Scot's Discovery of vvitchcraft proving the common opinions of witches contracting with divels, spirits, or familiars ... to be but imaginary, erronious conceptions and novelties : wherein also, the lewde unchristian all written and published in anno 1584, by Reginald Scot, Esquire.

About this Item

Title
Scot's Discovery of vvitchcraft proving the common opinions of witches contracting with divels, spirits, or familiars ... to be but imaginary, erronious conceptions and novelties : wherein also, the lewde unchristian all written and published in anno 1584, by Reginald Scot, Esquire.
Author
Scot, Reginald, 1538?-1599.
Publication
[London] :: Printed by R.C. and are to be sold by Giles Calvert ...,
1651.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800.
Demonology -- Early works to 1800.
Occultism -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A62395.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Scot's Discovery of vvitchcraft proving the common opinions of witches contracting with divels, spirits, or familiars ... to be but imaginary, erronious conceptions and novelties : wherein also, the lewde unchristian all written and published in anno 1584, by Reginald Scot, Esquire." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A62395.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 14, 2024.

Pages

CHAP. IIII.

Of one that was so bewitched that he could read no Scriptures but ca∣nonicall, of a divell that could speak no Latine a proof that witch∣craft is flat cousenage.

HEre I may aptly insert another miracle of importance,* 1.1 that happened within the compasse of a childes remembrance, which may induce any reasonable body to conceive, that these supernaturall actions are but fa∣bles and cousenages. There was one, whom for some respects I name not, that was taken blind, deaf, and dumb; so as no Physitian could help him: That man (forsooth) though he was (as is said) both blind, dumb and deaf, yet could he read any canonicall Scriptures; but as for apo∣crypha, hee could read none:* 1.2 wherein a Gods name consisted the miracle. But a leaf of apocrypha being extraordinarily inserted among the canonicall scriptures, he read the same as authentick; wherein his knavery was bewrayed. Another had a divell, that answered men so all questions, Mary her divell could understand no Latine, and so was shee (and by such meanes all the rest may be) bewrayed. In∣deed our witching writers say, that certaine divels speake onely the language of that countrey where they are resiant, as French, or En∣glish, &c.

Furthermore in my conceipt, nothing proveth more apparently that witchcraft is cousenage, and that witches instruments are but ridiculous bables, and altogether void of effect; than when learned and godly Di∣vines in their serious writings, produce experiments as wrought by witches, and by divels at witches commandements: which they expound by mira∣cles, although indeed meer trifles. Whereof they conceive amisse, being overtaken with credulity.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.