soule did heare the fearfull sentences, being drawne before the judgment seat of Jesus Christ (a fearfull