a just title, because of the rule of the Law, Quod ab initio non valuit, pro∣gressu
temporis valere non debet, and it cannot by time get strength to walk which
enters into the world without feet; now the doubting conscience is but a lame
supporter. But yet because such a conscience which onely hath this speculative
doubt is not malae fidei possessor, therefore he may lawfully still retain the posses∣sion
till the contrary be evicted.
There is this onely to be added, that although prescription or other ways
of just title cannot begin with a doubting conscience, yet if it entred with a
throughly perswaded conscience, it may goe on though it be disquieted by a
supervening doubt. The reason is, because it having lawful Parents of its birth
and first production, cannot be kill'd and destroyed by a suit at Law, it began
well, and therefore had just principles of its progression; and whatsoever hath
the first advantage of just and reasonable, is always to be so presum'd till the
contrary be proved; a doubt therefore may make the man unquiet, and tie
him to inquire, but cannot interrupt the possession or the beginning and grow∣ing
title. Besides the reason, this sentence is confirm'd by the concurring te∣stimonies
of Bartolus, Imola, Sylvester, Felinus, Balbus, and Johannes Hanni∣bal,
under their titles de praescriptionibus & usucapionibus.
There are some accidental hardnesses to the conscience which are inno∣cent,
and because besides the even measures of good and evil by lawful▪ and
unlawful, there are some paths chalked out to us by necessities, by conveniences,
by presumptions, by securities, and other indefinite aims at things which can
sometimes weigh down the best of our imperfect conjectures in some obsure
cases, we may as well walk by the light of the starres, and better too, then to
walk qui••e in the dark; and not onely the Sun is appointed to rule the day, but
there are the Moon and the Stars to govern the night: plain and easy Rules
make a sure conscience, but the doubtful and the dark must be content with a
less light.
For, unlearned men are oftentimes beset with the arguments of a talking
man, which they cannot answer, but create a speculative doubt, and such as
destroys all the certainty of evidence which they had; but if they should not
stick to their own conclusion in despight of all the objections, by a certainty of
adhesion, they might be disturbed in every thing, and confident in nothing, and
might if they met with a Heretick be fool'd out of their Religion, and quit the
most material parts of their beleef. And even the learned have in many ar∣ticles
a presumptive assent to their propositions; and if they be made to doubt
in their understanding by the opposition of an adversary, they are not instantly
to change their practice, but to inquire further. For if after every such doubting
their practice must be insecure or criminal, they might be forc'd to a lightness
greater then that of the Egyptian Priests: and some men can beleeve well,
and dispute ill, but yet their faith must not change at the argument of every
Sophister. In these cases the practice is made secure by a collateral light, and
he is defended from change by reputation, and custome, by fear of scandal, and
the tie of Laws, and by many other indirect instruments of determination,
which although they cannot out-wit the crntrary arguments, yet they ought to
outweigh the doubt, and guide the will, and rule the conscience in such cases.
There is nothing but a weak man may doubt of, but if he be well, he must not
change his foot, till it be made certain to him that he is deceived; let him con∣sider
what he please, and determine at leisure; let him be swift to hear, but
slow to speak, and slower yet in declaring by his action and changed course,