Scot's Discovery of vvitchcraft proving the common opinions of witches contracting with divels, spirits, or familiars ... to be but imaginary, erronious conceptions and novelties : wherein also, the lewde unchristian all written and published in anno 1584, by Reginald Scot, Esquire.

About this Item

Title
Scot's Discovery of vvitchcraft proving the common opinions of witches contracting with divels, spirits, or familiars ... to be but imaginary, erronious conceptions and novelties : wherein also, the lewde unchristian all written and published in anno 1584, by Reginald Scot, Esquire.
Author
Scot, Reginald, 1538?-1599.
Publication
[London] :: Printed by R.C. and are to be sold by Giles Calvert ...,
1651.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800.
Demonology -- Early works to 1800.
Occultism -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A62395.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Scot's Discovery of vvitchcraft proving the common opinions of witches contracting with divels, spirits, or familiars ... to be but imaginary, erronious conceptions and novelties : wherein also, the lewde unchristian all written and published in anno 1584, by Reginald Scot, Esquire." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A62395.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 3, 2024.

Pages

Page 102

CHAP. VI.

Apollo, who was call Pytho, compared to the Roe of grace: Gre∣gories letter to the devil confuted.

WHat need many words to confute this fable? For if Gregory 〈◊〉〈◊〉 been an honest man, he would never have willingly 〈◊〉〈◊〉 that the people should have been further cosened with such alying spirit if he had been halfe so holy as Eusebius maketh him, he would not are consented or yeelded to so lewd a request of the priest, nor have write such an impious letter, no not though good might have come there••••. And therefore as well by the impossibility and folly conteined therein, of the impiety (whereof I dare excuse Gregory) you may perceive it to 〈◊〉〈◊〉 a ly. Me thinks they which still maintain that the devil made answer the idol of Apollo, &c. may have sufficient perswasion to revoke their ••••∣roneous opinions: in that it appeareth in record, that such men were skilful in Augurie, did take upon them to give oracles at Delph•••• the place of Apollo:* 1.1 of which number Tisanius the sonne of 〈◊〉〈◊〉 was one. But vain is the answer of idols. Our Rood of grace, with 〈◊〉〈◊〉 helpe of little S. Rumbal, was not inferior to the idol of Apollo: for 〈◊〉〈◊〉 could not work eternall miracles, but manifest the internall thought the heart, I beleeve with more lively shew, both of humanity and 〈◊〉〈◊〉 of divinity,* 1.2 than the other. As if you read M. Lamberts book of 〈◊〉〈◊〉 perambulation of Kent, it shall partly appear. But if you talke 〈◊〉〈◊〉 them that have been beholders thereof, you will be satisfied herein▪ 〈◊〉〈◊〉 yet in the blind time of popery, no man might under pain of dama•••• on, nor without danger of death, suspect the fraud. Nay, what 〈◊〉〈◊〉 will yet confesse they were idols, though the wiers that made their ••••gogle, the pins that fastened them to the postes to make them seem 〈◊〉〈◊〉, were seen and burnt together with the images themselves the knavery of the priests bewraied, and every circumstance thereof detected and manifested?

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.