Three treatises concerning the Scotish discipline 1. A fair warning to take heed of the same, by the Right Reverend Dr. Bramhall, Bishop of Derris : 2. A review of Dr. Bramble, late Bishop of London-Derry, his fair warning, &c. by R.B.G. : 3. A second fair warning, in vindication of the first, against the seditious reviewer, by Ri. Watson, chaplain to the Right Honorable the Lord Hopton : to which is prefixed, a letter written by the Reverend Dean of St. Burien, Dr. Creyghton.

About this Item

Title
Three treatises concerning the Scotish discipline 1. A fair warning to take heed of the same, by the Right Reverend Dr. Bramhall, Bishop of Derris : 2. A review of Dr. Bramble, late Bishop of London-Derry, his fair warning, &c. by R.B.G. : 3. A second fair warning, in vindication of the first, against the seditious reviewer, by Ri. Watson, chaplain to the Right Honorable the Lord Hopton : to which is prefixed, a letter written by the Reverend Dean of St. Burien, Dr. Creyghton.
Publication
Hagh :: Printed by Samuel Brown ...,
1661.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Church of Scotland -- Controversial literature.
Solemn League and Covenant (1643)
Scotland -- Church history.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A62502.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Three treatises concerning the Scotish discipline 1. A fair warning to take heed of the same, by the Right Reverend Dr. Bramhall, Bishop of Derris : 2. A review of Dr. Bramble, late Bishop of London-Derry, his fair warning, &c. by R.B.G. : 3. A second fair warning, in vindication of the first, against the seditious reviewer, by Ri. Watson, chaplain to the Right Honorable the Lord Hopton : to which is prefixed, a letter written by the Reverend Dean of St. Burien, Dr. Creyghton." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A62502.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 15, 2025.

Pages

CHAP. III. (Book 3)

That this Discipline robs the Magistrate of the last appeal of his Subjects.

The second flows from this. The last appeal ought to be the Supream * 1.1 Magistrate, or Magistrates, within his or their Dominions, as to the highest Power under God. And where it is not so ordered, the Com∣mon-wealth can injoy no tranquillity, as we shall see in the second part of this discourse. By the Laws of England, if any man find himself grieved with the sentence or consistoriall proceedings of a Bishop, or of his officers, he may appeal from the highest judicatory of the Church to the King in Chancery, who useth in that case to grant Commissions under the great Seal to Delegates expert in the Laws of the Realm, who have power to give him remedy, and to see Justice done. In Scotland this would be taken in great scorn, as an high indignity upon the Com∣missioners of Christ, to appeal from his Tribunal, to the judgement of a mortal man. In the year 1582, King James by his letter, by his mes∣senger, * 1.2 the Master of Requests, and by an Herald at Arms prohibited the Assembly at Saint Andrews to proceed in the case of one Mongo∣mery, * 1.3 and Mongomery, himself appealed to Cesar, or to King and Councel. What did our new Masters upon this? They sleighted the Kings letter, his Messenger, his Herald, rejected the Appeal, as made to an incompe∣tent Judge, and proceeded most violenlty in the cause. About four years after this another Synod held at Saint Andrews, proceeded in like * 1.4 manner against the Bishop of that See, for Voting in Parliament accord∣ing to his conscience, and for being suspected to have penned a Decla∣ration, published by the King and Parliament at the end of the Sta∣tutes, notwithstanding that he declined their judicature, and appealed to the King and Parliament. When did any Bishops dare to doe such acts? There need no more instances, their book of Discipline it self be∣ing so full in the case, from the Kirk there is no reclamation, or appellation, to any Judge Civil or Ecclsiastical, within the Realm.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.