true, that they both suffered not only for the same cause, but at the same time, as well as place. S. Paul was born at Tarsus, the Metropolis of Cilicia; a City infinitely rich and populous, and what contributed more to the fame and honour of it, an Academy, furnished with Schools of Learning, where the Scholars so closely plied their Studies, that as Strabo informs us, they excelled in all Arts of polite Learning and Philoso∣phy those of other places, yea, even of Alexandria, and Athens it self; and that even Rome was beholden to it for many of its best Professors. It was a Roman Municipium, or free Corporation, invested with many Franchises and Priviledges by Julius Caesar, and Augustus, who granted to the Inhabitants of it the honours and immunities of Ci∣tizens of Rome. In which respect S. Paul owned and asserted it as the priviledge of his Birth-right, that he was a Roman, and thereby free from being bound or beaten. True it is, that S. Hierom (followed herein by one, who himself travelled in these parts) makes him born at Gischalis, a well fortified Town in Judaea, which being besieged and taken by the Roman Army, his Parents fled away with him and dwelt at Tarsus. But besides that this contradicts S. Paul, who expresly affirms, that he was born at Tarsus, there needs no more to confute this opinion, than that S. Hierom elsewhere slights it as a fabulous report.
2. HIS Parents were Jews, and that of the Ancient stock, not entering in by the Gate of proselytism, but originally descended from that Nation, which surely he means, when he says, That he was an Hebrew of the Hebrews, either because both his Parents were Jews, or rather, that all his Ancestors had been so. They belonged to the Tribe of Benjamin, whose Founder was the youngest son of the old Patriarch Jacob, who thus prophesied of him. Benjamin shall raven as a Wolf, in the morning he shall devour the prey, and at night he shall divide the spoil. This prophetical character Tertullian, and others after him will have to be accomplished in our Apostle. As a ravening Wolf in the morning devouring the prey, that is, as a persecutor of the Churches, in the first part of his life destroying the flock of God: In the evening dividing the spoil, that is, in his declining and reduced age, as Doctor of the Nations, feeding and distributing to Christ's sheep.
3. WE find him described by two names in Scripture, one Hebrew, and the other Latin; probably referring both to his Jewish and Roman capacity and relation. The one, Saul, a name frequent and common in the Tribe of Benjamin ever since the first King of Israel, who was of that name, was chosen out of that Tribe. In memory whereof they were wont to give their Children this name at their Circumcision. His other was, Paul, assumed by him, as some think, at his Conversion, to denote his humility; as others, in memory of his converting Sergius Paulus the Roman Gover∣nour, in imitation of the Generals and Emperors of Rome, who were wont from the places and Nations that they conquered, to assume the name, as an additional honour and title to themselves, as Scipio Africanus, Caesar Germanicus, Parthicus, Sarmati∣cus, &c. But this seems no way consistent with the great humility of this Apostle. More probable therefore it is, what Origen thinks, That he had a double name gi∣ven him at his Circumcision; Saul, relating to his Jewish original; and Paul, refer∣ring to the Roman Corporation, where he was born. And this the Scripture seems to favour, when it says, Saul, who also is called Paul. Or if it was taken up by him afterwards, it was probably done at his Conversion, according to the custom and man∣ner of the Hebrews, who used many times upon solemn and eminent occasions, especi∣ally upon their entering upon a more strict and religious course of life, to change their names, and assume one which they had not before.
4. IN his Youth he was brought up in the Schools of Tarsus, fully instructed in all the liberal Arts and Sciences, whereby he became admirably acquainted with foreign and external Authors. Together with which he was brought up to a particular Trade and course of life; according to the great Maxim and principle of the Jews, That, He who teaches not his son a Trade, teaches him to be a Thief. They thought it not only fit, but a necessary part of Education, for their wisest and most learned Rabbins to be brought up to a manual Trade, whereby, if occasion was, he might be able to main∣tain himself. Hence (as Drusius observes) nothing more common in their wri∣tings, than to have them denominated from their callings, Rabbi Jose the Tanner, Rabbi Jochanan the Shoomaker, Rabbi Juda the Baker, &c. A custom taken up by the Christians, especially the Monks and Asceticks of the Primitive times, who together with their strict profession and almost incredible exercises of devotion, each took upon him a particular Trade, whereat he daily wrought, and by his own hand-labour main∣tained himself. And this course of life the Jews were very careful should be free from