The discovery of witchcraft proving that the compacts and contracts of witches with devils and all infernal spirits or familiars are but erroneous novelties and imaginary conceptions : also discovering, how far their power extendeth in killing, tormenting, consuming, or curing the bodies of men, women, children, or animals by charms, philtres, periapts, pentacles, curses, and conjurations : wherein likewise the unchristian practices and inhumane dealings of searchers and witch-tryers upon aged, melancholly, and superstitious people, in extorting confessions by terrors and tortures, and in devising false marks and symptoms, are notably detected ... : in sixteen books / by Reginald Scot ... ; whereunto is added an excellent Discourse of the nature and substance of devils and spirits, in two books : the first by the aforesaid author, the second now added in this third edition ... conducing to the compleating of the whole work, with nine chapters at the beginning of the fifteenth [sic] book of The discovery.

About this Item

Title
The discovery of witchcraft proving that the compacts and contracts of witches with devils and all infernal spirits or familiars are but erroneous novelties and imaginary conceptions : also discovering, how far their power extendeth in killing, tormenting, consuming, or curing the bodies of men, women, children, or animals by charms, philtres, periapts, pentacles, curses, and conjurations : wherein likewise the unchristian practices and inhumane dealings of searchers and witch-tryers upon aged, melancholly, and superstitious people, in extorting confessions by terrors and tortures, and in devising false marks and symptoms, are notably detected ... : in sixteen books / by Reginald Scot ... ; whereunto is added an excellent Discourse of the nature and substance of devils and spirits, in two books : the first by the aforesaid author, the second now added in this third edition ... conducing to the compleating of the whole work, with nine chapters at the beginning of the fifteenth [sic] book of The discovery.
Author
Scot, Reginald, 1538?-1599.
Publication
London :: Printed for Andrew Clark ...,
1665.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Witchcraft.
Magic.
Demonology.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A62397.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The discovery of witchcraft proving that the compacts and contracts of witches with devils and all infernal spirits or familiars are but erroneous novelties and imaginary conceptions : also discovering, how far their power extendeth in killing, tormenting, consuming, or curing the bodies of men, women, children, or animals by charms, philtres, periapts, pentacles, curses, and conjurations : wherein likewise the unchristian practices and inhumane dealings of searchers and witch-tryers upon aged, melancholly, and superstitious people, in extorting confessions by terrors and tortures, and in devising false marks and symptoms, are notably detected ... : in sixteen books / by Reginald Scot ... ; whereunto is added an excellent Discourse of the nature and substance of devils and spirits, in two books : the first by the aforesaid author, the second now added in this third edition ... conducing to the compleating of the whole work, with nine chapters at the beginning of the fifteenth [sic] book of The discovery." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A62397.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 13, 2024.

Pages

CHAP. IX.

Of the contention between the Greek and Latine Church touching the fall of Angels, the variance among Papists themselves herein; a conflict between Michael and Lucifer.

THere was also another contention between the Greek Church and the Latine; to wit, of what orders of Angels they were that did fall with Lucifer. Our Schoolmen say; They were of all the nine orders of An∣gels in Lucifer's conspiracy: But because the superior Order was of the more noble constitution and excellent estate, and the inferior of a less worthy nature, the more part of the inferior orders fell as guilty and offenders with Lucifer. Some say, The Devil himself was of the inferior order of Angels;* 1.1 and some, that he was of the highest order; because it is written, In Cherubim extentus & protegens posuite Monte sancto Dei, Extended upon a Cherubim and protecting, I have put thee in the holy Mountain of God. And these say further; That he was called the Dragon, because of his excellent knowledge. Finally these great Doctors conclude, That the Devil himself was of the Order of Seraphim, which is the highest, because it is written, Quo∣modo enim mane oriebaris Lucifer? For when didst thou rise in the morning O Lucifer? They of this sect affirm, That Cacodaemones were they that repelled against Jove; I mean they of Plato his sect, himself also holding the same opi∣nion. Our Schoolmen differ much in the cause of Lucifers fall. For some say it was for speaking these words, Ponam sedem meam in aquilone, & similis ero altissimo, I will put my seat in the North, and I will be like the most High. Others say; Because he utterly refused felicity, and thought scorn thereof: Others say, Because he thought all his strength proceeded from himself, and not from God; Others say that it was, Because he attempted to do that by himself, and his own

Page 9

ability, which he should have obtained by the gift of another; Others say, That his condemnation grew hereupon, for that he challenged the place of the Messias; Others say, Because he detracted the time to adore the Majesty of God, as other Angels did; Others say, Because he utterly refused it. Scotus and his Disciples say that it was, Because he rebelliously claimed equal Omnipotency with God; with whom lightly the Thomists never agree. Others say, It was for all these causes together,* 1.2 and many more; so as hereupon (saith Laurentius Ananias) grew a wonderful conflict between Michael and his good Angels on the one side, and Lucifer and his Fiends on the other: so as, after a long and doubtful skirmish, Michael overthrew Lucifer, and turned him and his fellows out of the doores.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.