To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
This later they drew, as an inference from the former, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 the rule of contraries. But Logick being the rule of reason, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 now is corrupt, is it self in some respect corrupt also. Sure we are,
be it what Logick it will, it is but carnall Divinity. Sutable it is to* 1.1 〈◊〉〈◊〉 nature, but so much the more suspicious. The Pharisees taught 〈◊〉〈◊〉, and were applauded. The Papists also little better (for the 〈◊〉〈◊〉 are fled and hid in the Papists, as one saith the ancient 〈◊〉〈◊〉 are in the Monks) they teach, that in two cases only we 〈◊〉〈◊〉 bound to help our enemies, in the case of extremity, and of 〈◊〉〈◊〉. For other things, to love them, to pray for them, or do them good in other cases, it's but a counsell our Saviour gives, and 〈◊〉〈◊〉 commandment. If men can doe it, its well; but if they cannot, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 not required. Thus say they, But what saith Christ the Law∣maker, and so the truest Interpreter thereof?
Consu'e 〈◊〉〈◊〉 Logic. lib. 3 cap 2 p 5. 0.